The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective Study of Diet and Pancreatic Cancer in Male Smokers
Abstract
There have been few prospective studies relating diet to pancreatic cancer, with most having fewer than 100 cases and only one examining dietary nutrients. The authors prospectively examined dietary factors hypothesized to be associated with exocrine pancreatic cancer in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study cohort in Finland. Of the 27,111 male smokers aged 50-69 years with complete dietary information, as ascertained from a self-administered dietary history questionnaire given at baseline (1985-1988), 163 developed pancreatic cancer from 1985 through November 1997. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate smoking- and age-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Energy-adjusted butter consumption and saturated fat intake were positively associated with pancreatic cancer (highest quintile vs. lowest: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87, 2.25 (p trend = 0.04), and HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.96, 2.64 (p trend = 0.02), respectively). Energy intake and energy-adjusted carbohydrate intake were inversely associated with the disease (highest quintile vs. lowest: HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.36, 1.07 (p trend = 0.05), and HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.37, 1.03 (p trend = 0.02), respectively). These results support the hypothesis that a high intake of saturated fat may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer in smokers, while greater intakes of energy and carbohydrate may reduce the risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.
WILLETT, W., & STAMPFER, M. J. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366 · Cited by 2,751
Leisure-Time Physical Activity, Body Size, and Colon Cancer in Women
Martinez, M. E., Giovannucci, E., Spiegelman, D., Willett, W. C., Hunter, D. J., & Colditz, G. A. (1997) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/89.13.948 · Cited by 419
Dietary treatment of the metabolic syndrome — the optimal diet
Riccardi, G., & Rivellese, A. A. (2000) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114500001082 · Cited by 265
Cited by
Diabetes and Pancreatic Cancer: Chicken or Egg?
Magruder, J. T., Elahi, D., & Andersen, D. K. (2011) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0b013e318209e05d · Cited by 140
Aune, D., Chan, D. S. M., Vieira, A. R., Navarro Rosenblatt, D. A., Vieira, R., Greenwood, D. C., Cade, J. E., Burley, V. J., & Norat, T. (2012) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds076 · Cited by 111
Huang, X., Gao, Y., Zhi, X., Ta, N., Jiang, H., & Zheng, J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep38936 · Cited by 56
Pancreatic Cancer and Exposure to Dietary Nitrate and Nitrite in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study
Aschebrook-Kilfoy, B., Cross, A. J., Stolzenberg-Solomon, R. Z., Schatzkin, A., Hollenbeck, A. R., Sinha, R., & Ward, M. H. (2011) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwr092 · Cited by 53
Self-citationGordon-Dseagu, V. L. Z., Thompson, F. E., Subar, A. F., Ruder, E. H., Thiébaut, A. C. M., Potischman, N., & Stolzenberg-Solomon, R. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwx036 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stolzenberg-Solomon, R. Z.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 783-792
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160329810
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.