The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital DiscourseLanguage in the New Media
Open accessAbstract
In this chapter, I am concerned with the language ideologies present in — and expressed through — the metalinguistic discourse of Facebook’s “translations” application and the metalinguistic commentary of the Facebook “translators” as a community of what can be termed “language mavens” (Cameron, 1996), “language brokers” (Blommaert, 1999), or just “language workers” (Thurlow, 2007). Metalanguage is often understood simply as language about language, but, as Jaworski et al. (2004, p. 4) suggest, this is too literal a characterization for what they prefer to describe more broadly as any “language in the context of linguistic representations and evaluations.” Certainly, the individual “translators” of Facebook are engaged in policing language in the sense that Blommaert et al. (2009, p. 203) talk about the “production of ‘order’ — normatively organised and policed conduct.” Metalanguage thus inevitably works at an ideological level, influencing people’s actions and priorities in a number of often quite concrete ways. The case study I am presenting here offers an insight into the ways language ideologies are uniquely produced by the “community of translators” who are themselves also facilitated (and encouraged) by Facebook Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buchanan, I., Bourdieu, P., Raymond, G., & Adamson, M. (1993) · SubStance · doi:10.2307/3685295 · Cited by 3,018
Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity
Heller, M. (2003) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x · Cited by 968
Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography
Heller, M. S. (1999) · Cited by 937
Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer‐mediated communication
Androutsopoulos, J. (2006) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x · Cited by 576
Identity constructions in multilingual advertising
Piller, I. (2001) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404501002019 · Cited by 436
Advertising as Multilingual Communication
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2005) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230503014 · Cited by 348
The Multilingual Internet : Language, Culture, and Communication Online
Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (2007) · Cited by 277
Bilingualism as Ideology and Practice
Heller, M. (2007) · Bilingualism: A Social Approach · doi:10.1057/9780230596047_1 · Cited by 214
Grenoble, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434630802597763 · Cited by 147
Thurlow, C., & Aiello, G. (2007) · Visual Communication · doi:10.1177/1470357207081002 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Cited by
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016) · Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449787.009 · Cited by 401
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2019) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190519000102 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-10-26
- OpenAlex
- W2494525402
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 20.56
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital DiscourseLanguage in the New Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001
- The paper
- Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (2011). Digital DiscourseLanguage in the New Media. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199795437.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.