Cited by 300Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityNutritional Studies and Diet

Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices.

Open access
Reijnders, Lucas, Soret, Sam·2003·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Quantitative environmental evaluations of meat, fresh vegetables, and processed protein based on soybeans suggest that the environmental burden of vegetarian foods is usually relatively low when production and processing are considered. The environmental comparison of cheese varieties made from cow milk and directly from lupine and the evaluation of energy inputs in fish protein and vegetable protein also suggest an environmental advantage for vegetarian food. In the evaluation of processed protein food based on soybeans and meat protein, a variety of environmental impacts associated with primary production and processing are a factor 4.4-> 100 to the disadvantage of meat. The comparison of cheese varieties gives differences in specific environmental impacts ranging between a factor 5 and 21. And energy use for fish protein may be up to a factor 14 more than for protein of vegetable origin. Assessment suggests that on average the complete life cycle environmental impact of nonvegetarian meals may be roughly a factor 1.5-2 higher than the effect of vegetarian meals in which meat has been replaced by vegetable protein. Although on average vegetarian diets may well have an environmental advantage, exceptions may also occur. Long-distance air transport, deep-freezing, and some horticultural practices may lead to environmental burdens for vegetarian foods exceeding those for locally produced organic meat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.664s

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bleken M, Bakken LR. The nitrogen cost of food production: Nor- wegian society. Ambio 1997;26:134-39.
  2. Pal BP. Environmental conservation and agricultural production. Indian J Agric Sci 1984;54:233-50.
  3. Reijnders L. Environmental aspects of meat production and vegetar- ianism. In: Sabaté J, ed. Vegetarian nutrition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001:441-62.
  4. Black KD, ed. Sheffield biological sciences. Vol 5. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001.
  5. Ruttan VW. Sustainable agricultural growth. In: Ruttan VW, ed. Agri- culture, environment and health. Minneapolis: University of Min- nesota Press, 1994:3-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reijnders, L., & Soret, S.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Corresponding author
Reijnders, Lucas
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
664S-668S
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143257130
Cited by
300
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
dietary protein, environmental impact, vegetarian diet, meat production, soybean, fish protein, plant proteins, life cycle assessment, energy input, food processing, greenhouse gas emissions
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Dietary Proteins, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Diet, Vegetarian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review