Cited by 133Obesity, Physical Activity, DietCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Effects of a very-low-calorie diet and physical-training regimens on body composition and resting metabolic rate in obese females

Donnelly, JE, Pronk, NP, Jacobsen, DJ, Pronk, SJ, Jakicic, JM·1991·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Sixty-nine obese females received 90 d of a liquid diet providing 2184 kJ/d in clinical trials. Groups were diet only (C), diet plus endurance exercise (EE), diet plus weight training (WT), or diet plus endurance exercise and weight training (EEWT). Changes in body weight, percent fat, fat weight, and fat-free mass were not different between groups. Declines in resting metabolic rate (RMR) were approximately 7% to approximately 12% of baseline values with no differences among groups. A significant increase in work capacity (approximately 16%) was shown for EEWT. Strength index showed declines of approximately 6% for C and EE and gains of approximately 3% and approximately 10% for EEWT and WT, respectively. These clinical trials did not show advantages of any exercise regimen over diet alone for weight loss, body-composition changes, or declines in RMR. Improvements in work capacity were limited and strength improved in groups that participated in strength training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/54.1.56

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In response to a very-low-calorie diet that induced the loss of about 20% of baseline weight, the addition of structured exercise did not preserve lean mass significantly better than the very-low-calorie diet alone.

    “For example, in response to a very-low-calorie diet (VLCD), which induced the loss of ~ 20% of baseline weight (~ 20 kg), the addition of structured exercise (i.e., randomization to aerobic, resistance, or aerobic plus resistance groups) did not preserve lean mass significantly better than the VLCD alone [94].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnelly, J., Pronk, N., Jacobsen, D., Pronk, S., & Jakicic, J.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska at Kearney (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-07
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
56-61
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098786382
Cited by
133
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r15dk038899-01)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R15DK38899-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
very low calorie diet, obesity, obese women, resting metabolic rate, body composition, weight loss, endurance exercise, weight training, resistance training, work capacity, strength index, fat-free mass, liquid diet
MeSH terms
Basal Metabolism, Body Composition, Energy Intake, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Obesity, Oxygen Consumption, Weight Loss, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review