The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Does Culture Matter?
Abstract
This chapter reviews the literature regarding intercultural interactions, identifying two different perspectives on how culture matters in groups, and delineating boundary conditions in prior theories and research. As a means of pushing theory development in this domain, it is proposed that the concept of ‘Intercultural Interaction Spaces’ helps to address limitations of prior research, which rarely focuses on the context of intercultural interaction. The perspective presented in this chapter recognizes that many modern intercultural work interactions are not in formal meetings, but rather are horizontal, unstructured, temporary, and sporadic, and that they often occur in distributed teams enabled by technology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The effect of sociocultural diversity depends on other features of the team [272], such as how long members have interacted, the types of diversity investigated, and the types of outcomes under scrutiny [86].”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [272]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 · Cited by 633
Poverty and Aspirations Failure
Dalton, P. S., Ghosal, S., & Mani, A. (2014) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12210 · Cited by 440
Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091240 · Cited by 163
Self-citationTung, R. L., & Stahl, G. K. (2018) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-018-0184-2 · Cited by 150
(2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Gibson, C. B.
- Venue
- Culture and Group Processes
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-12-13
- Pages
- 166-194
- OpenAlex
- W2481898366
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 35.18
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Keywords
- intercultural interaction, virtual teams, theory development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
