CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 271Social and Intergroup PsychologyDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social Perception and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Jussim, Lee·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195366600.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This book contests the received wisdom in the field of social psychology that suggests that social perception and judgment are generally flawed, biased, and powerfully self-fulfilling. The book reviews a wealth of real-world, survey, and experimental data collected over the last century to show that, in fact, social psychological research consistently demonstrates that biases and self-fulfilling prophecies are generally weak, fragile, and fleeting. Furthermore, research in the social sciences has shown stereotypes to be accurate. The book overturns the received wisdom concerning social perception in several ways. It critically reviews studies that are highly cited darlings of the bias conclusion and shows how these studies demonstrate far more accuracy than bias, or are not replicable in subsequent research. Studies of equal or higher quality, which have been replicated consistently, are shown to demonstrate high accuracy, low bias, or both. The book is peppered with discussions suggesting that theoretical and political blinders have led to an odd state of affairs in which the flawed or misinterpreted bias studies receive a great deal of attention, while stronger and more replicable accuracy studies receive relatively little attention. In addition, the book presents both personal and real-world examples (such as stock market prices, sporting events, and political elections) that routinely undermine heavy-handed emphases on error and bias but are generally indicative of high l…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195366600.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–270 of 270

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jussim, L.
Corresponding author
Jussim, Lee
ORCID
Jussim, Lee
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2012-04-06
DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195366600.001.0001
OpenAlex
W2989983672
Cited by
271
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.09
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
social perception, social judgment, cognitive biases, self-fulfilling prophecy, stereotypes, replication, rationality, stock prices, political elections, sports prediction, social psychology theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review