Cited by 91Peripheral Neuropathies and DisordersInfluenza Virus Research StudiesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Risk of confirmed Guillain-Barre syndrome following receipt of monovalent inactivated influenza A (H1N1) and seasonal influenza vaccines in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project, 2009-2010.

Open access
Greene, S. K., Rett, M., Weintraub, E. S., Li, L., Yin, R., Amato, A. A., Ho, D. T., Sheikh, S. I. +9 more·2012·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

An increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following administration of the 1976 swine influenza vaccine led to a heightened focus on GBS when monovalent vaccines against a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus of swine origin were introduced in 2009. GBS cases following receipt of monovalent inactivated (MIV) and seasonal trivalent inactivated (TIV) influenza vaccines in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project in 2009-2010 were identified in electronic data and confirmed by medical record review. Within 1-42 days following vaccination, 9 cases were confirmed in MIV recipients (1.48 million doses), and 8 cases were confirmed in TIV-only recipients who did not also receive MIV during 2009-2010 (1.72 million doses). Five cases following MIV and 1 case following TIV-only had an antecedent respiratory infection, a known GBS risk factor; furthermore, unlike TIV, MIV administration was concurrent with heightened influenza activity. In a self-controlled risk interval analysis comparing GBS onset within 1-42 days following MIV with GBS onset 43-127 days following MIV, the risk difference was 5.0 cases per million doses (95% confidence interval: 0.5, 9.5). No statistically significant increased GBS risk was found within 1-42 days following TIV-only vaccination versus 43-84 days following vaccination (risk difference = 1.1 cases per million doses, 95% confidence interval: -3.1, 5.4). Further evaluation to assess GBS risk following both vaccination and respiratory infection is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kws195

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Vaccine Safety Datalink team found an association between risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome and the monovalent inactivated vaccine against H1N1 but not the trivalent inactivated vaccine.

    “The Vaccine Safety Datalink team, in a self-controlled risk interval analysis of data from the 2009–2010 influenza season found an association between risk of GBS and the monovalent inactivated vaccine (MIV) against H1N1 but not in association with the trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) (Greene et al., 2012).”

    From Vaccine Safety: Myths and Misinformation (2020) · cites this paper as Greene et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Stratton K, Alamario DA, Wizemann T, et al., editors. Immunization Safety Review: Influenza Vaccine and Neurological Complications. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [24]Fiore AE, Shay DK, Broder K, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009;58(RR-8):1–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene, S. K., Rett, M., Weintraub, E. S., Li, L., Yin, R., Amato, A. A., Ho, D. T., Sheikh, S. I., Fireman, B. H., Daley, M. F., Belongia, E. A., Jacobsen, S. J., Baxter, R., Lieu, T. A., Kulldorff, M., Vellozzi, C., & Lee, G. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Greene, S. K.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
175
Issue
11
Pages
1100-1109
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2166891339
Cited by
91
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (200-2002-00732)
  • Sanofi Pasteur
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
Guillain-Barré syndrome, influenza vaccine safety, vaccine adverse events, 2009 H1N1 pandemic, swine influenza, respiratory infections
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Middle Aged, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Seasons, Time Factors, United States, Vaccines, Inactivated, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk Assessment, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review