The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?
Open accessAbstract
Probiotics have been advocated for the prevention and treatment of a wide range of diseases, and there is strong evidence for their efficacy in some clinical scenarios. Probiotics are now widely used in many countries by consumers and in clinical practice. Given the increasingly widespread use of probiotics, a thorough understanding of their risks and benefits is imperative. In this article we review the safety of probiotics and discuss areas of uncertainty regarding their use. Although probiotics have an excellent overall safety record, they should be used with caution in certain patient groups-particularly neonates born prematurely or with immune deficiency. Because of the paucity of information regarding the mechanisms through which probiotics act, appropriate administrative regimens, and probiotic interactions, further investigation is needed in these areas. Finally, note that the properties of different probiotic species vary and can be strain-specific. Therefore, the effects of one probiotic strain should not be generalized to others without confirmation in separate studies. Careful consideration should be given to these issues before patients are advised to use probiotic supplements in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Immune compromise (including a debilitated state or malignancy) has been identified as a risk factor for rare cases of bacteraemia or fungaemia in patients taking certain probiotics (most commonly Saccharomyces boulardii).74,75”
From Systematic review: probiotics in the management of lower gastrointestinal symptoms in clinical practice - an evidence-based international guide (2013) · cites this paper as [75]
In the citing paper
“The general consensus is that probiotic ingestion is safe [221, 222], with large doses well tolerated and failing to exhibit any toxicity [223].”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics (2019) · cites this paper as [221]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Host-Bacterial Mutualism in the Human Intestine
Bäckhed, F., Ley, R. E., Sonnenburg, J. L., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104816 · Cited by 5,277
Recognition of Commensal Microflora by Toll-Like Receptors Is Required for Intestinal Homeostasis
Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Paglino, J., Eslami-Varzaneh, F., Edberg, S., & Medzhitov, R. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.002 · Cited by 4,251
Wegmann, T. G., Lin, H., Guilbert, L., & Mosmann, T. R. (1993) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/0167-5699(93)90235-d · Cited by 2,852
Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
Kalliomäki, M. A., Salminen, S., Arvilommi, H. S., Kero, P. O., Koskinen, P. J., & Isolauri, E. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04259-8 · Cited by 2,443
Molecular Analysis of Commensal Host-Microbial Relationships in the Intestine
Hooper, L. V., Wong, M. H., Thelin, A., Hansson, L., Falk, P. G., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.881 · Cited by 2,202
Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food
Who, F. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,843
Gionchetti, P., Rizzello, F., Venturi, A., Brigidi, P., Matteuzzi, D., Bazzocchi, G., Poggioli, G., Miglioli, M., & Campieri, M. (2000) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2000.9370 · Cited by 1,485
Zoetendal, E. G., Akkermans, A. D. L., & de Vos, W. M. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.10.3854-3859.1998 · Cited by 1,360
Kelly, D., Campbell, J. I., King, T. P., Grant, G., Jansson, E. Å., Coutts, A., Pettersson, S., & Conway, S. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1018 · Cited by 1,026
Probiotics: A novel approach in the management of food allergy
Majamaa, H., & Isolauri, E. (1997) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70093-9 · Cited by 929
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1996, Commission directive on processed cereal-based foods and baby foods for infants and young children. Luxemburg City, Luxembourg: European Commission,, L49, 17
- Lestin, 2003, Fungemia after oral treatment with Saccharomyces boulardii in a patient with multiple comorbidities, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 128, 2531
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics- a review
Pandey, K. R., Naik, S. R., & Vakil, B. V. (2015) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-015-1921-1 · Cited by 1,350
Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2010.02.017 · Cited by 1,302
Pyrosequencing study of fecal microflora of autistic and control children
Finegold, S. M., Dowd, S. E., Gontcharova, V., Liu, C., Henley, K. E., Wolcott, R. D., Youn, E., Summanen, P. H., Granpeesheh, D., Dixon, D., et al. (2010) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.06.008 · Cited by 977
Microorganisms with Claimed Probiotic Properties: An Overview of Recent Literature
Fijan, S. (2014) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph110504745 · Cited by 1,059
Safety assessment of probiotics for human use
Sanders, M. E., Akkermans, L. M. A., Haller, D., Hammerman, C., Heimbach, J. T., Hörmannsperger, G., & Huys, G. (2010) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127 · Cited by 816
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyle, R. J., Robins-Browne, R. M., & Tang, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Tang, Mimi LK
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1256-1264
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170210827
- Cited by
- 776
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- probiotics, probiotic safety, preterm infants, immunodeficiency, probiotic supplements
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bifidobacterium, Child, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Lactobacillus, Male, Middle Aged, Fungemia, Sepsis, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
