Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,649

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Treisman, Anne M., Geffen, Gina·2012·From Perception to Consciousness

Abstract

This paper reviews evidence from neuropsychological patient studies relevant to two questions concerning the functions of the medial temporal lobe in humans.The first is whether the hippocampus and the adjacent perirhinal cortex make different contributions to memory.Data are discussed from two patients with adult-onset bilateral hippocampal damage who show a sparing of item recognition relative to recall and certain types of associative recognition.It is argued that these data are consistent with Aggleton and Brown's (1999) proposal that familiarity-based recognition memory is not dependent on the hippocampus but is mediated by the perirhinal cortex and dorso-medial thalamic nucleus.The second question is whether the recognition memory deficit observed in medial temporal lobe amnesia can be explained by a deficit in perceptual processing and representation of objects rather than a deficit in memory per se.The finding that amnesics were impaired at recognizing, after short delays, patterns that they could successfully discriminate suggests that their memory impairment did not result from an objectprocessing deficit.The possibility remains, however, that the human perirhinal cortex plays a role in object processing, as well as in recognition memory, and data are presented that support this possibility.The medial temporal lobes are known to play a critical role in declarative memory (memory for facts and events) in humans, but it is currently unresolved whether the hippocampus and the adjacent medial temporal lobe cortices (entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices) make distinct contributions to memory, and, if so, what these contributions are.Furthermore, recent work with nonhuman primates has suggested that the role of the perirhinal cortex may not be exclusively one of memory.The current paper focuses primarily on two issues: first, whether recognition memory for individual items in humans is dependent on the integrity of the hippocampus or whether it can be mediated by adjacent cortical regions such as the perirhinal cortex; second, whether the object recognition memory deficit observed in amnesics with medial temporal lobe lesions can be explained by

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199734337.003.0007

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 1,649

Metadata

Authors
Treisman, A. M., & Geffen, G.
Venue
From Perception to Consciousness
Published
2012-05-24
Pages
40-50
OpenAlex
W2480627709
Cited by
1,649
References
52
FWCI
115.42
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199734337.003.0007
The paper
Treisman, A. M., & Geffen, G. (2012). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. From Perception to Consciousness. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aosobl/9780199734337.003.0007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.