Cited by 81Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyCultural Studies and PostmodernismHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Technologies of Enchantment?: Exploring Celtic Art: 400 BC to AD 100

Garrow, Duncan, Gosden, Chris·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199548064.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gosden, Garrow and colleagues have applied Gell's concept of technologies of enchantment to Celtic art, noting its capacity for drawing in and bewildering the viewer.

    “Gosden, Garrow and colleagues (Garrow and Gosden 2012; Gosden et al. 2008) have applied Gell’s concept of “technologies of enchantment” to Celtic art, noting its capacity for drawing in and bewildering the viewer.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrow, D., & Gosden, C.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2012-08-02
OpenAlex
W4248406219
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.83
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
enchantment, technology, magic, religion and technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review