The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lung Function and Glucose Metabolism: An Analysis of Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Abstract
Although people with diabetes have decreased lung function, the dose-response relation between measures of glucose control and lung function in nondiabetic people is not known. The authors used data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994) to investigate the relation between glucose tolerance test response and other measures of glucose homeostasis and lung function in an adult population without a clinical diagnosis of diabetes. Plasma glucose level 2 hours after oral administration of 75 g of glucose was inversely related to forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), with a difference of -144.7 ml (95% confidence interval: -231.9, -57.4) for persons in the highest quintile of postchallenge glucose compared with the lowest. Similar inverse associations with FEV(1) were found for other measures of glucose autoregulation. Lung function did not appear to be related to fasting glucose level. Similar associations were seen for forced vital capacity (FVC) but not for the FEV(1):FVC ratio. In the total study population, persons with previously diagnosed diabetes had an FEV(1) 119.1 ml (95% confidence interval: -161.5, -76.6) lower than persons without diabetes. This effect was greater in those with poorly controlled diabetes. These findings suggest that impaired glucose autoregulation is associated with impaired lung function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications
Brownlee, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414813a · Cited by 9,107
How good a marker is insulin level for insulin resistance?
Laakso, M. (1993) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116768 · Cited by 726
Cited by
Ehrlich, S. F., Quesenberry, C. P., Van Den Eeden, S. K., Shan, J., & Ferrara, A. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-0880 · Cited by 355
Update on Bispectral Index monitoring
Johansen, J. W. (2006) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2005.08.004 · Cited by 313
Innes, K. E., & Vincent, H. K. (2007) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1093/ecam/nel103 · Cited by 268
Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study of Lung Function in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Yeh, H.-C., Punjabi, N. M., Wang, N.-Y., Pankow, J. S., Duncan, B. B., Cox, C. E., Selvin, E., & Brancati, F. L. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-1464 · Cited by 257
Yoga for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
Innes, K. E., & Selfe, T. K. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/2016/6979370 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- McKeever, T. M., Weston, P. J., Hubbard, R., & Fogarty, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-03-03
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 546-556
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2151388121
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung Function and Glucose Metabolism: An Analysis of Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwi076
- The paper
- McKeever, T. M., Weston, P. J., Hubbard, R., & Fogarty, A. (2005). Lung Function and Glucose Metabolism: An Analysis of Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.