The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory
Abstract
Abstract What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? Can legal decisions be justified by purely rational argument or are they ultimately determined by more subjective influences? These questions are central to the study of jurisprudence, and are critically examined in this book.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Two challenges could hamper the adoption of XAI techniques for tax AI systems.26”
From Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Orthodoxy and the Courts in Late Antiquity
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.001.0001 · Cited by 263
The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.001.0001 · Cited by 196
A Modest Notion of Coherence in Legal Reasoning. A Model for the European Court of Justice
Soriano, L. M. (2003) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/1467-9337.00238 · Cited by 129
Rebellion and Violence in Islamic Law
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163 · Cited by 98
Cultural evidence in courts of law
Good, A. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00492.x · Cited by 63
The Nature of International Law
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060 · Cited by 51
Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence*
Amaya, A. (2011) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00486.x · Cited by 43
Blockchain Securities, Insolvency Law and the Sandbox Approach
Mangano, R. (2018) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-018-0123-5 · Cited by 43
Hage, J. C. (2004) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00257.x · Cited by 37
Algunas consideraciones sobre los sistemas jurídicos
Bulygin, E. (1991) · DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho · doi:10.14198/doxa1991.9.13 · Cited by 37
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
Pastore, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0 · Cited by 36
Assessing judicial activism of the CJEU the case of the court’s defence procurement rulings
Terpan, F., & Saurugger, S. (2018) · Journal of European Integration · doi:10.1080/07036337.2018.1537268 · Cited by 32
Legal Positivism, Law's Normativity, and the Normative Force of Legal Justification
Spaak, T. (2003) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1046/j.0952-1917.2003.00246.x · Cited by 32
Sources of Law Are not Legal Norms
Shecaira, F. P. (2014) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12053 · Cited by 31
Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard
Kuźniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., Górski, L., Winogradska, B., & Zeldenrust, R. (2022) · World Tax Journal · doi:10.59403/2yhh9pa · Cited by 31
Vaquero, Á. N. (2013) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.2449 · Cited by 30
The Conflation of Competence and Capacity in English Medical Law: A Philosophical Critique
Bielby, P. (2005) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-005-0537-z · Cited by 29
Legal Argumentation Theory and the Concept of Law
Bertea, S. (2003) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_17 · Cited by 28
Taking Rights less Seriously. A Structural Analysis of Judicial Discretion
Klatt, M. (2007) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00373.x · Cited by 24
Bix, B. H. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470690116.ch2 · Cited by 21
Bellolio, F. C. (2012) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1_1 · Cited by 20
Why is Legal Reasoning Defeasible?
Carlos, J. B. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2702-0_17 · Cited by 19
Digisprudence: Code as Law Rebooted
Diver, L. (2021) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781474485340 · Cited by 32
Sampaio, J. S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89647-2_4 · Cited by 18
Judicial Decision-Making, Ideology and the Political: Towards an Agonistic Theory of Adjudication
Mańko, R. (2021) · Law and Critique · doi:10.1007/s10978-021-09288-w · Cited by 18
Stoljar, N. (2003) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9760.2003.00186.x · Cited by 17
A Pragmatically Oriented Theory of Legal Interpretation
Villa, V. (2010) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.146 · Cited by 15
Constitutionalism and the Paradox of Principles and Rules
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.001.0001 · Cited by 12
EL CONCEPTO DE DISCRECIONALIDAD Y SU CONTROL
Sampol, J. M. (2003) · Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez · doi:10.30827/acfs.v37i0.1096 · Cited by 12
Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?
Bertea, S. (2005) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-005-0510-2 · Cited by 11
Jueces ordinarios y Justicia Constitucional
Wartenberg, R. L. (2007) · Revista Chilena de Derecho · doi:10.4067/s0718-34372007000300009 · Cited by 11
To What Extent Is the Opposition Between Civil Law and Common Law Relevant for Law and Economics?
Lanneau, R. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7110-9_2 · Cited by 10
Relativism in Legal Thinking: Stanley Fish and the Concept of an Interpretative Community
Spaak, T. (2008) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00384.x · Cited by 9
What Is Legal Reasoning About: A Jurisprudential Account
Canale, D., & Tuzet, G. (2020) · Palgrave Studies in Institutions, Economics and Law · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40168-9_2 · Cited by 9
Transformation and Integration of Legal Cultures and Discourses—Poland
Zirk-Sadowski, M. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3842-9_14 · Cited by 8
Interpretación literal: juristas y lingüistas frente a frente
Mazzarese, T. L. P. (2000) · DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho · doi:10.14198/doxa2000.23.22 · Cited by 8
Constitutionalizing Leviathan: A Critique of Buchanan’s Conception of Lawmaking
Bertolini, D. (2019) · Homo Oeconomicus · doi:10.1007/s41412-019-00086-5 · Cited by 7
Where Objective Facts and Norms Meet (and What this Means for Law)
Bertea, S. (2022) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-022-09906-5 · Cited by 7
Del Derecho y el razonamiento jurídico
Lemaitre, F. A. (1999) · DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho · doi:10.14198/doxa1999.22.03 · Cited by 7
Jakab, A., Dyèvre, A., & Itzcovich, G. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316084281.003 · Cited by 8
Legislative Policy and Effectiveness: A (Small) Contribution from Legal Theory
Zamboni, M. (2018) · European Journal of Risk Regulation · doi:10.1017/err.2018.32 · Cited by 6
Linhares, J. M. A. (2019) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-019-09670-z · Cited by 6
Dinamika Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Tjandra, W. R. (2012) · Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada · doi:10.22146/jmh.16158 · Cited by 6
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited
Atria, F. (1999) · Law and Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1006355927284 · Cited by 6
Good, A. (2015) · The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law · doi:10.1080/07329113.2015.1113645 · Cited by 8
de Bustamante, T. D. R. (2014) · Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade · doi:10.17808/des.37.202 · Cited by 6
Policy arguments for proprietary restitution
Swadling, W. (2008) · Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1748-121x.2008.00103.x · Cited by 6
La interpretación conforme con la Constitución: una aproximación conceptual
Cruz, J. Á. F. (2016) · Ius et Praxis · doi:10.4067/s0718-00122016000200006 · Cited by 6
A default framework for fundamental rights impact assessment
García-Godínez, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00761-1 · Cited by 7
Kajian Filosofis Prinsip Audi Et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata
Handayani, D. (2020) · Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum · doi:10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.385-402 · Cited by 5
English common law versus German Systemdenken? Internal versus external approaches
Riesenhuber, K. (2011) · Utrecht Law Review · doi:10.18352/ulr.150 · Cited by 5
In defence of a constructivist conception of legal interpretation
Vidal, I. (2020) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.5897 · Cited by 5
Ros, L. D. (2014) · Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade · doi:10.17808/des.31.262 · Cited by 5
EL PAPEL DE LA COACCIÓN EN LA TEORÍA DE LAS REGLAS DE HART
Ochoa, A. M. (2011) · Ius et Praxis · doi:10.4067/s0718-00122011000200011 · Cited by 4
Lamond, G. (2007) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00092.x · Cited by 4
Referendum Authorization Procedures in Europe
Forgács, A. (2023) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035311217 · Cited by 3
Rhetoric Meets Rational Argumentation Theory
Paso, M. (2014) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12043 · Cited by 4
Feteris, E. T. (1991) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/00028533.1991.11951522 · Cited by 4
Coherencia en el derecho: conservadurismo y fidelidad a la base de reglas
Maranhão, J. S. D. A., & Rapetti, P. A. (2021) · Discusiones · doi:10.52292/j.dsc.2011.2527 · Cited by 4
Criminal law and legal dogmatics
Manrique, M. L., Navarro, P. E., & Peralta, J. M. (2017) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.3806 · Cited by 4
Social and Justified Legal Normativity: Unlocking the Mystery of the Relationship
Rodríguez-Blanco, V. (2012) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00521.x · Cited by 3
Silveira, L. (2014) · Recht en Methode in onderzoek en onderwijs · doi:10.5553/rem/.000007 · Cited by 3
Costa, R. D. O. (2017) · Athens Journal of Law · doi:10.30958/ajl.3-2-2 · Cited by 3
Border troubles. Some uncertainties of legal transfer
Messner, C. (2020) · International Journal of Legal Discourse · doi:10.1515/ijld-2020-2033 · Cited by 3
Taking analogy seriously: Statutory analogy in creation and interpretation of law
Dajović, G. (2020) · Pravni zapisi · doi:10.5937/pravzap0-29531 · Cited by 3
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF NORMATIVE CONTESTATION OF AUTOMATED DATA-DRIVEN DECISIONS
Bayamlıoğlu, E. (2018) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvhrd092.8 · Cited by 3
BEARING OF SCIENTIFIC DATA ON LEGAL REASONING
Tuffuor, K. A. (2022) · UCC Law Journal · doi:10.47963/ucclj.v2i2.1117 · Cited by 3
Strzałkowski, A. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108176 · Cited by 3
Sobre el razonamiento principal de una sentencia judicial
Marín, R. L. H. (2019) · DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho · doi:10.14198/doxa2019.42.05 · Cited by 3
En defensa de una concepción constructivista de la interpretación jurídica
Vidal, I. (2019) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.5423 · Cited by 3
Schiavello, A. (2011) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00480.x · Cited by 3
Conservative Coherentist Closure of Legal Systems
Maranhão, J. S. D. A. (2015) · Legisprudence library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_4 · Cited by 3
Tans, O. J. (2017) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-017-9516-y · Cited by 3
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF NORMATIVE CONTESTATION OF AUTOMATED DATA-DRIVEN DECISIONS
Bayamlıoğlu, E. (2018) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9789048550180-006 · Cited by 3
Multi-modal argumentation and rhetoric in judicial proceedings
Novak, M. (2020) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/10511431.2019.1708686 · Cited by 3
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, CIVILITY AND ARTIFICE
Simmonds, N. E. (2019) · The Cambridge Law Journal · doi:10.1017/s000819731800096x · Cited by 3
Ewolucja teorii rozumowania prawniczego Neila MacCormicka
Sopiński, M. (2019) · Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej · doi:10.36280/afpifs.2019.1.63 · Cited by 3
Legal Judgment as a Philosophical Archetype
Tuzet, G. (2011) · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy · doi:10.4000/ejpap.851 · Cited by 2
PRECEDENTES E JURISPRUDÊNCIA NO SISTEMA JURÍDICO BRASILEIRO: UMA DISTINÇÃO NECESSÁRIA
Scheleder, A. F. P. (2017) · Revista de Processo Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça · doi:10.26668/indexlawjournals/2017.v3i2.2427 · Cited by 2
New Instruments for Human Rights Protection in Globalization
Puente, A. M. O. (2020) · The Age of Human Rights Journal · doi:10.17561/tahrj.v14.5484 · Cited by 2
A deflationary approach to legal ontology
García-Godínez, M. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04487-1 · Cited by 2
Legal philosophy and the study of legal reasoning
Spaak, T. (2021) · Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu · doi:10.51204/anali_pfbu_21405a · Cited by 2
Legal Reasoning and Systematization of Law
Navarro, P. E. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2702-0_14 · Cited by 2
The Third Theory of Legal Objectivity
Schiavello, A. (2013) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6110-0_7 · Cited by 2
WINTGENS, L. J. (2011) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.2006 · Cited by 2
La objetividad del derecho como función de la subjetividad/objetividad del juez
Sánchez, C. O. (2009) · Revista de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso · doi:10.4067/s0718-68512009000200016 · Cited by 2
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.003.009 · Cited by 2
Neto, J. A. (2016) · Revista Direito GV · doi:10.1590/2317-6172201635 · Cited by 2
Neoconstitucionalismo y argumentación jurídica
Figueroa, A. J. G. (2017) · Derecho PUCP · doi:10.18800/derechopucp.201702.001 · Cited by 2
argumento interpretativo intercultural en la Corte Constitucional
Paucay, V. S. (2018) · Killkana Social · doi:10.26871/killkana_social.v2i4.353 · Cited by 2
Why Legal Conventionalism Fails
Dyrda, A. M. (2015) · Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej · doi:10.36280/afpifs.2015.1.14 · Cited by 2
Justice-Aptness of International Law
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.007 · Cited by 2
Kurnia, T. S. (2022) · Jurnal Konstitusi · doi:10.31078/jk1915 · Cited by 2
El rol de la justicia en el procedimiento y conclusión de los marcs y el proceso judicial
Caso, G. R. (2017) · THEMIS Revista de Derecho · doi:10.18800/themis.201701.013 · Cited by 2
The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union
Conway, G. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6_14 · Cited by 2
Hund, J. (1994) · History and Philosophy of Logic · doi:10.1080/01445349408837232 · Cited by 2
Ensuring Uniform Case Law in Slovenia: Jurisprudence Constante, Stare Decisis, and a Third Approach
Novak, M. (2018) · Studia Iuridica Lublinensia · doi:10.17951/sil.2018.27.1.131 · Cited by 1
Dialectical Approach to Legal Arguing and Legal Argumentation
Дудаш, Т. (2021) · Philosophy of Law and General Theory of Law · doi:10.21564/2707-7039.2.242855 · Cited by 1
Gaudêncio, A. M. S. (2022) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87718-7_8 · Cited by 1
Lima, P. (2015) · Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas · doi:10.5020/2317-2150.2015.v20n2p505 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- MacCormick, N.
- Corresponding author
- MacCormick, Neil
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1994-08-11
- OpenAlex
- W4230311549
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Language and Interpretation
- Keywords
- legal reasoning, legal theory, justification of legal decisions, rational arguments, legal personality, legal argumentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
