Beef Production and Carcass Evaluation in Brazil
Open accessAbstract
Brazil plays a leading role in the world beef market, possessing one of the largest commercial beef herds and setting records in livestock-derived product export revenues. Brazil has no national carcass grading system. Slaughterhouses are responsible for their own metrics to address internal and export market demands. The current standard for carcass classification is based on dentition, gender, carcass weight, and subcutaneous/external fat scores. This paper aims to explore the main characteristics of beef cattle production and carcass evaluation in Brazil. Livestock production in Brazil continues to expand due to the adoption of new specialized technologies (Hötzel and Vandresen, 2022). In this context, Brazil is placed as the main producer of livestock-derived commodities, ranking among the top world producers and exporters of beef, pork, and poultry (USDA, 2023). This review provides an overview of beef production in Brazil, discusses the Brazilian beef sector statistics, the Brazilian system of carcass classification with examples of slaughterhouse beef carcass grading, Brazilians’ attitudes towards meat consumption, and finally recommendations for a new Brazilian beef carcass and grading system. Beef cattle in Brazil are raised mainly in a tropical climate environment with a wide range of soil conditions of different biomes (Amazon, Caatinga, Pantanal, Atlantic Forest, Pampa, and Cerrado regions). Some biomes such as Pampa and Pantanal provide native grasslands for grazing, providing an excellent environment for the preservation and sustainability of the biomes used for beef cattle production (Lobato et al., 2014). Beef production in Brazil is manifested in two different systems. The first cattle production system is characterized by minimal technological integration and human interference, consequently with very low productivity rates, as exemplified by heifers with poor body condition scores resulting in first breeding occurring at 36 months of age (Lobato et al., 2014). Conversely, the second system involves intensive livestock farming, which incorporates genetic improvement programs by selecting cows and their progenies for better performance, with intensive forage management, sanitary control, and modern management practices (Rosado Júnior and Lobato, 2010). Since Brazil predominantly produces leaner grass-fed beef carcasses, an increase in the number of younger animals on the market can improve the quality of Brazilian beef. The Brazilian beef cattle production cycle is getting shorter due to the optimization of land use and the adoption of technologies. As identified by Chiari et al., (2021), artificial insemination to improve genetic gain and uniformity in weaning weight, implementation of practices that improve pasture recovery and adoption of more productive forages to maximize pasture occupancy rates, use of feed supplementation, and adoption of good production practices in controlling diseases and parasites are some of the factors contributing to the increase in cattle productivity over the years. Malafaia et al., (2021) projected an increase in meat production per unit area, improvements in meat quality and sustainable systems, adoption of meat origin certifications, fabrication of more value-added meat cuts, and integration of technology to improve process transparency for stakeholders. These megatrends will ensure Brazil’s continued prominence as a major beef exporter by ensuring a robust Brazilian beef cattle supply chain through 2040. Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) is the main beef cattle breed produced in Brazil (Figure 1), which was introduced from India during the 19th century. The establishment of the Nellore breed in Brazil can be primarily attributed to its heat resistance, ability to thrive on poor-quality forages, and easy calving. Currently, more than 80% of Brazil’s beef cattle population comprises purebred or hybrids from the Nellore breed (Bonin et al., 2021). The adoption of crossbred animals, involving Bos indicus cows with European or composite breeds, has already become a reality within the Brazilian beef industry. A survey conducted by Silvestre and Millen, (2021) with 36 feedlot cattle nutritionists reported that 52% of their clients were feeding crossbred animals. Examples of Nellore cattle, carcass, and beef cuts in Brazil. (a) Nellore sires; (b) Nellore young bulls at slaughterhouse lairage; (c) Nellore carcasses after slaughter; (d-e) Nellore hot carcasses; (f) Nellore cold hindquarter; (g) Measuring rib-eye fat thickness; (h) Nellore beef rib; (i) Picanha/Culotte/Rump cap cut of Nellore carcass. (Photos by Sérgio Pflanzer). The animal protein production sector has faced many challenges during the pandemic. The global cessation in 2019 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and its extension into 2021 required the entire Brazilian meat production sector to undertake extensive work to reinforce sanitary controls and guarantee the quality and safety of the Brazilian meat to th
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Beef production exhibits a significant geographic concentration, primarily within North and South America, with Brazil and the United States standing out as major global players in both production and consumption.
“Beef production exhibits a significant geographic concentration, primarily within North and South America, with Brazil and the United States standing out as major global players in both production and consumption [77,78,79].”
From The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution (2026) · cites this paper as [79]
The Introduction describes Brazil as a top world beef producer and exporter, and Beef Market Statistics reports Brazilian beef consumption. The paper does not establish that beef production is concentrated in North and South America or that the United States is a major global player in both production and consumption; it mentions the United States only as a destination for Brazilian exports. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNellore is the main beef cattle breed produced in Brazil, and more than 80% of Brazil's beef cattle population comprises purebred or hybrid Nellore cattle.
“Nellore is the main beef cattle breed produced in Brazil, and more than 80% of Brazil’s beef cattle population comprises purebred or hybrid Nellore cattle [79].”
From The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution (2026) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Silvestre, A. M., & Millen, D. D. (2021) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.37496/rbz5020200189 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Brazilian beef produced on pastures: Sustainable and healthy
Lobato, J. F. P., de Freitas, A. K., Devincenzi, T., Cardoso, L. L., Tarouco, J. U., Vieira, R. M., Dillenburg, D. R., & Castro, I. (2014) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.022 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Hötzel, M. J., & Vandresen, B. (2022) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108893 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Meat Consumption in Sao Paulo – Brazil: Trend in the Last Decade
de Carvalho, A. M., César, C. L. G., Fisberg, R. M., & Marchioni, D. M. L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096667 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The Brazilian beef cattle supply chain in the next decades
Malafaia, G. C., Mores, G. D. V., Casagranda, Y. G., Barcellos, J. O. J., & Costa, F. P. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104704 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Gomes, M. D. N. B., Pedrosa, V. B., Silva, S. D. L. E., Bünger, L., Ross, D. W., Gomes, R. D. C., Santana, M. H. D. A., Cucco, D. D. C., de Rezende, F. M., Ítavo, L. C. V., et al. (2020) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108281 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Perception of beef quality for Spanish and Brazilian consumers
Boito, B., Lisbinski, E., Campo, M. M., et al. (2020) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108312 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Implementation of a performance indicators system in a beef cattle company
Júnior, A. G. R., & Lobato, J. F. P. (2010) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.1590/s1516-35982010000600029 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
de Andrade, T. S., Albertini, T. Z., Barioni, L. G., et al. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2019-0220 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Telhado, S. F. P. E., & Capdeville, G. (2021) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
PSXI-5 Best production practices for improvement of Beef Cattle carcass quality
Amaral, T. B., Fernandes, A., & Rosa, G. J. M. (2020) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skaa278.675
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution
Liu, Y., Dao, W., Gao, R., Fan, X., Yang, R., & Miao, Y. (2026) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani16050776 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nunes, C. L. D. C., Pflanzer, S. B., Rezende-de-Souza, J. H., & Chizzotti, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Nunes, Cris Luana de Castro
- ORCID
- Venue
- Animal Frontiers
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-04-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 15-20
- ISSN
- 2160-6056 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-6064
- PMC
- PMC11018704
- OpenAlex
- W4394858050
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Animal Frontiers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Keywords
- beef cattle production, carcass grading, beef exports, grass-fed beef, artificial insemination, genetic improvement, pasture recovery, beef cattle breeds, beef cattle nutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review