Cited by 378Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Facebook Use With Compromised Well-Being: A Longitudinal Study

Shakya, Holly B., Christakis, Nicholas A.·2017·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Face-to-face social interactions enhance well-being. With the ubiquity of social media, important questions have arisen about the impact of online social interactions. In the present study, we assessed the associations of both online and offline social networks with several subjective measures of well-being. We used 3 waves (2013, 2014, and 2015) of data from 5,208 subjects in the nationally representative Gallup Panel Social Network Study survey, including social network measures, in combination with objective measures of Facebook use. We investigated the associations of Facebook activity and real-world social network activity with self-reported physical health, self-reported mental health, self-reported life satisfaction, and body mass index. Our results showed that overall, the use of Facebook was negatively associated with well-being. For example, a 1-standard-deviation increase in "likes clicked" (clicking "like" on someone else's content), "links clicked" (clicking a link to another site or article), or "status updates" (updating one's own Facebook status) was associated with a decrease of 5%-8% of a standard deviation in self-reported mental health. These associations were robust to multivariate cross-sectional analyses, as well as to 2-wave prospective analyses. The negative associations of Facebook use were comparable to or greater in magnitude than the positive impact of offline interactions, which suggests a possible tradeoff between offline and online relationship…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kww189

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.63 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0278-6133.19.1.28 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–377 of 377

Metadata

Authors
Shakya, H. B., & Christakis, N. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Shakya, Holly B.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2017-01-16
Volume
185
Issue
3
Pages
203-211
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2573955387
Cited by
378
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 11
FWCI
83.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
Facebook use, social media, well-being, mental health, life satisfaction, physical health, body mass index, social networking sites, offline social interaction, social network activity, status updates
MeSH terms
Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Mental Health, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, United States, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Self Report, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review