Cited by 658Vitamin D Research StudiesBirth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and Medication Impact

Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and child outcomes

Open access
Gale, C R, Robinson, S M, Harvey, N C, Javaid, M K, Jiang, B, Martyn, C N, Godfrey, K M, Cooper, C +1 more·2008·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether exposure to high maternal concentrations of 25(OH)-vitamin D in pregnancy poses any risk to the child.Design Prospective study.Setting Princess Anne Maternity Hospital, Southampton, UK.Subjects A group of 596 pregnant women were recruited. A total of 466 (78%) children were examined at birth, 440 (74%) at age 9 months and 178 (30%) at age 9 years.Methods Maternal 25 (OH)-vitamin D concentrations were measured in late pregnancy. Anthropometry of the child was recorded at birth, 9 months and 9 years. At 9 months, atopic eczema was assessed. At 9 years, children had an echocardiogram and a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan, blood pressure, arterial compliance and carotid intima-media thickness were measured and intelligence and psychological function assessed.Results There were no associations between maternal 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations and the child's body size or measures of the child's intelligence, psychological health or cardiovascular system. Children whose mothers had a 25(OH)-vitamin D concentration in pregnancy >75 nmol/l had an increased risk of eczema on examination at 9 months (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.15-9.29, P=0.025) and asthma at age 9 years (OR 5.40, 95% CI, 1.09-26.65, P=0.038) compared to children whose mothers had a concentration of <30 nmol/l.Conclusion Exposure to maternal concentrations of 25(OH)-vitamin D in pregnancy in excess of 75 nmol/l does not appear to influence the child's intelligence, psychological health or cardiovascular system; there could be an increased risk of atopic disorders, but this needs confirmation in other studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602680

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gale et al. (2008) could not find any relationship between maternal 25(OH)D concentration during pregnancy and child's intelligence and psychological health at ages 9 months and 9 years.

    “By contrast, Gale et al. (2008) could not find any relationship between maternal 25(OH)D concentration during pregnancy and child’s intelligence and psychological health at ages 9 months and 9 years [104].”

    From Vitamin D and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Literature Review (2016) · cites this paper as [104]

  • At follow-up, the sample size was smaller (n = 178) and the attrition rate was higher (70%) in the Gale et al. study than in the Whitehouse et al. and Morales et al. studies (n = 412 and 50% and n = 1826 and 25%, respectively).

    “At the follow-up, the sample size was smaller (n = 178) and the attrition rate was higher (70%) in the Gale et al. study [104] than the Whitehouse et al. and Morales et al. studies (n = 412 and 50% and n = 1826 and 25%, respectively) [94,103].”

    From Vitamin D and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Literature Review (2016) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Alfaham M Woodhead S Pask G Davies D Vitamin D deficiency: a concern in pregnant Asian women Br J Nutr 1995a 73 881 887 7632669
  2. Goodenday LS Gordon GS No risk from vitamin D in pregnancy Ann.Intern.Med 1971a 75 807 808 5122174
  3. Holick MF Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease Am J Clin Nutr 2004b 80 1678S 1688S 15585788
  4. Meddeb N Sahli H Chahed M Abdelmoula J Feki M Salah H Frini S Kaabachi N Belkahia C Mbazaa R Zouari B Sellami S Vitamin D deficiency in Tunisia Osteoporos.Int 2005b 16 180 183 15197539
  5. Nesby-O'Dell S Scanlon KS Cogswell ME Gillespie C Hollis BW Looker AC Allen C Doughertly C Gunter EW Bowman BA Hypovitaminosis D prevalence and determinants among African American and white women of reproductive age: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 Am J Clin Nutr 2002b 76 187 192 12081833
  6. Poon AH Laprise C Lemire M Montpetit A Sinnett D Schurr E Hudson TJ Association of vitamin D receptor genetic variants with susceptibility to asthma and atopy Am J Respir.Crit Care Med 2004b 170 967 973 15282199
  7. Raby BA Lazarus R Silverman EK Lake S Lange C Wjst M Weiss ST Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with childhood and adult asthma Am J Respir.Crit Care Med 2004b 170 1057 1065 15282200
  8. Sachan A Gupta R Das V Agarwal A Awasthi PK Bhatia V High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women and their newborns in northern India Am J Clin Nutr 2005a 81 1060 1064 15883429
  9. Schroth RJ Lavelle CL Moffatt ME Review of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy: who is affected? Int J Circumpolar.Health 2005a 64 112 120 15945281

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gale, C. R., Robinson, S. M., Harvey, N. C., Javaid, M. K., Jiang, B., Martyn, C. N., Godfrey, K. M., Cooper, C., & the Princess Anne Hospital Study Group
Affiliations
Southampton General Hospital (GB)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2007-02-21
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
68-77
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2168383921
Cited by
658
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 50
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
maternal vitamin D status, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, pregnancy, child outcomes, atopic dermatitis, childhood asthma, child intelligence, child mental health, cardiovascular health, carotid intima-media thickness, arterial compliance, body size
MeSH terms
Asthma, Child, Child Development, Dermatitis, Atopic, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Nutritional Status, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Cohort Studies, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review