The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy
Abstract
Combining epistemological insights from Dignāga, Dharmakīrti, Śāntarakṣita, and Kamalaśīla, but also drawing on the work of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty and on recent work in analytic philosophy and phenomenology, this book defends the view that perception is intentionally constituted and, under certain circumstances, represents a type of implicit knowing that precludes (or at least minimizes) the possibility of error. The book also explores the classic debate between Buddhists philosophers and their opponents, principally the Naiyāyikas and the Mīmāmsakas, on such issues as establishing reliable means of belief formation, the relation between language and conceptual thought, and the structure of awareness. It also provides new ways of conceptualizing the Buddhist epistemological defence of the reflexivity thesis of consciousness, namely that each cognitive event is to be understood as involving a pre-reflective implicit awareness of its own occurrence. From a methodological point of view, the book advances an innovative approach to Buddhist philosophy of mind under the guise of phenomenological naturalism—which allows for cognitive awareness to be understood in causal terms without reducing the contents of awareness to non-cognitive elements—and moves beyond comparative approaches to philosophy by emphasizing the continuity of concerns between the discourses of Buddhist and Western philosophers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There have been several attempts of late to read Yoga ¯ca ¯ra through the lens of Western phenomenology.”
From Is Yogācāra Phenomenology? Some Evidence from the Cheng weishi lun (2016) · cites this paper as Coseru (2012)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is Yogācāra Phenomenology? Some Evidence from the Cheng weishi lun
Sharf, R. H. (2016) · Journal of Indian Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10781-015-9282-7 · Cited by 18
‘The view from above’: a theory of comparative philosophy
FRAZIER, J. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000362 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Coseru, C.
- Corresponding author
- Coseru, Christian
- ORCID
- Coseru, Christian
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-09-28
- OpenAlex
- W4238756134
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- perception, Buddhist epistemology, Dignāga, Dharmakirti, Śāntarakṣita, Kamalaśīla, Edmund Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, belief formation, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review