Cited by 62Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

The impact of Bayesian chronologies on the British Iron Age

Open access
Hamilton, William Derek, Haselgrove, Colin, Gosden, Chris·2015·World Archaeology

Abstract

Radiocarbon dating was long neglected in Iron Age research, with dates on the ‘Hallstatt plateau’ (800–400 bc) considered too broad to be useful compared to artefact typo-chronologies. Such views are now untenable. Around fifty British Iron Age settlements and cemeteries have been dated using Bayesian methodologies, yielding two important general results: (1) typological dating produces sequences that are regularly too late; and (2) many phenomena, from chariot burials to settlement shifts, represent brief horizons, rather than being long lived. Drawing on a selection of studies, this article explores the impact of Bayesian modelling on British Iron Age studies. It highlights potential pitfalls and issues that must be considered when dating the period, illustrates some major successes and looks to the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438243.2015.1053976

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Hallstatt plateau (ca. 800-400 BC) has been problematic for resolving 14C dating chronologies during a critical period in European prehistorical technological developments without adequate stratigraphic control.

    “The Hallstatt plateau (ca. 800 -400 BC), one of the largest flatter regions in the calibration curve, has been problematic for resolving 14 C dating chronologies during a critical period in prehistorical technological developments in Europe and elsewhere without adequate stratigraphic control (Hamilton et al. 2015).”

    From The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP) (2020) · cites this paper as Hamilton et al. 2015

    “The case for avoidance” identifies the Hallstatt plateau at approximately 800–400 BC and explains how its flat calibration curve spreads the probability of radiocarbon dates, making Iron Age chronologies difficult to resolve. “Reinterpretation and the development of new site-based chronologies” says that phases on the plateau can be dated where adequate stratigraphic controls exist. The paper focuses on the British Iron Age; it does not establish the broader characterization of this interval as a critical period of technological development across Europe and elsewhere. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mattingly, D. 2007. An Imperial Possession: Britain in the Roman Empire. London: Penguin.
  2. Wheeler, R. E. M. 1954. The Stanwick Fortifications. Oxford: Society of Antiquaries of London Research Report 17.
  3. Chris Gosden is Professor of European Archaeology at the University of Oxford. His interests include archaeology, landscape and identity, history of the rainforest, Eurasian connections and Papua New Guinea. He is directing the 'English Landscape and Identities' project looking at the history of the English landscape from 1500 BC to AD 1088, which is funded by the European Research Council.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamilton, W. D., Haselgrove, C., & Gosden, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hamilton, William Derek
  • Haselgrove, Colin
  • Gosden, Chris
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
2015-06-09
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
642-660
ISSN
  • 0043-8243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1375
OpenAlex
W1616934657
Cited by
62
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • World Archaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Leicester
  • Arts and Humanities Research Board
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
British Iron Age, Hallstatt period, Bayesian chronology, radiocarbon dating, typological dating, chariot burials, cemeteries, Iron Age settlement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review