Effects of a modestly lower carbohydrate diet in gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Lower carbohydrate diets have the potential to improve glycemia but may increase ketonemia in women with gestational diabetes (GDM). We hypothesized that modestly lower carbohydrate intake would not increase ketonemia. Objective To compare blood ketone concentration, risk of ketonemia, and pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM randomly assigned to a lower carbohydrate diet or routine care. Methods Forty-six women aged (mean ± SEM) 33.3 ± 0.6 y and prepregnancy BMI 26.8 ± 0.9 kg/m2 were randomly assigned at 28.5 ± 0.4 wk to a modestly lower carbohydrate diet (MLC, ∼135 g/d carbohydrate) or routine care (RC, ∼200 g/d) for 6 wk. Blood ketones were ascertained by finger prick test strips and 3-d food diaries were collected at baseline and end of the intervention. Results There were no detectable differences in blood ketones between completers in the MLC group compared with the RC group (0.1 ± 0.0 compared with 0.1 ± 0.0 mmol/L, n = 33, P = 0.31, respectively), even though carbohydrate and total energy intake were significantly lower in the intervention group (carbohydrate 165 ± 7 compared with 190 ± 9 g, P = 0.04; energy 7040 ± 240 compared with 8230 ± 320 kJ, P <0.01, respectively). Only 20% of participants in the MLC group met the target intake compared with 65% in the RC group (P <0.01). There were no differences in birth weight, rate of large-for-gestational-age infants, percent fat mass, or fat-free mass between groups. Conclusions An intervention to reduce carbohydrate intake in GDM did not raise ketones to clinical significance, possibly because the target of 135 g/d was difficult to achieve in pregnancy. Feeding studies with food provision may be needed to assess the benefits and risks of low-carbohydrate diets. This trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12616000018415.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A modestly lower carbohydrate intake of 165 g/day (~38-39% of energy intake) at 28.5 ± 0.4 weeks in women with GDM did not significantly raise ketone levels compared to those treated with 190 g of carbohydrates per day.
“Mijatovic J et al. [74] observed that a modestly lower carbohydrate intake of 165 g/day (~38–39% of energy intake) at 28.5 ± 0.4 weeks in women with GDM did not significantly raise ketone levels compared to those treated with 190 g of carbohydrates per day.”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Later studies found no significant benefits in terms of insulin use, timing of insulin initiation, or pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM compared to normal carbohydrate intake.
“later studies found no significant benefits in terms of insulin use, timing of insulin initiation, or pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM compared to normal carbohydrate intake [74,75].”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Cites
Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707943 · Cited by 5,563 · see citing works
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
(2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002501 · Cited by 1,820 · see citing works
Ajala, O., English, P., & Pinkney, J. (2013) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.042457 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Correlations between Antepartum Maternal Metabolism and Intelligence of Offspring
Rizzo, T., Metzger, B. E., Burns, W. J., & Burns, K. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199109263251303 · Cited by 707 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One concern of low-carbohydrate diets in pregnancy is the potential to increase maternal ketone concentration because of a reported inverse association with the intelligence of the offspring, even in the absence of ketoacidosis (16).”
BackgroundDiabetes and Pregnancy: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Blumer, I., Hadar, E., Hadden, D. R., Jovanovič, L., Mestman, J. H., Murad, M. H., & Yogev, Y. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2465 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Chakraborty, H. (2009) · doi:10.3768/rtipress.2009.mr.0009.0903 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Hernandez, T. L., Van Pelt, R. E., Anderson, M. A., Reece, M. S., Reynolds, R. M., de la Houssaye, B. A., Heerwagen, M., Donahoo, W. T., Daniels, L. J., Chartier-Logan, C., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0515 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing: An Overview of the Current Knowledge
Erbach, M., Freckmann, G., Hinzmann, R., Kulzer, B., Ziegler, R., Heinemann, L., & Schnell, O. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816641433 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Low-Carbohydrate Diet for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Moreno-Castilla, C., Hernandez, M., Bergua, M., Alvarez, M. C., Arce, M. A., Rodriguez, K., Martinez-Alonso, M., Iglesias, M., Mateu, M., Santos, M. D., et al. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-2714 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kusinski, L. C., Jones, D., Atta, N., Turner, E., Smith, S., Oude Griep, L. M., Rennie, K., De Lucia Rolfe, E., Sharp, S. J., Farewell, V., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03356-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wong, M. M. H., Yuen-Man Chan, M., Ng, T. P., & Louie, J. C. Y. (2024) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102941 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationCheong, L., Law, L. S.-C., Tan, L. Y. L., Amal, A. A.-A., Khoo, C. M., & Eng, P. C. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17071210 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mijatovic, J., Louie, J. C. Y., Buso, M. E., Atkinson, F. S., Ross, G. P., Markovic, T. P., & Brand-Miller, J. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Brand-Miller, Jennie C
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 284-292
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3034194532
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Sydney
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, low-carbohydrate diet, ketonemia, carbohydrate intake, pregnancy outcomes, birth weight, large for gestational age
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Glycemic Index, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review