The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory
Abstract
Abstract What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? Can legal decisions be justified by purely rational argument or are they ultimately determined by more subjective influences? These questions are central to the study of jurisprudence, and are critically examined in this book.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Two challenges could hamper the adoption of XAI techniques for tax AI systems.26”
From Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 292
Are modal verbs a lexical characteristic of legal terminology?
Hamiti, V., & Sopjani, V. (2023) · XLinguae · doi:10.18355/xl.2023.16.01.06 · Cited by 1
A Default Model of Normative Risk for the EU AI Act
García-Godínez, M. (2025) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-025-00207-5 · Cited by 1
Santos, K. M. M. (2013) · Revista de Direito Internacional · doi:10.5102/rdi.v9i4.2117 · Cited by 1
İdari yargı kararlarının şekli üzerine eleştirel bir inceleme
Serkan, K. (2014) · Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.1501/hukfak_0000001758 · Cited by 1
Loyalty and Non-exclusive Competences
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0008 · Cited by 1
Supremacy, Pre-emption, and the Union Interest
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.003.010 · Cited by 1
Ecclesiastics as Forensic Practitioners
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.003.007 · Cited by 1
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0007 · Cited by 1
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0010 · Cited by 1
The Tapestry of Reason: Generality, Specificity and Legal Philosophy
LUCY, W. N. R. (2017) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12182 · Cited by 1
Essential Content of Fundamental Rights from the Discursive and Principialist Model of Robert Alexy
Espinoza, J. L. L., & Sánchez, R. L. (2019) · Oñati Socio-legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1042 · Cited by 1
Legal principles in Croatian Legal Science: Fundamental Character and Indeterminacy
Keršić, M. (2020) · Pravni vjesnik · doi:10.25234/pv/8273 · Cited by 1
The Architecture of the Legal Mind
Brożek, B. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108623056.007 · Cited by 1
Jurisprudential Methodology: Is Pure Interpretation Possible?
Walton, K. (2013) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6067-7_13 · Cited by 1
Novak, M. (2022) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v42i3.7503 · Cited by 1
Algunos límites semánticos en la redacción de contratos más inteligentes
Villa, Y. V. (2023) · Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología · doi:10.5354/0719-2584.2022.67825 · Cited by 1
Díez, C. A. D. (2023) · Revista de Derecho Público Teoría y método · doi:10.37417/rpd/vol_7_2023_1312 · Cited by 1
Integrating the Olympic Truce into international law: legal implications of the Russian case
Marco, A. D. (2025) · The International Sports Law Journal · doi:10.1007/s40318-025-00293-0 · Cited by 1
Critical legal studies and coherence in the decision-making process: the Brazilian case
Filho, R. F. (2015) · Universitas Jus · doi:10.5102/unijus.v26i1.3446 · Cited by 1
PRECEDENTES E JURISPURDÊNCIA: UMA DISTINÇÃO NECESSÁRIA NO SISTEMA JURÍDICO BRASILEIRO
Scheleder, A. F. P. (2015) · Revista Eletrônica Direito e Política · doi:10.14210/rdp.v10n3.p2079-2111 · Cited by 1
A Retórica da Metáfora dos Modelos na Teoria do Direito
Parini, P. (2013) · Seqüência estudos jurídicos e políticos · doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2013v34n67p81 · Cited by 1
Effectiveness, Judicial Protection, and Loyalty
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Coherence and Systematization in Law
Amaya, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9452-0_22 · Cited by 1
Enunciados no comprometidos y punto de vista jurídico: una perspectiva renovada
Vecchi, D. D. (2017) · Crítica (México D F En línea) · doi:10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.118 · Cited by 1
Neil McCormick’s Theory of Legal Reasoning and Its Evolution
Sopiński, M. (2020) · Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej · doi:10.36280/afpifs.2019.1.63eng · Cited by 1
Normativity of international law
Dajović, G. (2021) · Pravni zapisi · doi:10.5937/pravzap0-33820 · Cited by 1
Uscamayta, G. E., Trelles, J. E. S., & Jallo, N. J. A. (2022) · Cogency · doi:10.32995/cogency.v13i2.377 · Cited by 1
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0015 · Cited by 1
Practical Wisdom in Legal Decision-Making
(2014) · Hart Publishing eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781472566294.ch-002 · Cited by 1
Karl Olivecrona on LegislationPreprint
Spaak, T. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2149549 · Cited by 1
The doctrinal foundations of the laws of rebellion
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.004 · Cited by 1
Duxbury, N. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139135009.004 · Cited by 1
Michelon, C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_728-1 · Cited by 1
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.003.002 · Cited by 1
Green, S. P. (2013) · The International Encyclopedia of Ethics · doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee518 · Cited by 1
(2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.002.0005 · Cited by 1
Coherence and Systematization in LawPreprint
Amaya, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4238938 · Cited by 1
Theories of Legal Reasoning and Types of Judicial Conscience
Shytov, A. N. (2001) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9745-6_4
Rebellion, insurgency, and brigandage: the developed positions and the emergence of trends
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.008
Natural Justice and Conscience of the Judges in Case Ridge V. Baldwin
Shytov, A. N. (2001) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9745-6_9
Reflexões sobre responsabilidade política e sociocultural dos magistrados
de Oliveira, J. A. (2010) · Revista do Direito · doi:10.17058/rdunisc.v0i0.1799
The historical context and the creative response
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.005
Pragmatično usmerjeni nauk o pravnem razlaganju
Villa, V. (2010) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.132
INSUFICIENCIAS DEL ANÁLISIS ECONÓMICO COMO BASE PARA UNA TEORÍA DE LA ADJUDICACIÓN
Cinca, C. D. M. (2014) · Revista Chilena de Derecho · doi:10.4067/s0718-34372014000300007
Charles Sanders Peirce, A Mastermind of (Legal) Arguments
Verenich, V. (2011) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-011-9216-y
Watchfulness as an Implication of Agapic Casuistry
Shytov, A. N. (2001) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9745-6_8
Aquinas’s Theory of Conscience and Legal Reasoning
Shytov, A. N. (2001) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9745-6_3
Fact Reasoning with Reliable D-S Evidence Theory
Ping, W., & Zhu, X. (2009) · doi:10.1109/iita.2009.230
The developed non-Sunnī positions
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.009
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.001
Vaquero, Á. N. (2013) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.2457
de Lima, P. P. M. (2015) · Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas · doi:10.5020/23172150.2012.430-459
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.002
Santos, K. M. M. (2013) · Revista de Direito Internacional · doi:10.5102/rdi/bjil.v9i4.2117
Modern scholarship and reorienting the approach to rebellion
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.003
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.003.005
Legal Experts and the Late Roman Courts
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.003.004
Litigation and Late Roman Judges
Humfress, C. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208419.003.003
Negotiating rebellion in Islamic law
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.010
The spread of the Islamic law of rebellion from the fourth/tenth to the fifth/eleventh centuries
Fadl, K. M. A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511560163.007
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0012
A Primer on the Structure of Union Law
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0004
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0001
Juridical Individualism, State Power And Legal Reasoning
Norrie, A. (1991) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0699-0_8
Amplification and the Limits of Loyalty
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0014
Klamert, M. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.003.0002
Mirić, M. K. (2016) · Baltic Journal of Law & Politics · doi:10.1515/bjlp-2016-0009
La ley penal y la autoridad de la dogmática
Manrique, M. L., Navarro, P. E., & Peralta, J. M. (2017) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.3760
Equitable allowances or restitutionary measures for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt
Whayman, D. (2017) · Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly · doi:10.53386/nilq.v68i2.34
Amaya, A. (2017) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12188
Lamond, G. (2017) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12181
Perin, F. D. (2018) · Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea · doi:10.21875/tjc.v2i2.8502
EXPRESIVISMO METAJURÍDICO, ENUNCIADOS INTERNOS Y ACEPTACIÓN PLURAL: UNA EXPLORACIÓN CRÍTICA
Rapetti, P. A. (2017) · Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho · doi:10.5347/47.2017.46
Bańkowski, Z. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6_2
La argumentación jurídica en las sentencias judiciales
Negri, N. J. (2018) · doi:10.35537/10915/71530
Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. A. (2005) · A practical logic of cognitive systems · doi:10.1016/s1874-5075(05)80026-9
Espinoza, J. L. L., & Sánchez, R. L. (2019) · Novos Estudos Jurídicos · doi:10.14210/nej.v24n2.p284-320
Taking Legal Positivism Beyond the State: Finding Secondary Rules?
Collins, R. (2019) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_3 · Cited by 1
Truth in judicial interpretation from positivist and non-positivist perspectives
Antonov, M. V. (2019) · Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filosofiya Sotsiologiya Politologiya · doi:10.17223/1998863x/48/17
International Law as an Institutionalized and (Coercively) Guaranteed Order
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.006
In Search of the Nature of (International) Law – Methodological Postulates
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.003
International Law as a Normative Order
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.005
Fragmentation – A Special Feature of International Law?
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.008
Schiavello, A. (2021) · Discusiones · doi:10.52292/j.dsc.2017.2585
Rodrigues, R. D. E. S. (2020) · Revista de Teorias da Justiça da Decisão e da Argumentação Jurídica · doi:10.26668/indexlawjournals/2525-9644/2020.v6i1.6566
International Law as a Subject Matter of Legal Philosophy – A Brief Historical Overview
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.002
Tovar, A. N. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos · doi:10.9732/2020.v121.840
La certeza de la sentencia judicial
de Derecho, P. U. C. A. F., Lalanne, J. E., & Argentina (2020) · Prudentia Iuris · doi:10.46553/prudentia.90.2020.pp.79-115
In Lieu of a Conclusion – A Note on (Un)Certainty
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.009
Typical Features of (International) Law
Jovanović, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108608060.004
Os limites do positivismo exclusivista de Joseph Raz
Sgarbi, J. F. B. (2018) · doi:10.11606/d.2.2018.tde-02102020-012557
Metadata
- Authors
- MacCormick, N.
- Corresponding author
- MacCormick, Neil
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1994-08-11
- OpenAlex
- W4230311549
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Language and Interpretation
- Keywords
- legal reasoning, legal theory, justification of legal decisions, rational arguments, legal personality, legal argumentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review