Cited by 97Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiet and metabolism studiesDiabetes Management and Research

Low-Carbohydrate Diet for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Moreno-Castilla, Cristina, Hernandez, Marta, Bergua, Merce, Alvarez, Maria C., Arce, Maria A., Rodriguez, Karen, Martinez-Alonso, Montserrat, Iglesias, Montserrat +8 more·2013·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical nutrition therapy based on the control of the amount and distribution of carbohydrates (CHO) is the initial treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but there is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing different dietary strategies. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a low-CHO diet for the treatment of GDM would lead to a lower rate of insulin treatment with similar pregnancy outcomes compared with a control diet. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 152 women with GDM were included in this open, randomized controlled trial and assigned to follow either a diet with low-CHO content (40% of the total diet energy content as CHO) or a control diet (55% of the total diet energy content as CHO). CHO intake was assessed by 3-day food records. The main pregnancy outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: The rate of women requiring insulin was not significantly different between the treatment groups (low CHO 54.7% vs. control 54.7%; P = 1). Daily food records confirmed a difference in the amount of CHO consumed between the groups (P = 0.0001). No differences were found in the obstetric and perinatal outcomes between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of women with GDM using a low-CHO diet did not reduce the number of women needing insulin and produced similar pregnancy outcomes. In GDM, CHO amount (40 vs. 55% of calories) did not influence insulin need or pregnancy outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc12-2714

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Later studies found no significant benefits in terms of insulin use, timing of insulin initiation, or pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM compared to normal carbohydrate intake.

    “later studies found no significant benefits in terms of insulin use, timing of insulin initiation, or pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM compared to normal carbohydrate intake [74,75].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]National Academy of Sciences, Ed. Dietary Reference Intakes: Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Aminoacids (macronutrients). Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreno-Castilla, C., Hernandez, M., Bergua, M., Alvarez, M. C., Arce, M. A., Rodriguez, K., Martinez-Alonso, M., Iglesias, M., Mateu, M., Santos, M. D., Pacheco, L. R., Blasco, Y., Martin, E., Balsells, N., Aranda, N., & Mauricio, D.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Lleida (ES)
  • Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova (ES)
  • Institut de Recerca Biomedica de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
  • Unitat de Salut Publica i Nutricio, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Reus, Spain
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2013-07-11
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
2233-2238
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2047479024
Cited by
97
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, low-carbohydrate diet, carbohydrate intake, insulin requirement, medical nutrition therapy, pregnancy outcomes, perinatal outcomes, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Insulin, Ketosis, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Diabetes, Gestational, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review