Cited by 139Sperm and Testicular FunctionPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Is prenatal exposure to tobacco smoking a cause of poor semen quality? A follow-up study

Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Thulstrup, A. M., Storgaard, L., Toft, G., Olsen, J., Bonde, J. P.·2007·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

A few studies indicate that exposure to maternal smoking during fetal life decreases semen quality in adult life, but the results are inconsistent and retrospectively collected smoking data were used in most studies. From a Danish pregnancy cohort established in 1984-1987, 347 of 5,109 sons were selected according to their exposure to tobacco smoke in fetal life. From February 2005 to January 2006, a semen sample from the 347 men was analyzed for conventional semen characteristics according to standardized criteria by using a mobile laboratory. The authors found an inverse association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and total sperm count (p = 0.002). Men exposed to more than 19 cigarettes daily during pregnancy had approximately 19% lower semen volume (p = 0.04), 38% lower total sperm count (p = 0.11), and 17% lower sperm concentration (p = 0.47) compared with unexposed men. The odds ratio for oligospermia was 2.16 (95% confidence interval: 0.68, 6.87) among exposed men compared with the unexposed. No associations were found for sperm motility or morphology. These results indicate that prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke may have an adverse effect on semen quality and, if these associations are causal, they could explain some of the reported differences between populations and secular changes in semen quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwm032

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Thulstrup, A. M., Storgaard, L., Toft, G., Olsen, J., & Bonde, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2007-03-10
Volume
165
Issue
12
Pages
1372-1379
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2166210403
Cited by
139
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
  • Augustinus Fonden
  • Knud Højgaards Fond
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
prenatal tobacco exposure, smoking during pregnancy, semen quality, total sperm count, semen volume, sperm concentration, oligozoospermia, sperm motility, sperm morphology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Denmark, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, Semen, Smoking, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Testis, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review