Cited by 88Physical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The effect of aquatic exercise on physical functioning in the older adult: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Open access
Waller, Benjamin, Ogonowska-Słodownik, Anna, Vitor, Manuel, Rodionova, Karina, Lambeck, Johan, Heinonen, Ari, Daly, Daniel·2016·Age and Ageing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ageing and sedentary behaviour cause negative changes in the neuromuscular systems of healthy older adults resulting in a decrease in physical functioning. Exercising in water (aquatic exercise, AE) has been shown to be effective at improving physical functioning in this population; however, no systematic review with meta-analysis has been published. PURPOSE: to investigate the effect of AE on physical functioning in healthy older adults compared to control or land-based exercise (LE) through a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, published before 31st December 2015. STUDY SELECTION: in total, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review; 24 studies with 1,456 subjects (89% female) and with mean age 66.4 years were included in the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: data were extracted and checked for accuracy by three independent reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: size of treatment effect was measured using the standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: compared to control interventions, AE had a moderate positive effect on physical functioning 0.70 [95% CI 0.48 to 0.92]. Compared to LE, AE had a small positive effect on physical functioning 0.39 [0.12 to 0.66]. LIMITATIONS: there is a high risk of bias and low methodological quality in the studies particularly when comparing AE to LE with possible over estimation of the benefit of AE. CONCLUSIONS: AE may improve physical functioning in healthy older people and is at least as effective as LE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afw102

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of 28 studies demonstrated a positive effect of aquatic exercises on physical functioning (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-0.92) compared with no training.

    “A meta-analysis of 28 studies demonstrated a positive effect of aquatic exercises on physical functioning (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48–0.92) compared with no training (control group)294.”

    From Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies (2018) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Abstract (p. 1) reports a positive effect of aquatic exercise versus control of 0.70 (95% CI 0.48–0.92), also reported in Results under “Aquatic exercise compared to control.” However, 28 studies were included in the systematic review, only 24 in the meta-analysis, and the effect measure was a standardised mean difference, not a risk ratio (RR). (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aquatic exercises are as effective as land-based exercises (SMD 0.39, 95% CI 0.12-0.66).

    “aquatic exercises are as effective as land-based exercises (standardized mean difference 0.39, 95% CI 0.12–0.66)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waller, B., Ogonowska-Słodownik, A., Vitor, M., Rodionova, K., Lambeck, J., Heinonen, A., & Daly, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw (PL)
  • Latvian Academy of Sport Education (LV)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Waller, Benjamin
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2016-07-04
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
594-602
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2464574497
Cited by
88
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Jyväskylän Yliopisto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
aquatic exercise, physical function, older adults, land-based exercise, aging, sedentary behavior, exercise intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Physical Fitness, Water, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review