The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality
Abstract
Introduction 1. The Structure of the Proportionality Test 2. Rights, Interests, and Trumps 3. The Method of Balancing 4. Discretion and Deference 5. Positive Rights and Proportionality Analysis 6. Epistemic Reliabilities in Proportionality Analysis 7. Case Analysis: Otto-Preminger-Institut v Austria 8. Results
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reasoning behind this step is strongly linked to the moral and political background of the individual arguments and the context of the given society. 21 35”
From Dark side of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality: the case of mandatory vaccination (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cited by
Items 201–284 of 284
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.006
Corporate Obligations in a Global World: The Role of International Mechanisms
Bilchitz, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108895224.012
Sobek, T., & Montag, J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_721-2
Los sistemas de reconocimiento facial: una mirada a la luz del examen de proporcionalidad
Trench, S. N. P. (2021) · Revista Internacional de Derecho Humanos · doi:10.26422/ridh.2022.1201.per
Ustavnopravna vprašanja kontrole cen naftnih derivatov
Zagorc, S. (2022) · Anali PAZU HD · doi:10.18690/analipazuhd.2.2.91-111.2016
Sustainability Labels in the Shadow of EU Competition Law
van der Zee, E. (2022) · Studies in European economic law and regulation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95802-2_5
Proportionality in Comparative LawPreprint
Bomhoff, J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4063283
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0001
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.003.0008
Proportionality: Measuring Impacts on Fundamental Rights
Sampaio, J. S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_838-1
Paulo, N. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-55734-6_5
Urbina, F. J. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316796276.001
Sobek, T., & Montag, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_721
(2019) · International Law Reports · doi:10.1017/9781108655149.003
Fair Is Foul, and Foul Is Fair
Ito, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264877.013
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.002.0008
Taking Proportionality Seriously: Guidelines for Designing the Standard of Proportionality in IndiaPreprint
Lakra, R. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4248827
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.002.0004
Neves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.002.0007
Die Abwägung von Rechtsprinzipien
Klatt, M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21085-4_36
Self-citationNeves, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898746.002.0005
Mursalim, M., Sidiq, R., & Hidayati, L. (2022) · doi:10.4108/eai.18-9-2022.2326038
Sánchez, P. F. (2023) · Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional · doi:10.18042/cepc/redc.127.04
Cantarelli, L. G. P. (2023) · Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito · doi:10.9771/rppgd.v33i0.53101
Association Agreements with Neighbours
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0018
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0010
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0016 · Cited by 1
Agencies (Frontex and Asylum Agency)
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0009
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0008
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.002.0008
General Features of EU Legislation
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0011
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0001
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.002.0004
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0012
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.002.0007
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0013
Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Methodology
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0005
Institutional Prerogatives and Decision-making
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0003
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.002.0009
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0015
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0017 · Cited by 1
Court of Justice: Achievements and Limitations
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0004
International Cooperation with Third States
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0019
Doctrinal Foundations of the Case Law
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0007
Building an Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice
Thym, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894274.003.0002
Cosmopolitanising Rights Practice
Shin, Y. J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264877.009
O constitucionalismo forte da América Latina
Paulo, L. M., & Filho, A. P. G. (2023) · Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas · doi:10.5102/rbpp.v13i2.8436
Direitos constitucionais, princípios formais e equilíbrio
Filho, A. P. G. (2023) · Revista de Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais · doi:10.18759/rdgf.v24i2.2178
Proportionality: Measuring Impacts on Fundamental Rights
Sampaio, J. S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_838
Kuner, C., & Greenleaf, G. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.002.0005
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.002.0009
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.002.0004
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.002.0006
Gellert, R. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837718.002.0008
(2024) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/15307.003.0014
Privacidade, segurança e tecnologia
Abreu, J. D. S. (2022) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.2.2022.tde-03102022-093648
Chalmers, D., Davies, G., Monti, G., et al. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009230322.016
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.002.0005
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.002.0010
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.002.0009
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.002.0004
Craig, P., & de Búrca, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.002.0006
Zglinski, J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844792.002.0011
Direito Constitucional na era da proporcionalidade (mas não na América?)
Canas, V. (2023) · RDAI | Revista de Direito Administrativo e Infraestrutura · doi:10.48143/rdai.26.canas
Zheng, M.-H. (2024) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035338375.00013
Letsas, G. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868143.026
Bellamy, R., & King, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868143.012
Competences and Formal Principles
Sieckmann, J. (2025) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96578-4_8
Sieckmann, J. (2025) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96578-4_6
Sieckmann, J. (2025) · Law and philosophy library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96578-4_11
Toward a Theory of Reasonableness
Mangini, M. (2025) · Philosophy and politics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02721-4_3
Moulin-Stożek, M., & du Plessis, G. (2025) · The International Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/13642987.2025.2602145
“Proportionality in its narrow sense means that the Court proceeds to balance between the restricted right and the legitimate aim only where no less restrictive alternatives exist (Klatt & Meister, 2012, pp. 8–10).”
Eid, E. P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13905-4_4
Sobek, T., & Montag, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76422-6_721
The Lisbon Way: An Alternative View on the Alexy‐Ratti Debate
Duarte, D., & Sampaio, J. S. (2026) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/raju.70012
“52 On the cumulativeness of proportionality, see Klatt and Meister 2012, 8, and Kumm 2006, 118.”
Analytical framework for sustainable competition enforcementPreprint
Kuusela, K. K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6654578
Transformationsprozesse und Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz
Bertel, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-73381-3_1
Metadata
- Authors
- Klatt, M., & Meister, M.
- ORCID
- Klatt, Matthias
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-07-26
- OpenAlex
- W595331111
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- proportionality test, constitutional law, balancing test, administrative discretion, judicial deference, positive rights, epistemic reliability, European Court of Human Rights, fundamental rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
