Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study of Lung Function in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Yeh, Hsin-Chieh, Punjabi, Naresh M., Wang, Nae-Yuh, Pankow, James S., Duncan, Bruce B., Cox, Christopher E., Selvin, Elizabeth, Brancati, Frederick L.·2008·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that diabetes is independently associated with reduced lung function, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We conducted cross-sectional and prospective analyses of diabetes status and lung function decline using baseline and 3-year follow-up data on 1,100 diabetic and 10,162 nondiabetic middle-aged adults from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were measured at baseline and at the 3-year follow-up using standard spirometry. RESULTS—At baseline, adults with diabetes had significantly lower predicted FVC (96 vs. 103%, P < 0.001) and predicted FEV1 (92 vs. 96%, P < 0.001) than those without diabetes. These differences remained significant after adjustment for demographic characteristics, adiposity, smoking, physical activity index, education, and ARIC field center. Graded, inverse associations were observed between hyperglycemia, diabetes severity (i.e., duration of diabetes and types of antidiabetes medications), and FVC and FEV1 (all Ptrend < 0.001). In prospective analyses, FVC declined faster in diabetic adults than in their nondiabetic counterparts (64 vs. 58 ml/year, P = 0.01). Diabetes severity as indicated by intensity of antidiabetic treatment also showed graded relationships with the rate of FVC decline (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS—These data support the notion that the lung is a target organ for diabetic injury. Additional research is required to identify pathophysiologic mechanisms and to determine clinical significance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc07-1464

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Yeh, H.-C., Punjabi, N. M., Wang, N.-Y., Pankow, J. S., Duncan, B. B., Cox, C. E., Selvin, E., & Brancati, F. L.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
741-746
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2149951188
Cited by
257
References
24
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study of Lung Function in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc07-1464
The paper
Yeh, H.-C., Punjabi, N. M., Wang, N.-Y., Pankow, J. S., Duncan, B. B., Cox, C. E., Selvin, E., & Brancati, F. L. (2008). Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study of Lung Function in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-1464

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.