Cited by 916Study and Philosophy of ReligionTheology and Philosophy of EvilEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Existence of God

Open access
Swinburne, Richard·2004·Philosophical Books

Abstract

This book assesses the worth of arguments for and against the existence of God. Evidence confirms (makes more probable) an explanatory hypothesis in so far as (1) given the hypothesis the evidence is to be expected, that is the hypothesis makes the evidence probable, (2) the evidence is not otherwise to be expected, (3) the hypothesis is simple, and (4) it fits with background knowledge (i.e., knowledge about how things behave in neighbouring fields of enquiry). When we are assessing hypotheses (such as theism, the hypothesis that there is a God) purporting to explain everything, there will be no background knowledge. Theism is a very simple hypothesis. If there is a God, there is some reason to expect that he will create a universe, with laws of nature, leading to the evolution of humans (bodies connected to souls), who often have experiences which seem to them experiences of God. It is most improbable that all this evidence would exist if there was no God. Taken together therefore all this evidence makes it probable that there is a God. The occurrence of evil, whether produced by humans or natural processes, does not significantly diminish that probability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271672.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Swinburne, R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Swinburne, Richard
Venue
Philosophical Books
Published
2004-03-25
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
16-17
ISSN
0031-8051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169392938
Cited by
916
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 41
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Philosophical Books (publishedVersion)
  • Analysis Claves de Pensamiento Contemporáneo (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Theology and Philosophy of Evil
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
existence of God, theism, proof of God's existence, arguments against the existence of God, probability of evidence, prior knowledge, problem of evil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review