Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of dietary vitamin D requirements during pregnancy and lactation

Open access
Hollis, Bruce W, Wagner, Carol L·2004·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.717
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Concerns about vitamin D have resurfaced in medical and scientific literature because the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the United States, particularly among darkly pigmented persons, has increased. The primary goals of this review were to discuss past and current literature and to reassess the dietary reference intake for vitamin D in adults, with particular focus on women during pregnancy and lactation. The appropriate dose of vitamin D during pregnancy and lactation is unknown, although it appears to be greater than the current dietary reference intake of 200-400 IU/d (5-10 microg/d). Doses of < or =10 000 IU vitamin D/d (250 microg/d) for up to 5 mo do not elevate circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D to concentrations > 90 ng/mL, whereas doses < 1000 IU/d appear, in many cases, to be inadequate for maintaining normal circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of between 15 and 80 ng/mL. Vitamin D plays no etiologic role in cardiac valvular disease, such as that observed in Williams syndrome, and, as such, animal models involving vitamin D intoxication that show an effect on cardiac disease are flawed and offer no insight into normal human physiology. Higher doses of vitamin D are necessary for a large segment of Americans to achieve concentrations equivalent to those in persons who live and work in sun-rich environments. Further studies are necessary to determine optimal vitamin D intakes for pregnant and lactating women as a function of latitude and race.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.717

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Hollis, B. W., & Wagner, C. L.
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
717-726
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1093/ajcn/79.5.717
OpenAlex
W1856965838
Cited by
425
References
79
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of dietary vitamin D requirements during pregnancy and lactation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajcn/79.5.717
The paper
Hollis, B. W., & Wagner, C. L. (2004). Assessment of dietary vitamin D requirements during pregnancy and lactation. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/79.5.717

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.