Cited by 284Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesLegal Rights and Human RightsDiscrimination and Equality Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality

Klatt, Matthias, Meister, Moritz·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction 1. The Structure of the Proportionality Test 2. Rights, Interests, and Trumps 3. The Method of Balancing 4. Discretion and Deference 5. Positive Rights and Proportionality Analysis 6. Epistemic Reliabilities in Proportionality Analysis 7. Case Analysis: Otto-Preminger-Institut v Austria 8. Results

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing
Urbina, F. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316796276 · Cited by 110
Surveying the Geneva impasse: Coercive care and human rights
Martin, W., & Gurbai, S. (2019) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.03.001 · Cited by 104
“One familiar legal response to such circumstances is to engage in a proportionality exercise: compromises on some rights may be permitted if the policy adopted is a proportionate measure for protecting one or more fundamental rights (see for example: Klatt & Meister, 2012).”
Background
On Tiles and Pillars: EU Citizenship as a Federal Denominator
Kochenov, D. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139680714.003 · Cited by 70
Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act?
Sauter, W. (2013) · Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies · doi:10.5235/152888713809813611 · Cited by 62
Proportionality – A New Mega Standard in European Copyright Law
Afori, O. F. (2014) · GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil · doi:10.1007/s40319-014-0272-1 · Cited by 56
Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy
Henckels, C. (2015) · Cited by 56
European Migration Law
Thym, D. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Europe's Passive Virtues
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.001.0001 · Cited by 52
Positive rights: Who decides? Judicial review in balance
Klatt, M. (2015) · International Journal of Constitutional Law · doi:10.1093/icon/mov019 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Core Socio-Economic Rights and the European Court of Human Rights
Leijten, I. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108182539 · Cited by 38
The Presumption of Proportionality
Rivers, J. (2014) · Modern Law Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12072 · Cited by 37
Making the Essence of Fundamental Rights Real: The Court of Justice of the European Union Clarifies the Structure of Fundamental Rights under the Charter
Ojanen, T. (2016) · European Constitutional Law Review · doi:10.1017/s1574019616000225 · Cited by 35
Human Rights and State Sovereignty
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0006 · Cited by 35
Human Dignity and Proportionality: Deontic Pluralism in Balancing
Kumm, M., & Walen, A. D. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107565272.006 · Cited by 32
The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence
Sudmann, A. (2019) · AI critique · doi:10.14361/9783839447192 · Cited by 55
The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence
Sudmann, A. (2019) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839447192 · Cited by 23
International Deference, The Vague National Margin of Appreciation and Procedural Review
García-Roca, J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72798-7_13 · Cited by 22
Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion in European Union Law
Aranguiz, A. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003222125 · Cited by 22
Inducing Immunity? Justifying Immunization Policies in Times of Vaccine Hesitancy
Pierik, R., & Verweij, M. F. (2024) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/15307.001.0001 · Cited by 20
Economic Sanctions and Human Rights: Quantifying the Legal Proportionality PrinciplePreprint
Gutmann, J., Neuenkirch, M., Neumeier, F., et al. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3175885 · Cited by 20
On the Loss of Rights
Webber, G. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107565272.009 · Cited by 19
Balancing competences: How institutional cosmopolitanism can manage jurisdictional conflicts
Klatt, M. (2015) · Global Constitutionalism · doi:10.1017/s2045381715000039 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Proportionality in Its Narrow Sense and Measuring the Intensity of Restrictions on Fundamental Rights
Sampaio, J. S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89647-2_4 · Cited by 18
Is it Really That Easy? A Critique of Proportionality and ‘Balancing as Reasoning’
Urbina, F. J. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence · doi:10.1017/s0841820900006275 · Cited by 15
Doing Good Together: Competition Law and the Political Legitimacy of Interfirm Cooperation
Claassen, R. J. G., & Gerbrandy, A. (2018) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2018.2 · Cited by 15
“Balancing interests is inherent in the widely used legal proportionality test and is thus commonplace in legal reasoning, for example, in human rights litigation (Klatt and Meister 2012).”
Background
Proportionality and Justification
Klatt, M. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190889050.003.0008 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Normative Criteria and Their Inclusion in a Regulatory Framework for New Plant Varieties Derived From Genome Editing
Hamburger, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00176 · Cited by 16
“The proportionality principle is enshrined in a wide variety of legal systems worldwide (Sweet and Mathews, 2008, p. 74–75, 112–60; Klatt and Meister, 2012, p. 1–3).”
Background
‘Paedophile Hunters’, Criminal Procedure, and Fundamental Human Rights
Purshouse, J. (2020) · Journal of Law and Society · doi:10.1111/jols.12235 · Cited by 14
Vaccination Policies: Between Best and Basic Interests of the Child, between Precaution and Proportionality
Pierik, R. (2020) · Public Health Ethics · doi:10.1093/phe/phaa008 · Cited by 13
Constitutionalism and the Paradox of Principles and Rules
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.001.0001 · Cited by 12
O PROFETA, OS DISCÍPULOS E O “ENVIADO”: COMENTÁRIOS A VIRGÍLIO AFONSO DA SILVA
Neves, M. (2019) · REI - REVISTA ESTUDOS INSTITUCIONAIS · doi:10.21783/rei.v5i1.320 · Cited by 11
Ethical, Social and Policy Aspects of Forensic Genetics: A Systematic Review
Williams, R., & Wienroth, M. (2014) · Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) · Cited by 9
Beyond Reasonableness: The Dignitarian Structure of Human and Constitutional Rights
Möller, K. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence · doi:10.1017/cjlj.2021.9 · Cited by 8
Impoverishment of the Poor and Derogation of Human Rights During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Testing the Emergency Measure and Siracusa Principles in Large-Scale Social Restriction
Tampubolon, M. (2021) · Journal of Human Rights and Social Work · doi:10.1007/s41134-021-00174-0 · Cited by 8
Más allá del principio de proporcionalidad
Comella, V. F. (2020) · Revista Derecho del Estado · doi:10.18601/01229893.n46.07 · Cited by 8
To Balance or Not to Balance: The Quest for the Essence of Rights
Sieckmann, J. (2021) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77321-2_5 · Cited by 7
The case for replicable structured full proportionality analysis in all cases concerning fundamental rights
Ramshaw, A. (2018) · Legal Studies · doi:10.1017/lst.2018.18 · Cited by 7
Online Exhaustion and the Boundaries of Interpretation
Spedicato, G. A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44648-5_2 · Cited by 7
The Quest for Proportionality for the European Arrest Warrant: Fundamental Rights Protection in a Mutual Recognition Environment
Xanthopoulou, E. (2015) · New Journal of European Criminal Law · doi:10.1177/203228441500600104 · Cited by 7
The Origins and the Potential Federalising Effects of the Substance of Rights Test
van den Brink, M. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139680714.004 · Cited by 7
Proportionality review in administrative law
Mathews, J. (2017) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781784718671.00034 · Cited by 7
From Constitutional Discretion to the Positivist Weight Formula
Duarte, D. (2021) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77321-2_2 · Cited by 7
Introduction
Huscroft, G., Miller, B. W., & Webber, G. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107565272.002 · Cited by 7
The Impasse of Constitutional Rights
Weinrib, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009010078 · Cited by 6
Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224 · Cited by 6
Brute Balancing, Proportionality and Meta-Weighing of Reasons
Sampaio, J. S. (2021) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77321-2_3 · Cited by 6
Balancing, Proportionality and Constitutional Rights
Bongiovanni, G., & Valentini, C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9452-0_20 · Cited by 7
Toward a Theory of Reasonableness
Mangini, M. (2018) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12205 · Cited by 6
When Trumps Clash: Dworkin and the Doctrine of Proportionality
Weinrib, J. (2017) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12166 · Cited by 6
Raz on Rights: Human Rights, Fundamental Rights, and Balancing
Zanghellini, A. (2017) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12156 · Cited by 6
“…the idea that within each constitutional rights “something like a ‘center of resistance’ exists which … [protects] minimum core contents of rights”, so that “[v]ery serious interferences can hardly ever be justified by raising the weight of the justifying reasons” (Klatt and Meister 2012a, 68).”
Framing Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights Law: Mediating between the Abstract and the Concrete
Stoyanova, V. (2023) · Human Rights Law Review · doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngad010 · Cited by 5
Is the Structure of Human Rights Practice Defensible? Three Puzzles and Their Resolution
Kumm, M. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316691724.004 · Cited by 5
Dark side of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality: the case of mandatory vaccination
Horák, F., & Dienstbier, J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-108998 · Cited by 6
“21 35 Any assessment of the weight of individual arguments is also strongly affected by the prior understanding of those performing the balancing exercise.”
The Ongoing Search for Legitimacy: Can a ‘Pragmatic yet Principled’ Deliberative Model Justify the Authority of Constitutional Courts?
de Bustamante, T. D. R. (2015) · Modern Law Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12120 · Cited by 4
Limits on Constitutional Rights: The Marginal Role of Proportionality Analysis
Moon, R. J. (2017) · Israel Law Review · doi:10.1017/s0021223716000327 · Cited by 4
Conflicting Norms, Values, and Interests: A Perspective from Legal Academia
Oeter, S. (2019) · Ethics & International Affairs · doi:10.1017/s089267941800093x · Cited by 4
Criteria to scrutinize new rights: protecting rights against artificial proliferation
Netto, L. (2021) · Revista de Investigações Constitucionais · doi:10.5380/rinc.v8i1.82654 · Cited by 8
The Portuguese Charter of Human Rights in the Digital Age
Farinho, D. S. (2021) · Revista Española de la Transparencia · doi:10.51915/ret.191 · Cited by 4
Discretion, Automation, and Proportionality
Enqvist, L., & Naarttijärvi, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30142-1_7 · Cited by 9
The Bite of Rights in Paternalism
Paulo, N. (2015) · Library of ethics and applied philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17960-5_9 · Cited by 4
RIGHTS AS TRUMPS AND BALANCING: RECONCILING THE RRECONCILABLE?
Neto, J. C. (2015) · Revista Direito GV · doi:10.1590/1808-2432201508 · Cited by 4
ALCANCE Y LÍMITES DEL PRINCIPIO DE PROPORCIONALIDAD
Martínez-Villalba, J. C. R. (2016) · Revista Chilena de Derecho · doi:10.4067/s0718-34372016000100012 · Cited by 4
Restricting access to AI decision-making in the public interest: The justificatory role of proportionality and its balancing factors
Warthon, M. (2024) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2024.3.1801 · Cited by 4
Making Legal Knowledge Work: Practising Proportionality in the German Repetitorium
Bomhoff, J. (2022) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639221092962 · Cited by 3
Uninormative conflicts in the general theory of normative conflicts
Azevedo, S. (2024) · Revus · doi:10.4000/12nib · Cited by 3
Judicial review and institutional balance
Klatt, M. (2019) · Revus · doi:10.4000/revus.5180 · Cited by 3
“21 Klatt & Meister 2012b: 135-146.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
The Contemporary Significance of the Principle of Proportionality in Tax Law
Mudrecki, A. (2021) · Białostockie Studia Prawnicze · doi:10.15290/bsp.2021.26.04.03 · Cited by 3
A Máxima da Proporcionalidade: um elemento estrutural do constitucionalismo global
Klatz, M., Meister, M., & Neto, J. C. (2014) · Observatório da Jurisdição Constitucional · doi:10.11117/1982-4564.07.02 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
A NEW STRATOSPHERE? INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION AS ‘INTERNATIONALIZED PUBLIC LAW’
Foster, C. E. (2015) · International and Comparative Law Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0020589315000135 · Cited by 3
Free Speech versus Religious Feelings, the Sequel: Defamation of the Prophet Muhammad in E.S. v Austria
Smet, S. (2019) · European Constitutional Law Review · doi:10.1017/s157401961900004x · Cited by 3
Judicial Review and Institutional Balance: Comments on Dimitrios KyritsisPreprint
Klatt, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3281101 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Fundamental notions
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0002 · Cited by 2
Proportionality Test and Constitutional Social Rights
Fazio, F. D. (2021) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77321-2_8 · Cited by 2
Konstytucja jako źródło obowiązków państwa w stosunku do obywatela
Florczak‐Wątor, M. (2018) · Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny · doi:10.14746/rpeis.2018.80.1.11 · Cited by 2
Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap UUD NRI 1945 (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dan Jerman)
Rugian, I. A. (2021) · Jurist-Diction · doi:10.20473/jd.v4i4.28482 · Cited by 2
A Bayesian Improvement of the Proportionality Principle
Pečarič, M. (2022) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.12366 · Cited by 2
Proportionality Principle in the CJEU Judgments on Tax Cases
Beshi, S., & Susuri, D. (2023) · Lex Portus · doi:10.26886/2524-101x.9.4.2023.3 · Cited by 2
“As Klatt and Meister (2012) have correctly stated, several uncertainties concerning the principle of proportionality test originate from the absence of precise recognition and explanation of the variables that affect the weighing procedure.”
Background
How to Assess Rule-of-Law Violations in a State of Emergency? Towards a General Analytical Framework
Szente, Z. (2024) · Hague Journal on the Rule of Law · doi:10.1007/s40803-024-00244-1 · Cited by 2
“…that the normal functioning of the legislature does not in itself make government by decree superfluous or unjustified, although this situation may 40 For more details on these standards, see Klatt and Meister (2012); Barak (2012); Huscroft, Miller and Webber (2014); Jackson and Tushnet (2017).”
TRÊS DIMENSÕES DAS POSTURAS AUTOCONTIDAS
Leal, M. C. H., & Schoenherr, M. H. (2024) · REI - REVISTA ESTUDOS INSTITUCIONAIS · doi:10.21783/rei.v10i3.807 · Cited by 2
Republican Theory and the EU: Emergency Laws and Constitutional Challenges
Herlin‐Karnell, E. (2021) · Jus Cogens · doi:10.1007/s42439-021-00044-3 · Cited by 2
“The scholarship on the pros and cons of proportionality is vast, see, e.g., A Barak 2012, Klatt and Meister 2012, K Möller 2012, R Alexy 2002, G Webber 2009, M Cohen-Eliya and Porrat 2013, M Klatt 2019.”
Background
The “Doctrine of Principles” in Neo-Constitutional Theories and the Principle of Reasonableness in Action
Vanna, F. D. (2015) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19180-5_5 · Cited by 2
A Corte Constitucional sul-africana e os direitos fundamentais: um paradigma a ser seguido?
Neto, J. C. (2014) · Observatório da Jurisdição Constitucional · doi:10.11117/1982-4564.07.10 · Cited by 2
Proportionality, Rights, and Legitimate Interests
Urbina, F. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316796276.005 · Cited by 2
Para além da subsunção e do sopesamento: uma crítica à teoria da proporcionalidade a partir do caso da liberdade de expressão | Beyond subsumption and balancing: a critique of proportionality theory from the case of freedom of speech
Ribeiro, C. G. (2019) · Revista Publicum · doi:10.12957/publicum.2019.30353 · Cited by 2
Securing decent incomes at a crossroads: On the legal feasibility of a Framework Directive on Minimum Income
Aranguiz, A. (2020) · European Journal of Social Security · doi:10.1177/1388262720968175 · Cited by 2
Case Management from a Comparative Perspective: Horizontal and Vertical Court Arrangements
Ragone, Á. P. (2021) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4512-6_3 · Cited by 4
The Contextual Nature of Proportionality and Its Relation with the Intensity of Judicial Review
Sampaio, J. S. (2015) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18549-1_10 · Cited by 2
The Protection Against Crime as a Human Right: Positive Obligations of the Police
Xenos, D. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71339-7_10 · Cited by 2
Legal Science: The Demarcation Problem and the Perimeter of “Good Science”
Duarte, D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18671-5_9 · Cited by 2
When Trumps Clash: Dworkin and the Doctrine of ProportionalityPreprint
Weinrib, J. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2832405 · Cited by 2
The Power of Comparative Constitutional Law Reasoning in European Criminal Law Procedure
Herlin‐Karnell, E. (2019) · ICL Journal · doi:10.1515/icl-2018-0047 · Cited by 1
El principio de proporcionalidad en contextos de incertidumbre: Insuficiencias y posibles soluciones a la luz de la COVID-19
Barroso, B. S. (2023) · Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional · doi:10.18042/cepc/redc.128.02 · Cited by 1
O Teste da Proporcionalidade no Tribunal Constitucional do Peru e no Supremo Tribunal Federal
Filho, A. P. G., & Guidolin, R. V. (2023) · Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia · doi:10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13607 · Cited by 1
Internet blocking and shutdowns in India and international human rights law
Prakash, P. (2024) · Indian Public Policy Review · doi:10.55763/ippr.2024.05.03.002 · Cited by 1
On Proportionality, Legal Principles and Proportionality as a Legal Principle
Ostrowska, M. (2025) · AIDA Europe research series on insurance law and regulation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82267-4_2 · Cited by 1
A Default Model of Normative Risk for the EU AI Act
García-Godínez, M. (2025) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-025-00207-5 · Cited by 1
“…with regards to the implementation of AI risk manage - ment measures), the proportionality test is designed to provide legal authorities (e.g., a constitutional court of justice) with quantitative reasons for determining the legiti - macy of a legal norm (see, e.g., Klatt & Meister, 2012 , Ch3).”
JUDICIÁRIO E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS: UM EXEMPLO POSITIVO
Pamplona, D. A., & de Mesquita, E. M. (2015) · Novos Estudos Jurídicos · doi:10.14210/nej.v20n3.p885-906 · Cited by 1
Proportionality and deference in theoretical perspective
Henckels, C. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316104378.002 · Cited by 1
The Incommensurability Objection
Urbina, F. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316796276.003 · Cited by 1
A Final Argument in Favour of Proportionality
Neto, J. A. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1_7 · Cited by 1

Authors: Klatt, M., & Meister, M.
ORCID: Klatt, Matthias
Venue: Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 2012-07-26
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001
OpenAlex: W595331111
Cited by: 283
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI: 13.63
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
Keywords: proportionality test, constitutional law, balancing test, administrative discretion, judicial deference, positive rights, epistemic reliability, European Court of Human Rights, fundamental rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks