The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients
Open accessAbstract
It is common to present multiple adjusted effect estimates from a single model in a single table. For example, a table might show odds ratios for one or more exposures and also for several confounders from a single logistic regression. This can lead to mistaken interpretations of these estimates. We use causal diagrams to display the sources of the problems. Presentation of exposure and confounder effect estimates from a single model may lead to several interpretative difficulties, inviting confusion of direct-effect estimates with total-effect estimates for covariates in the model. These effect estimates may also be confounded even though the effect estimate for the main exposure is not confounded. Interpretation of these effect estimates is further complicated by heterogeneity (variation, modification) of the exposure effect measure across covariate levels. We offer suggestions to limit potential misunderstandings when multiple effect estimates are presented, including precise distinction between total and direct effect measures from a single model, and use of multiple models tailored to yield total-effect estimates for covariates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“After controlling for gender and age as potential confounding factors, independent associations between the outcome variables of burnout as well as anxiety/depression and the explanatory variables (i.e., ALTs, psychological flexibility) were examined [58].”
From The mediating role of psychological flexibility in the association of autistic-like traits with burnout and depression in medical students during clinical clerkships in Japan: a university-based cross-sectional study (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author)
Breiman, L. (2001) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009213726 · Cited by 4,340
Air Pollution and Hospital Admissions for Heart Disease in Eight U.S. Counties
Schwartz, J. D. (1999) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199901000-00005 · Cited by 3,045
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355 · cited 1×
“Model 1 then remains valid for obtaining an unbiased estimate of the total effect of HIV on the log odds of stroke; that is, under model 1, β1 retains its interpretation as the total effect of HIV, as it did under Figure 1, because smoking and age satisfy the back-door criterion for sufficiency for confounding control…”
BackgroundIdentifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects
Robins, J. M., & Greenland, S. (1992) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199203000-00013 · Cited by 1,793
Self-citationHernan, M. A. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.176 · Cited by 1,445
Statistical modeling: The two cultures
Breiman, L. (2001) · Cited by 1,314
Dose-Response and Trend Analysis in Epidemiology
Greenland, S. (1995) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199507000-00005 · Cited by 1,086
Self-citationConfounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference
Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009211805 · Cited by 933 · cited 3×
“represent changes in the log odds of the outcome) and we assume the outcome is uncommon at all covariate levels to avoid complications arising from noncollapsibility of odds ratios (9, 10).”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantifying Biases in Causal Models: Classical Confounding vs Collider-Stratification Bias
Greenland, S. (2003) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000042804.12056.6c · Cited by 810
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tennant, P. W. G., Murray, E. J., Arnold, K. F., Berrie, L., Fox, M. P., Gadd, S. C., Harrison, W. J., Keeble, C. M., Ranker, L. R., Textor, J. C., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyaa213 · Cited by 1,065
“This is exemplified by the ‘Table 2 fallacy’, which occurs when the coefficients for two or more ‘risk factors’ in a multivariable regression model are (mistakenly) interpreted as estimates for meaningful causal effects.(8) Causal inference approaches, such as the potential outcomes framework, promote greater transpar…”
BackgroundLederer, D. J., Bell, S. C., Branson, R. D., Chalmers, J. D., Marshall, R., Maslove, D. M., Ost, D. E., Punjabi, N. M., Schatz, M., Smyth, A. R., et al. (2019) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201808-564ps · Cited by 715
The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data
Hernán, M. Á. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304337 · Cited by 570
Ssentongo, P., Ssentongo, A. E., Heilbrunn, E. S., Ba, D. M., & Chinchilli, V. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238215 · Cited by 557
“[51] From a causal inference perspective, this is a significant source of bias and could affect the interpretation of the results in causal terms.”
Backgroundperformance: Assessment of Regression Models Performance
Lüdecke, D., Makowski, D., Ben‐Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., Wiernik, B. M., & Thériault, R. (2019) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.performance · Cited by 512
Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide
Efthimiou, O., Seo, M., Chalkou, K., Debray, T., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078276 · Cited by 544
“Regardless of the method we choose to assess predictor importance, we should be careful in our interpretations; associations seen in data might not reflect causal relationships (eg, see the “Table 2 fallacy” 111 ).”
Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare
Prosperi, M., Guo, Y., Sperrin, M., Koopman, J. S., Min, J. S., He, X., Rich, S., Wang, M., Buchan, I. E., & Bian, J. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y · Cited by 459
Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs
Digitale, J. C., Martin, J. N., & Glymour, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.001 · Cited by 408
“However, DAGs expose the hazards of indiscriminate adjustment [ 8 ].”
BackgroundWhat Is Your Estimand? Defining the Target Quantity Connects Statistical Evidence to Theory
Lundberg, I., Johnson, R., & Stewart, B. (2021) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224211004187 · Cited by 422
“A lack of clarity can lead to a table of regression coefficients that are, at best, weakly informative about theory (Keele, Stevenson, and Elwert 2020; Westreich and Greenland 2013).”
BackgroundYang, T., Wang, J., Huang, J., Kelly, F. J., & Li, G. (2023) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.4812 · Cited by 297
Statistical Foundations for Model-Based Adjustments
Greenland, S., & Pearce, N. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122559 · Cited by 274
Self-citationHumidity’s Role in Heat-Related Health Outcomes: A Heated Debate
Baldwin, J. W., Benmarhnia, T., Ebi, K. L., Jay, O., Lutsko, N. J., & Vanos, J. (2023) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp11807 · Cited by 275
“74,75 A fi rst challenge is that by conditioning (i.e., adjusting) on humidity levels, we deliberately remove the in fl uence of humidity on both temperature and the health outcome.”
A Framework for Descriptive Epidemiology
Lesko, C. R., Fox, M. P., & Edwards, J. K. (2022) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwac115 · Cited by 261
Rafi, Z., & Greenland, S. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01105-9 · Cited by 243
“Unconditionally, these S-values are measuring information against different test models: a model with no effect of radiotherapy but allowing an effect of chemotherapy, and a model allowing an effect of radiotherapy but no effect of chemotherapy; all other assumptions are the same in both models (including possibly uns…”
Self-citationStatistical Control Requires Causal Justification
Wysocki, A. C., Lawson, K. M., & Rhemtulla, M. (2022) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459221095823 · Cited by 275
“…relates the outcome to the predictor and the coefficients that relate the outcome to the controls cannot generally be interpreted in the same way because control → outcome coefficients represent direct (rather than total) effects and may themselves be confounded13 (Westreich & Greenland, 2013).”
BackgroundStructural correlates of pain in joints with osteoarthritis
Hunter, D. J., Guermazi, A., Roemer, F. W., Zhang, Y., & Neogi, T. (2013) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.017 · Cited by 215
Whittaker, J. L., Losciale, J. M., Juhl, C. B., Thorlund, J. B., Lundberg, M., Truong, L. K., Miciak, M., van Meer, B. L., Culvenor, A. G., Crossley, K. M., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2022-105496 · Cited by 200
Ferguson, K., McCann, M., Katikireddi, S. V., Thomson, H., Green, M. J., Smıth, D. J., & Lewsey, J. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz150 · Cited by 198
“29 4 Integration 1—synthesis Synthesis integrates each directed edge from the directed edge index rather than combining the DAGs themselves.”
Clift, A. K., Ende, A. V., Tan, P. S., Sallis, H., Lindson, N., Coupland, C. A. C., Munafo, M. R., Aveyard, P. N., Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Hopewell, J. C. (2021) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217080 · Cited by 193
“35 Notably, a harmful effect of smoking was seen on adjustment for age and sex in one of these studies.”
Mohamed, M., Ramsdale, E. E., Loh, K. P., Arastu, A., Xu, H., Obrecht, S., Castillo, D. A., Sharma, M., Holmes, H. M., Nightingale, G., et al. (2019) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0406 · Cited by 180
Gazeau, N., Liang, E. C., Wu, Q. V., Voutsinas, J. M., Barba, P., Iacoboni, G., Kwon, M., Ortega, J. L. R., López‐Corral, L., Hernani, R., et al. (2023) · Transplantation and Cellular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.001 · Cited by 185
Gill, D., Efstathiadou, A., Cawood, K., Tzoulaki, I., & Dehghan, A. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz200 · Cited by 151
On the Need to Revitalize Descriptive Epidemiology
Fox, M. P., Murray, E. J., Lesko, C. R., & Sealy-Jefferson, S. M. (2022) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwac056 · Cited by 155
Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID
Woodrow, M., Carey, C., Ziauddeen, N., Thomas, R., Akrami, A., Lutje, V., Greenwood, D. C., & Alwan, N. A. (2023) · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad233 · Cited by 162
“Similarly, our exploration of potential sources of heterogeneity may be prone to table 2 fallacy in the original studies, where these sub - groups do not derive from the focal research question, so these should be interpreted descriptively rather than causally [149].”
de Jong, V. M. T., Wang, Y., ter Hoeve, N. D., Opdam, M., Stathonikos, N., Jóźwiak, K., Hauptmann, M., Cornelissen, S., Vreuls, W., Rosenberg, E. H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01536 · Cited by 151
“sTILs, median % (IQR) 20 (5-70) NA NA NA T stage, No.”
BackgroundIsmail, N. A., Omar, S. V., Moultrie, H., Bhyat, Z., Conradie, F., Enwerem, M., Ferreira, H., Hughes, J. A., Joseph, L., Kock, Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00470-9 · Cited by 119
On the Nuisance of Control Variables in Causal Regression Analysis
Hünermund, P., & Louw, B. (2023) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/10944281231219274 · Cited by 224
“Our recommendations are in line with Westreich & Greenland (2013) who discuss a similar problem with respect to the interpretation of potentially endogenous controls in epidemiology.”
HIV and COVID-19: Intersecting Epidemics With Many Unknowns
Lesko, C. R., & Bengtson, A. M. (2020) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa158 · Cited by 133
“Ambiguity about the meaning of the term “independent risk factor” makes it highly likely that results will be misinterpreted and misapplied (20, 21).”
BackgroundBushnell, G., Stürmer, T., Gaynes, B. N., Pate, V., & Miller, M. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1273 · Cited by 114
Fagni, F., Simón, D., Taşçılar, K., Schönau, V., Sticherling, M., Neurath, M. F., & Schett, G. A. (2021) · The Lancet Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00247-2 · Cited by 109
Selection bias in rheumatic disease research
Choi, H. K., Nguyen, U., Niu, J., Danaei, G., & Zhang, Y. (2014) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.36 · Cited by 103
de Jong, V. M. T., Wang, Y., ter Hoeve, N. D., Opdam, M., Stathonikos, N., Jóźwiak, K., Hauptmann, M., Cornelissen, S., Vreuls, W., Rosenberg, E. H., et al. (2022) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-217984 · Cited by 100
Clarifying questions about “risk factors”: predictors versus explanation
Schooling, C. M., & Jones, H. E. (2018) · Emerging Themes in Epidemiology · doi:10.1186/s12982-018-0080-z · Cited by 102
Health‐related quality of life outcomes among breast cancer survivors
Park, J., Rodriguez, J. L., O’Brien, K. M., Nichols, H. B., Hodgson, M. E., Weinberg, C. R., & Sandler, D. P. (2020) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.33348 · Cited by 92
“Multivariate models were fitted after adjustments for different covariate subsets tailored to yield total effect estimates for covariates.(35) To evaluate associations between HRQOL scores after diagnosis and all-cause mortality, we used Cox proportional hazards regression and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and”
MethodMiscarriage Among Flight Attendants
Grajewski, B. A., Whelan, E. A., Lawson, C. C., Hein, M. J., Waters, M. A., Anderson, J. L., MacDonald, L. A., Mertens, C. J., Tseng, C., Cassinelli, R. T., et al. (2015) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000225 · Cited by 92
“any use of very hot baths or hot tubs/sauna in pregnancy 199 (24) 38 (32)”
Determinants of Breast Cancer Treatment Delay Differ for African American and White Women
McGee, S., Durham, D. D., Tse, C., & Millikan, R. C. (2013) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1432 · Cited by 92
“Separate models were developed for each exposure (race and characteristics of delay identified in bivariate analyses) to account for the different sets of explanatory variables necessary to control for confounding (36, 37).”
MethodCheetham, N. J., Penfold, R., Giunchiglia, V., Bowyer, V., Sudre, C. H., Canas, L. S., Deng, J., Murray, B. A. K., Kerfoot, E., Antonelli, M., et al. (2023) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102086 · Cited by 95
Piccoli, L., Ferrari, P., Piumatti, G., Jovic, S., Rodriguez, B. M. F., Mele, F., Giacchetto-Sasselli, I., Terrot, T., Silacci-Fregni, C., Cameroni, E., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100013 · Cited by 88
“7%) [18,19], while other studies in 2004 HCWs at an integrated care organization in London, UK [9], and in 2590 HCWs at a teaching hospital in Madrid, Spain [16] reported much higher seroprevalences (up to 31.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPrecise Answers to Vague Questions: Issues With Interactions
Rohrer, J. M., & Arslan, R. C. (2021) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459211007368 · Cited by 90
“There is no simple interpretation for these coefficients—giving a substantive interpretation to the coefficients of confounders and modifiers in multiple regression analyses constitutes an instance of the socalled Table 2 fallacy (Westreich & Greenland, 2013).”
BackgroundGreenland, S. (2020) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/ppe.12711 · Cited by 83
Self-citationMagnusson, K., Hagen, K. B., Østerås, N., Nordsletten, L., Natvig, B., & Haugen, I. K. (2014) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22460 · Cited by 81
“This is common with standard approaches, which may give biased results (16,17).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTrajectories of functional decline in knee osteoarthritis: the Osteoarthritis Initiative
White, D. K., Neogi, T., Nguyen, U., Niu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kev419 · Cited by 80
Arnold, K. F., Davies, V., de Kamps, M., Tennant, P. W. G., Mbotwa, J., & Gilthorpe, M. S. (2020) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyaa049 · Cited by 81
“28”
How to use directed acyclic graphs: guide for clinical researchers
Feeney, T., Hartwig, F. P., & Davies, N. M. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078226 · Cited by 79
“27 For example, in figure 4, heavy alcohol use not only affects mortality but also affects fast food consumption, which in turn affects mortality.”
Cole, S. R., Lau, B., Eron, J. J., Brookhart, M. A., Kitahata, M. M., Martin, J. N., Mathews, W. C., Mugavero, M. J., Cole, S. R., Brookhart, M. A., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwu122 · Cited by 78
Sweegers, M. G., Boyle, T., Vallance, J. K., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Brug, J., Aaronson, N. K., D’Silva, A., Kampshoff, C. S., Lynch, B. M., Nollet, F., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-019-0820-7 · Cited by 75
Hay, K. E., Barnes, T. S., Morton, J. M., Clements, A., & Mahony, T. J. (2014) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.001 · Cited by 76
Spinelli, M. A., Scott, H. M., Vittinghoff, E., Liu, A., Gonzalez, R., Morehead-Gee, A., Gandhi, M., & Buchbinder, S. (2019) · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz101 · Cited by 73
“To estimate overall—as opposed to direct—covariate effects on each measure of PrEP discontinuation [22], we used directed acyclic graphs to select models including all measured confounders of the relationship of each covariate with PrEP discontinuation, based on the prior PrEP retention literature [1, 3, 9, 23], while…”
MethodImputation approaches for potential outcomes in causal inference
Westreich, D., Edwards, J. K., Cole, S. R., Platt, R. W., Mumford, S. L., & Schisterman, E. F. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv135 · Cited by 64
“The use of such techniques—though more technically complex than regression approaches even in pointexposure settings—often results in the concentration on a single causal model for a single causal effect of interest, and thus may help avoid problems such as the misinterpretation of the regression coefficients for cova…”
BackgroundSelf-citationLo, A. X., Rundle, A., Buys, D. R., Kennedy, R., Sawyer, P., Allman, R. M., & Brown, C. J. (2016) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.14353 · Cited by 71
“001 7–11 47 (20) 74 (31) 67 (31) 84 (35) 12 62 (26) 61 (25) 46 (21) 53 (22) >12 111 (46) 61 (25) 36 (17) 47 (19) Below 2000 poverty guideline threshold, n (%) 34 (14) 77 (32) 110 (51) 102 (42) <.”
Schmidt, M., Hajage, D., Landoll, M., Péquignot, B., Langouet, E., Amalric, M., Dessap, A. M., Chiscano‐Camón, L., Surman, K., Finnerty, D., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00438-6 · Cited by 69
Sandberg, S., Asplund, D., Bisgaard, T., Bock, D., González, E., Karlsson, L., Matthiessen, P., Ohlsson, B., Park, J., Rosenberg, J., et al. (2020) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.15095 · Cited by 69
Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences
Arah, O. A. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021644 · Cited by 71
Bartram, D. (2021) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02586-3 · Cited by 74
Glucocorticoid use is associated with an increased risk of hypertension
Costello, R. E., Yimer, B. B., Roads, P., Jani, M., & Dixon, W. G. (2021) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa209 · Cited by 64
Rubio‐Rivas, M., Corbella, X., Mora‐Luján, J. M., Loureiro-Amigo, J., Sampalo, A. L., Bergua, C. Y., Atiénzar, P. J. E., Díez García, F., Ferrer, R. G., Canteli, S. P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9113488 · Cited by 67
“To avoid the so-called “Table 2 fallacy” we also made the multivariate model including all variables of the univariate model regardless of their significance [13].”
MethodMitjavila, M., Jiménez-Fonseca, P., Belló, P., Pubul, V., Percovich, J. C., García-Burillo, A., Hernando, J., Arbizu, J., Rodeño, E., Estorch, M., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-023-06166-8 · Cited by 52
“The model was designed to assess the effect of tumor subtype while controlling for various confounding variables, so coefficients associated with confounders should not be interpreted as implying causality [25].”
Shiwaku, H., Sato, H., Shimamura, Y., Abe, H., Shiota, J., Sato, C., Ominami, M., Sakae, H., Hata, Y., Fukuda, H., et al. (2022) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/a-1753-9801 · Cited by 63
Factors associated with time to independent walking recovery post-stroke
Kennedy, C., Bernhardt, J. A., Churilov, L. P., Collier, J. M., Ellery, F., Rethnam, V., Carvalho, L. B., Donnan, G. A., & Hayward, K. S. (2021) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-325125 · Cited by 62
Democratic values, education, and political trust
Kołczyńska, M. (2020) · International Journal of Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1177/0020715220909881 · Cited by 61
“Before moving forward, I will briefly discuss results for the remaining variables, noting that coefficients for adjustment variables should be interpreted with caution (Keele et al., 2020; Westreich and Greenland, 2013).”
BackgroundHowarth, E., Bower, P., Kontopantelis, E., Soiland‐Reyes, C., Meacock, R., William, W., & Cotterill, S. (2020) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001835 · Cited by 61
Mental health and working conditions among French medical students: A nationwide study
Rolland, F., Hadouiri, N., Haas-Jordache, A., Gouy, E., Mathieu, L., Goulard, A., Morvan, Y., & Frajerman, A. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.001 · Cited by 61
Vagliano, I., Chesnaye, N. C., Leopold, J. H., Jager, K. J., Abu–Hanna, A., & Schut, M. C. (2022) · Clinical Kidney Journal · doi:10.1093/ckj/sfac181 · Cited by 68
A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions
Lijing Lin, A., Sperrin, M., Jenkins, D. A., Martin, G. P., & Peek, N. B. (2021) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research · doi:10.1186/s41512-021-00092-9 · Cited by 60
Variation in Peritoneal Dialysis Time on Therapy by Country
Lambie, M., Zhao, J., McCullough, K. P., Davies, S., Kawanishi, H., Johnson, D. W., Sloand, J. A., Sanabria, M., Kanjanabuch, T., Kim, Y.-L., et al. (2022) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.16341221 · Cited by 60
“8) Body mass index, kg/m(2), n (%) ,20 16 (3) 48 (6) 139 (19) 197 (26) 16 (6) 107 (4) 20–29 339 (68) 516 (65) 573 (77) 508 (68) 198 (69) 1519 (56) 301 141 (28) 231 (29) 33 (4) 40 (5) 74 (26) 1084 (40) Race, n (%) Asian 95 (17) 122 (13) 792 (100) 821 (99) 29 (8) 149 (4) Black 0 (0) 41 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 14 (4) 896 (26) Wh…”
MethodCausal Diagram Techniques for Urologic Oncology Research
Shapiro, D. D., & Msaouel, P. (2020) · Clinical Genitourinary Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2020.08.003 · Cited by 59
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent mental health: a natural experiment
Mansfield, R., Santos, J., Deighton, J., Hayes, D., Velikonja, T., Boehnke, J., & Patalay, P. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211114 · Cited by 47
“While the full regression models are reported as supplementary information, the coefficients for the other variables are not interpreted [29].”
BackgroundPark, S., Choe, J., Hwang, H. J., Noh, H. N., Jung, Y. J., Lee, J.-B., Do, K., Chae, E. J., & Seo, J. B. (2023) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.202303-0410oc · Cited by 58
Silva, F. D. S., Barbosa, Y. C., Batalha, M. A., Ribeiro, M. R. C., Simões, V. M. F., Branco, M. D. R. F. C., Thomaz, É. B. A. F., Queiroz, R. C. D. S., Araújo, W. R. M., & da Sílva, A. A. M. (2018) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/0102-311x00041717 · Cited by 57
Green, M. J., & Popham, F. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6364-y · Cited by 56
“Similarly, the mutually adjusted OR for education represents a direct effect, not mediated via occupation or income [36].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialImpact of CD19 CAR T-cell product type on outcomes in relapsed or refractory aggressive B-NHL
Gauthier, J., Gazeau, N., Hirayama, A. V. V., Hill, J. A., Wu, V., Cearley, A., Perkins, P., Kirk, A., Shadman, M. S., Chow, V. A., et al. (2022) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2021014497 · Cited by 57
Luningham, J. M., Seth, G., Saini, G., Bhattarai, S., Awan, S., Collin, L. J., Swahn, M. H., Dai, D., Gogineni, K., Subhedar, P. D., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38183 · Cited by 56
“20 Census blocks were then ranked as a percentile (1-100) of deprivation relative to the national level; higher ADI scores indicated higher deprivation.”
BackgroundPerinatal risk factors for type 1 diabetes revisited: a population-based register study
Waernbaum, I., Dahlquist, G. G., & Lind, T. (2019) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4874-5 · Cited by 57
Gao, Y., Xiang, L., Yi, H., Song, J., Sun, D., Xu, B., Zhang, G., & Wu, X. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-025-03957-8 · Cited by 54
Nallathambi, Y., & Bhatnagar, T. (2018) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1093/trstmh/try064 · Cited by 54
Predictors of Cigarette Smoking Cessation in Adolescents: A Systematic Review
Vallata, A., O’Loughlin, J. L., Cengelli, S., & Alla, F. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.025 · Cited by 53
Kephart, J. L., Delclòs‐Alió, X., Rodrı́guez, D. A., Sarmiento, O. L., Barrientos‐Gutiérrez, T., Ramírez‐Zea, M., Quistberg, D. A., Bilal, U., & Roux, A. V. D. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00174-6 · Cited by 54
“22 Our study is strengthened by use of a rich dataset, allowing detailed analysis of 1031 subcity areas in 314 cities across five countries that have had some of the most severe COVID-19 outbreaks globally.”
Launders, N., Dotsikas, K., Marston, L., Price, G., Osborn, D., & Hayes, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272498 · Cited by 59
“We identified 11 studies for which SMI was not the main focus, and while inclusion of these studies provides further evidence, caution is needed as they may be subject to confounding and issues of power [90].”
BackgroundSedentary Time in Late Childhood and Cardiometabolic Risk in Adolescence
Stamatakis, E. A., Coombs, N. A., Tiling, K., Mattocks, C., Cooper, A. R., Hardy, L. L., & Lawlor, D. A. (2015) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2014-3750 · Cited by 55
Gray, W. K., Navaratnam, A. V., Day, J., Wendon, J. A., & Briggs, T. W. R. (2021) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218025 · Cited by 52
Flórez, K. R., Dubowitz, T., Ghosh‐Dastidar, M., Beckman, R., & Collins, R. L. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.01.001 · Cited by 50
“The estimates provided for the sociodemographic characteristics in Tables 2 and 3 are direct effects rather than total effects.(52)”
BackgroundPredictors of pain severity trajectory in older adults: a 10.7-year follow-up study
Pan, F., Tian, J., Aitken, D. A., Cicuttini, F., & Jones, G. (2018) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2018.08.002 · Cited by 51
Kuche, D., Moss, C., Eshetu, S., Ayana, G., Salasibew, M. M., Dangour, A. D., & Allen, E. (2019) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12852 · Cited by 51
“…modelling which displays—as a result of modelling a single primary association—figures representing a mixture of different types of causal effect estimates for covariates (secondary, direct and indirect) without explicit distinction or comparability between them (Westreich & Greenland, 2013).”
BackgroundPalm, M. J., Allen, J., Zhang, Y., Tiznado-Aitken, I., Batomen, B., Farber, S., & Widener, M. J. (2022) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-022-10344-2 · Cited by 50
“In addition, the interpretation of estimates from multivariable regression is complex due to interrelationships among predictor variables (Westreich and Greenland 2013).”
An Introduction to Causal Diagrams for Anesthesiology Research
Gaskell, A. L., & SLEIGH, J. W. (2020) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003193 · Cited by 49
Inferential challenges when assessing racial/ethnic health disparities in environmental research
Benmarhnia, T., Hajat, A., & Kaufman, J. S. (2021) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/s12940-020-00689-5 · Cited by 49
Al‐Rousan, T., AlHeresh, R. A., Saadi, A., El-Sabrout, H. R., Young, M., Benmarhnia, T., Han, B. H., & Alshawabkeh, L. I. (2022) · International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.ijcrp.2022.200126 · Cited by 48
“Such practices, also known as the “Table 2 fallacy,” [33] have been identified as a source of confusion in other areas of refugee research.”
BackgroundPerianayagam, A., Prina, M. A., Selvamani, Y., Gudekar, D., Salvi, S., Varghese, M., & Dandona, R. (2022) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00186-9 · Cited by 48
Sheppard, N., Carroll, M. T. C., Gao, C. X., & Lane, T. J. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163272 · Cited by 49
“…2013) to Agency for Health Research Quality (AHRQ) standards using the rubric in Shamsrizi et al. (2020). these are not designed to account for how independent variables may interact (e.g., as mediators or colliders), the statistical associations are less reliable (Westreich and Greenland, 2013).”
InfluentialRevisiting the Table 2 fallacy: A motivating example examining preeclampsia and preterm birth
Bandoli, G., Palmsten, K. K., Chambers, C., Jelliffe‐Pawlowski, L. L., Baer, R. J., & Thompson, C. A. (2018) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/ppe.12474 · Cited by 52
Flook, M., Jackson, C., Vasileiou, E., Simpson, C. R., Muckian, M. D., Agrawal, U., McCowan, C., Jia, Y., Murray, J., Ritchie, L. D., et al. (2021) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-021-05992-1 · Cited by 47
“Where studies focussed on a single risk factor of interest with adjustment for confounding, we extracted all data on potential risks in order to maximise the value of our dataset (whilst accepting that such mutually adjusted estimates for covariates may remain confounded even if that for the primary exposure does not)…”
MethodLabaki, W. W., Gu, T., Murray, S., Curtis, J. L., Wells, J. M., Bhatt, S. P., Bon, J. M., Díaz, A. A., Hersh, C. P., Wan, E. S., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.202210-1887oc · Cited by 49
Yang, H., Sun, B., Ma, W., Fan, L., Xu, K., Jia, Y., Xu, J., Wang, Z., & Yao, F. (2022) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104265 · Cited by 48
Shanahan, L., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Copeland, W., Ribeaud, D., Eisner, M., & Quednow, B. B. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109063 · Cited by 54
Bhatnagar, T., Chaudhuri, S., Ponnaiah, M., Yadav, P. D., Sabarinathan, R., Sahay, R. R., Ahmed, F., Aswathy, S., Bhardwaj, P., Bilimale, A. S., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.033 · Cited by 46
“After ssessing for multi-collinearity, relevant covariates were identified s confounders by comparing the −2 log-likelihood ratio values f the models with and without the potential confounder(s) as er the conceptual framework based on directed acyclic graphs Westreich and Greenland, 2013 ).”
Simon, E. G., Bechraoui‐Quantin, S., Tapia, S., Cottenet, J., Mariet, A., Cottin, Y., Giroud, M., Eicher, J., Thilaganathan, B., & Quantin, C. (2023) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.021 · Cited by 45
Widen, E. M., Factor-Litvak, P. R., Gallagher, D., Paxton, A., Pierson, R. N., Heymsfield, S. B., & Lederman, S. A. (2015) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-015-1747-5 · Cited by 45
“Effect estimates of our primary covariate of interest, GWG pattern, and effect estimates of secondary covariates (prepregnancy BMI, initial body composition) are reported; other effect estimates are not included in the tables to limit potential misunderstanding of associations [26].”
Blue-collar work and women's health: A systematic review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015
Elser, H. C., Falconi, A. M., Bass, M. B., & Cullen, M. R. (2018) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.002 · Cited by 49
“Direct interpretation of the effect estimates for secondary risk factors, therefore, do not necessarily represent total effect estimates, and may be confounded even when the effect estimate for the main exposure is not (Westreich and Greenland, 2013).”
BackgroundRanapurwala, S. I., Naumann, R. B., Austin, A. E., Dasgupta, N., & Marshall, S. W. (2018) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.4564 · Cited by 44
“This results in so called “table 2 fallacy,” a term that refers to improper interpretations of effect estimates and potential selection bias.(47) Fourth, most studies failed to account for time‐varying opioid exposure and confounding by indication (eg, patient selection for abuse‐deterrent formulations).”
BackgroundYu, D., Jordan, K. P., Snell, K. I. E., Riley, R. D., Bedson, J., Edwards, J., Mallen, C. D., Tan, V., Ukachukwu, V., Prieto‐Alhambra, D., et al. (2018) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213894 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Westreich, D., & Greenland, S.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Westreich, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-01-30
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 292-298
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- PMC
- PMC3626058
- OpenAlex
- W2138008655
- Cited by
- 1,276
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 177 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 212 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 192 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AI064518)
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University
- University of California, Los Angeles
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI064518)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R00HD063961)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- causal graphs, confounding, odds ratio, logistic regression
- MeSH terms
- HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Mathematical Computing, North Carolina, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Smoking, Statistics as Topic, Violence, Work, HIV Infections, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Epidemiologic Studies, Risk Assessment, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review