Cited by 596Disability Rights and RepresentationFeminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability

Barnes, Elizabeth·2016

Abstract

There is a massive disconnect between the way disability is understood in the disability rights and disability pride movements and the way disability is understood within analytic philosophy. The former see being disabled as primarily a social phenomenon—a way of being a minority, a way of facing social oppression, but not a way of being inherently or intrinsically worse off. But while this view of disability has been widely incorporated into academic disability studies, it remains at the margins of analytic philosophy. The idea that disability is not inherently bad or suboptimal is one that many philosophers treat with open skepticism, and sometimes even with scorn. The goal of this book is to articulate and defend a version of the view of disability that is common in the disability rights movement. This book argues that to be physically disabled is not to have a defective body, but simply to have a minority body.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732587.001.0001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disability is assumed to be incompatible with living good or happy lives.

    “This follows a typical set of stereotypes widely held about disabled persons, whereby disability is assumed to be incompatible with living good or happy lives (Barnes, 2016).”

    From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Barnes, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, E.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Barnes, Elizabeth
Published
2016-03-01
OpenAlex
W4255727569
Cited by
596
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
35.73
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
disability, disability rights movement, disability pride, social model of disability, disability studies, physical disability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review