Cited by 199Phytoestrogen effects and researchPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesNutritional Studies and Diet

Dietary phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk

Open access
Keinan-Boker, Lital, van Der Schouw, Yvonne T, Grobbee, Diederick E, Peeters, Petra HM·2004·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background A high intake of phytoestrogens, particularly isoflavones, has been suggested to decrease breast cancer risk. Results from human studies are inconclusive. Objective We investigated the association between phytoestrogen intake and breast cancer risk in a large prospective study in a Dutch population with a habitually low phytoestrogen intake. Design The study population consisted of 15 555 women aged 49-70 y who constituted a Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutriton (EPIC; 1993-1997). Data concerning habitual dietary intake in the preceding year were obtained by using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. The content of isoflavones and lignans in relevant food items was estimated through a literature search, the use of food-composition tables, and contact with experts. Newly diagnosed breast cancer cases up to 1 January 2001 were identified through linkage with the Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands. Hazard ratios for the disease were estimated by Cox proportional hazard analysis for quartiles of isoflavone and lignan intake. Associations were adjusted for known breast cancer risk factors and daily energy intake. Results A total of 280 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer during follow-up. The median daily intakes of isoflavones and lignans were 0.4 (interquartile range: 0.3-0.5) and 0.7 (0.5-0.8) mg/d, respectively. Relative to the respective lowest intake quartiles, the hazard ratios for the highest i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/79.2.282

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 11 prospective cohort studies reporting on risk of primary breast cancer, one (9%) showed soy isoflavone intake was associated with overall reduced risk, while the remaining studies showed no associations.

    “Of 11 studies reporting on risk of primary breast cancer, one (9%) showed that soy isoflavone intake was associated with overall reduced risk of breast cancer [116], while the remaining studies showed no associations [99,104,105,107-109,111,113-115,117].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keinan-Boker, L., van Der Schouw, Y. T., Grobbee, D. E., & Peeters, P. H.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
282-288
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116755301
Cited by
199
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
phytoestrogens, isoflavones, lignans, breast cancer risk, dietary intake, postmenopausal women, Western populations, EPIC cohort
MeSH terms
Aged, Anthropometry, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Postmenopause, Lignans, Plant Preparations, Phytoestrogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review