The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Inquiring Mind
Abstract
Jason Baehr presents a new theory of 'responsibilist' or character-based virtue-epistemology - an approach in which intellectual character traits are given a central and fundamental role.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These kinds of assignments contribute to the development of students' intellectual autonomy, intellectual carefulness, intellectual thoroughness, and attentiveness (Baehr, 2011) since the development of such virtues depends on their exercise.”
From ChatGPT and the Technology-Education Tension: Applying Contextual Virtue Epistemology to a Cognitive Artifact (2024) · cites this paper as Baehr, 2011
In the citing paper
“In this kind of activity, the artifact offers a complementary contribution to the exercise of the epistemic virtue of intellectual autonomy; namely, the willingness and ability to think for oneself (Baehr, 2011;Heersmink, 2018).”
From ChatGPT and the Technology-Education Tension: Applying Contextual Virtue Epistemology to a Cognitive Artifact (2024) · cites this paper as Baehr, 2011
In the citing paper
“Thus, I applied this framework to ChatGPT, characterized as a cognitive artifact that can be used to substitute, complement, or constitute the students' cognitive abilities in an embedded or extended way and that can elicit the exercise of relevant intellectual virtues (Baehr, 2011).”
From ChatGPT and the Technology-Education Tension: Applying Contextual Virtue Epistemology to a Cognitive Artifact (2024) · cites this paper as Baehr, 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations
Whitcomb, D., Battaly, H., Baehr, J., & Howard‐Snyder, D. (2017) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12228 · Cited by 610
Self-citationCognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility
Leary, M. R., Diebels, K. J., Davisson, E. K., Jongman-Sereno, K. P., Isherwood, J. C., Raimi, K. T., Deffler, S. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217697695 · Cited by 539
Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J. (2017) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1167938 · Cited by 200
Distinguishing intellectual humility and general humility
Davis, D. E., Rice, K., McElroy, S., DeBlaere, C., Choe, E., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Hook, J. N. (2016) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2015.1048818 · Cited by 134
Zachry, C. E., Phan, L. V., Blackie, L. E. R., & Jayawickreme, E. (2018) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gby016 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Baehr, J.
- Corresponding author
- Baehr, Jason
- ORCID
- Baehr, Jason
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W2503156317
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 17.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- virtue epistemology, responsibilism, intellectual character, intellectual virtues, inquiry, epistemic responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
