Cited by 284Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesLegal Rights and Human RightsDiscrimination and Equality Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality

Klatt, Matthias, Meister, Moritz·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction 1. The Structure of the Proportionality Test 2. Rights, Interests, and Trumps 3. The Method of Balancing 4. Discretion and Deference 5. Positive Rights and Proportionality Analysis 6. Epistemic Reliabilities in Proportionality Analysis 7. Case Analysis: Otto-Preminger-Institut v Austria 8. Results

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Items 101–200 of 284

Judicial Review e Equilíbrio Institucional: Comentários a Dimitrios Kyritsis | Judicial review and institutional balance: Comments on Dimitrios Kyritsis
Klatt, M. (2019) · Revista Publicum · doi:10.12957/publicum.2019.45588 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Introduction
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0001 · Cited by 2
Rebutting Four Arguments in Favour of Resolving ius cogens Norm Conflicts by Means of Proportionality Tests
Jeutner, V. (2020) · Nordic Journal of International Law · doi:10.1163/15718107-89030011 · Cited by 1
MARGEM DE APRECIAÇÃO E DEFERÊNCIA DA JURISDIÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL
Filho, A. P. G., & Moreira, B. M. (2021) · Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito · doi:10.5752/p.2318-7999.2021v24n47p380-395 · Cited by 1
O controle jurídico da omissão estatal pela norma da proporcionalidade
de Almeida, L. A. F. (2021) · Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas · doi:10.5020/2317-2150.2021.11051 · Cited by 1
Rechtsstaat
Klatt, M. (2021) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05639-9_58 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Arqueologia e história do princípio da proporcionalidade
Sampaio, J. A. L. (2022) · Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] · doi:10.18593/ejjl.29621 · Cited by 1
Problemas abiertos en torno al principio de proporcionalidad: un análisis desde el DIDH y el DIH
Velásquez-Cardona, P. A., Fetiva, C. H. P., Arévalo-Ramírez, W., et al. (2024) · Escuela Militar de Cadetes "General Jose María Córdova" eBooks · doi:10.21830/9786289544671 · Cited by 1
De la proporcionalidad y otros demonios: el origen del principio de proporcionalidad y su adaptación en el orden jurídico colombiano
Arango-Díaz, A.-M. (2024) · Escuela Militar de Cadetes "General Jose María Córdova" eBooks · doi:10.21830/9786289544671.03 · Cited by 1
Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Constitutional Theory and Intergenerational Equity
Ribeiro, G. D. A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65296-7_1 · Cited by 1
Conflictos uninormativos en la teoría general de los conflictos normativos
Azevedo, S. (2024) · Revus · doi:10.4000/130p5 · Cited by 1
Proportionality Test: From the Court to the Legislator
Devitskii, E. (2024) · Academic Law Journal · doi:10.17150/1819-0928.2024.25(3).405-415 · Cited by 1
The Question of Trust in EU Criminal Law Cooperation: A Constitutional Perspective
Herlin‐Karnell, E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73857-4_7 · Cited by 1
Reflexión sobre la criminalización del enriquecimiento ilícito en Brasil: un análisis de la legitimidad constitucional y dogmático penal del proyecto de ley 4850/2016
Scalcon, R. L., & Giuliani, E. M. (2018) · Nuevo Foro Penal · doi:10.17230/nfp.14.90.6 · Cited by 1
Resolving the Question of Inter-Scalar Legitimacy into Law? A Hard Look at Proportionality Balancing in Global Governance
Kuo, M. (2018) · Leiden Journal of International Law · doi:10.1017/s0922156518000390 · Cited by 1
Collateral Damage and the Enemy
Sari, A., & Tinkler, K. (2018) · British Yearbook of International Law · doi:10.1093/bybil/brz004 · Cited by 1
As medidas legais de controle da COVID-19 (isolamento, quarentena e tratamento de saúde compulsório) e sua proporcionalidade
de Almeida, L. A. F. (2020) · A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativoe & Constitucional · doi:10.21056/aec.v20i80.1338 · Cited by 1
LIBERDADE (<=S=>) EM DISCRICIONARIEDADE?! RESTRIÇÕES AO DIREITO DE LIBERDADE NO CONTEXTO PANDÊMICO
Chaves, A., & de Pádua, T. A. (2020) · Novos Estudos Jurídicos · doi:10.14210/nej.v25n3.p674-703 · Cited by 1
Positive Rights: Who Decides? Judicial Review in Balance
Klatt, M. (2021) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77321-2_7 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
PRINSIP PROPORSIONALITAS DALAM KEBIJAKAN ASIMILASI DAN INTEGRASI NARAPIDANA PADA MASA PANDEMI PANDEMI COVID-19
Baihaki, M. R., & Nurhalimah, S. (2020) · Majalah Hukum Nasional · doi:10.33331/mhn.v50i2.78 · Cited by 1
행정법상 비례원칙에 관한 연구
Jeong, E. (2020) · ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JOURNAL · doi:10.35979/alj.2020.11.63.203 · Cited by 1
Consensus, Stasis, Evolution
Djeffal, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108564779.005 · Cited by 1
The Legality of Public Pension Reforms in Times of Financial Crisis
Diliagka, D. (2018) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783845291574 · Cited by 1
Common European Asylum System
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0014 · Cited by 1
The National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: In Search of a Balance Between Democracy and Rights in the International SpherePreprint
Vila, M. I. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3263444 · Cited by 1
Anchoring a subsidiarity and proportionality review by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the context of residency rights and shared competence : a legal, doctrinal and critical analysis
Shaw, K. (2015) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · Cited by 1
Making Legal Knowledge Work: Practising Proportionality in the German RepetitoriumPreprint
Bomhoff, J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4063284 · Cited by 1
Proportionality Test
Sobek, T., & Montag, J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_721-1 · Cited by 1
The Protection Against Crime as a Human Right: Positive Obligations of the PolicePreprint
Xenos, D. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3183278 · Cited by 1
Human rights, specification and communities of inquiry
Allard‐Tremblay, Y. (2015) · Global Constitutionalism · doi:10.1017/s2045381715000052
Direitos sociais e proporcionalidade: análise da doutrina e da jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal
Groterhorst, R. (2016) · doi:10.11606/d.2.2016.tde-12112015-140829
Igual consideração e respeito, independência ética e liberdade de expressão em Dworkin : uma reconciliação entre igualdade e liberdade e a possibilidade do discurso do ódio em um ordenamento coerente de princípios
Ramalho, A. L. N. (2016) · doi:10.26512/2016.04.d.20739
Faculdade de Direito - USP e Escola de Direito (FGV-SP) GRUPOS DE ESTUDOS EM TEORIA GERAL E FILOSOFIA DO DIREITO (FDUSP) GRUPO INTERINSTITUCIONAL DE FILOSOFIA E TEORIA DO DIREITO (FDUSP-FGV)
Porto, R., & Macêdo (2016)
Fundamental rights: liberty
Moeckli, D. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316650875.005
The moral structure of proportionality
Weinrib, J. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316026663.007
TRIBUTAÇÃO E ORDEM ECONÔMICA: OS TRIBUTOS PODEM SER UTILIZADOS COMO INSTRUMENTOS DE INDUÇÃO ECONÔMICA?
Caliendo, P. (2016) · Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia
Taking the evolution of legal doctrine seriously: review of Katayoun Baghai,Social Systems Theory and Judicial Review: Taking Jurisprudence Seriously(Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. 188 pp. £65/£58.50)
Nobles, R., & Schiff, D. (2017) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552316000434
The Maximisation Account of Proportionality
Urbina, F. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316796276.002
The Normative Debate on Balancing
Petersen, N. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823330.003
Proporcionalidade – insuficiências morais e teóricas
Murata, D. P. (2017) · Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea · doi:10.21875/tjc.v1i2.7375
ALCANCE E LIMITES DO PRINCÍPIO DA PROPORCIONALIDADE
Martínez, J. C. P. (2017) · Revista Paradigma
Avrupa Birliği Hukuku Kapsamında Göç Yönetişimi, Yetkilendirme, Yetki İkamesi ve Ölçülülük İlkesi
Aliu, A., Oğurlu, Y., Özkan, Ö., et al. (2017) · Research Journal of Politics Economics and Management · doi:10.25272/j.2147-7035.2017.5.3.07
Ponderação, otimização e democracia: parâmetros dogmáticos para o controle judicial de constitucionalidade da legislação restritiva de direitos fundamentais
da Silva, J. G. (2017) · doi:10.11606/d.2.2017.tde-10122020-211255
The Concepts of Non-Domination and Justification in EU Security-Related Context
Herlin‐Karnell, E. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190889050.003.0012
ACCESO A DOCUMENTOS E INFORMACIÓN DE LA BANCA CENTRAL EN EL DERECHO COMPARADO: EL CASO DE ESTADOS UNIDOS Y LA UNIÓN EUROPEA
Quintero, R. G., & Lamus, A. S. (2018) · Revista Chilena de Derecho · doi:10.4067/s0718-34372018000100215
Internet Traffic Management Under EU Regulation 2015/2120 – The Need for the Co-operation of Legal and Computer Scientists
Nałęcz, A. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99981-4_9
A Constitutional Court Looking for Justification
Neto, J. A. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1_6
A System of Rules and Principles
Neto, J. A. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1_4
The Principles-Theory Variant of Proportionality
Neto, J. A. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1_3
A Charter of Rights with Wide Scope
Neto, J. A. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1_5
O exercício da jurisdição interamericana de direitos humanos: legitimidade, problemas e possíveis soluções
Ferreira, F. G., Cabral, G. P., & de Laurentiis, L. C. (2019) · Revista de Direito Internacional · doi:10.5102/rdi.v16i2.5985
La utilidad de la fórmula del peso de Robert Alexy y su aplicación a la Decisión del Tribunal Constitucional alemán de 2015 sobre la integración de profesoras funcionarias musulmanas
ICHASO, M. E. (2020) · Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez · doi:10.30827/acfs.v54i0.8119
Rechtssichere Gewichtung von Eingriff und Rechtfertigung in der verfassungsrechtlichen Abwägung
Wekel, C. (2020) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748906841
A JUDICIALIZAÇÃO DO DIREITO À SAÚDE E A NORMA DE PROPORCIONALIDADE: O PROBLEMA DOS MEDICAMENTOS E SERVIÇOS NÃO INCORPORADOS NO SISTEMA ÚNICO DE SAÚDE E DOS MEDICAMENTOS SEM REGISTRO NA AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNCIA SANITÁRIA
de Almeida, L. A. F. (2020) · Revista Direito Estado e Sociedade · doi:10.17808/des.55.901
Proportionality and Its Discontents
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0006
Decentralized Judicial Review
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0005
The Rise of Deference
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0003
The New Free Movement Architecture
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0002
Discovering Passive Virtues
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0007
The Margin of Appreciation
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0004
Limiting Procedural Rights During Police Interrogation in Terror Crimes: A Comparative Analysis of European and U.S. Laws and Suggestions to Turkish Law
Soyaslan, G. (2020) · Journal of Penal Law and Criminology / Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi · doi:10.26650/jplc2020-0001
“…in his place would ensure that the suspect gives a statement under his free will, his defense rights are not disregarded, and any attempts to interfere with counterterrorism are thwarted (Barak, 2012, pp. 245, 255-256, 268- 269, 303, 305; Klatt & Meister, 2012, p. 8; Schlink, 2012, pp. 722-725).”
Background
Proporcionalidade: reflexos e possibilidades na dinâmica da separação de poderes
Pinheiro, G. C. (2019) · doi:10.11606/d.2.2019.tde-17072020-154457
KONSTITUSIONALITAS PASAL-PASAL KECELAKAAN PESAWAT UDARA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PENERBANGAN
Septian, I. F., & Akbar, A. F. (2020) · Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia · doi:10.54629/jli.v17i3.632
Levando os direitos das crianças a sério: a absoluta prioridade dos direitos fundamentais e melhor interesse da criança
Hartung, P. A. D. (2019) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.2.2019.tde-04092020-174138 · Cited by 2
The risk-based approach in practice
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0008
Changes of regulatory models
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Conclusions
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0009
Risk and the risk-based approach
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0007
Data protection as command and control regulation
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0003
Issues with data protection as command and control regulation
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0004
Meta regulation in data protection law: the risk-based approach
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0006 · Cited by 1
About the Fair Balance of Competing Rights in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Spirchez, G. B., & Bârsan-Pipu, N. (2020) · Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.24193/tras.si2020.7
“…is a convincing structural approach in the legal reasoning, destined to promote the balance of principles, or as other authors appreciate (Klatt and Meister, 2012, p. 708) ‘proportionality and balancing are the most sophisticated means to solve the very complex and intricate collision of…”
Background
Poder de Polícia em Tempos de Pandemia: Proporcionalidade nas Restrições Impostas ao Direito de Ir e Vir? Uma Abordagem Interdisciplinar
Schirato, V. R. (2020) · RDAI | Revista de Direito Administrativo e Infraestrutura · doi:10.48143/rdai.14.vrs
Una versión racionalizada de la doctrina del margen de apreciación estatal
Vila, M. I. (2021) · Discusiones · doi:10.52292/j.dsc.2016.2494
Constitutional Implications in Australia
Dixon, R., & Appleby, G. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108277914.012
Die Abwägung von Rechtsprinzipien
Klatt, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21086-1_36-1
Self-citation
A Constitutional Theory of Intergenerational Equity
Ribeiro, G. D. A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53265-9_20
The twilight of the separation of powers: Proportionality as a method of solving institutional issues
Hapla, M. (2021) · Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1556/2052.2020.00227 · Cited by 1
Final Comment
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.003.0006
Introduction
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.003.0001
From Classic Distinctions Between Legal Principles and Rules
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.003.0002
To the Search of Another Model of Difference Between Constitutional Principles and Rules
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.003.0004
(Part III) - A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing
Urbina, F. J. (2017)
Proteção estatal suficiente do meio ambiente por meio da responsabilidade civil
de Souza, A. A. (2020) · doi:10.11606/t.2.2020.tde-30032021-143206
The Use and Abuse of Principles
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.003.0005
Through the Still Dominant Models of Division Between Constitutional Principles and Rules
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.003.0003
Proportionality Test and Constitutional Social Rights
Fazio, F. D. (2021) · Archiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie · doi:10.25162/arsp-2021-0012
Expulsão de estrangeiro: repensando um instituto antigo
Nogueira, N. P. (2020) · doi:10.11606/d.2.2020.tde-09052021-211917
The Nature and Purpose of the Corporation in Law
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.003
The Justification for and Contours of a Multi-Factoral Approach
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.008
A Balancing Act – Proportionality in the Corporate Sphere
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.009
The State Duty to Protect Model
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.004
Bibliography
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.013
The Direct Obligations Model
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.007
The Multi-Factoral Approach and Positive Obligations for Corporations
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.010
The Question of Substantive Corporate Obligations for Fundamental Rights
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.002
Preface
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.001
Index
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.014
Embedding the Multi-Factoral Approach in Corporations: The Role of Corporate Law
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.011
The Indirect Application Model
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.005

Authors: Klatt, M., & Meister, M.
ORCID: Klatt, Matthias
Venue: Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 2012-07-26
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001
OpenAlex: W595331111
Cited by: 283
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI: 13.63
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
Keywords: proportionality test, constitutional law, balancing test, administrative discretion, judicial deference, positive rights, epistemic reliability, European Court of Human Rights, fundamental rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks