The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constructions of Neoliberal Reason
Abstract
Abstract Amongst intellectuals and activists, neoliberalism has become a potent signifier for the kind of free-market thinking that has dominated politics for the past three decades. Forever associated with the conviction politics of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, the free-market project has since become synonymous with the ‘Washington Consensus’ on international development policy and the phenomenon of corporate globalization, where it has come to mean privatization, deregulation, and the opening up of new markets. But beyond its utility as a protest slogan as a shorthand signifier for the political-economic Zeitgeist, what do we know about where neoliberalism came from and how it spread? Who are the neoliberals, and why do they studiously avoid the label? This book presents a radical critique of the free-market project, from its origins in the first half of the 20th century through to its near-death experience in the recent global economic crisis, from the utopian dreams of Friedrich von Hayek, through the dogmatic theories of Milton Friedman and the Chicago School, to the hope and hubris of Obamanomics. The book traces how neoliberalism went from crank science to common sense in the period between the Great Depression and the age of Obama. It is an exploration of the antisocial life of the free-market project, examined in its cradles of invention and in its zones of extension and contestation. In the process, the book elaborates (and puts to work) an understanding of neoliberalism as an adaptive, unevenly developed regulatory project.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism
Lees, L. (2012) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132511412998 · Cited by 403
Questioning tales of ‘ordinary magic’: ‘Resilience’ and neo-liberal reasoning
Michael Garrett, P. (2016) · British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv017 · Cited by 171
Exploring a Customer Orientation: Free-Market Logic and College Students
Saunders, D. B. (2014) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2014.0013 · Cited by 71
Political consumerism as a neoliberal response to youth political disengagement
Kyroglou, G., & Henn, M. (2017) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc7040034 · Cited by 40
Korea and Taiwan: The Crisis of Investment-Led Growth and the End of the Developmental State
Pirie, I. (2018) · Journal of Contemporary Asia · doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1375136 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Peck, J.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-10-28
- OpenAlex
- W1487575620
- Cited by
- 1,914
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 133.56
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580576.001.0001
- The paper
- Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199580576.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.