Cited by 319Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Lactation mastitis: occurrence and medical management among 946 breastfeeding women in the United States.

Foxman, B.·2002·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

In 1994-1998, the authors followed 946 breastfeeding women from Michigan and Nebraska for the first 3 months postpartum or until they stopped breastfeeding to describe mastitis incidence, mastitis treatment, and any associations between mastitis occurrence and hypothesized host characteristics and behaviors. Participants were interviewed by telephone at 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks postpartum or until they ceased breastfeeding. A total of 9.5% reported provider-diagnosed lactation mastitis at least once during the 12-week period, with 64% diagnosed via telephone. After adjustment in a logistic regression model, history of mastitis with a previous child (odds ratio (OR) = 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.64, 6.11), cracks and nipple sores in the same week as mastitis (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 2.04, 5.51), using an antifungal nipple cream (presumably for nipple thrush) in the same 3-week interval as mastitis (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.37, 8.54), and (for women with no prior mastitis history) using a manual breast pump (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.92, 5.62) strongly predicted mastitis. Feeding fewer than 10 times per day was protective regardless of whether or not feeding frequency in the same week or the week before mastitis was included in the model (for the same week: 7-9 times: OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.01; < or =6 times: OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.82). Duration of feeding was not associated with mastitis risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/155.2.103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postpartum mastitis occurs in as many as one third of breastfeeding women in the United States and leads to breast abscess formation in approximately 10% of cases.

    “Postpartum mastitis (PPM) occurs in as many as one third of breastfeeding women in the United States and leads to breast abscess formation in ≈10% of cases (1,2).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foxman, B.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Foxman, B.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2002-01-15
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
103-114
ISSN
0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112881392
Cited by
319
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd030866-04)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD30866)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Keywords
lactation mastitis, breastfeeding, mastitis incidence, risk factors, feeding frequency, postpartum women, mastitis treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Lactation Disorders, Mastitis, Michigan, Nebraska, Prospective Studies, Puerperal Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Incidence, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review