Cited by 3Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPharmacy and Medical PracticesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Description of a pharmacist-led employee wellness hypertension program utilizing remote monitoring devices

Gushrowski, Megan N, Rush, Michael J, Kier, Karen L, Hinson, Jessica·2025·American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

Abstract

PURPOSE: The design, implementation, and impact of a pharmacist-led employee wellness hypertension program that utilizes remote blood pressure monitoring are described. SUMMARY: Employees of a private university and health insurance beneficiaries with a diagnosis of hypertension or a documented high blood pressure reading at a previous screening encounter were eligible to participate in the program. Participants received a remote blood pressure monitoring device and followed up with a pharmacist in person or via telehealth throughout the program. The pharmacist provided education on lifestyle modifications to improve blood pressure control, and recommendations regarding changes to the participant's medication therapy were made to the participant's primary care provider. Participants completed an in-person appointment at month 3 of the program for blood pressure reassessment. Twenty-four participants were enrolled in the program. The mean baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 134 mm Hg and 85 mm Hg, respectively. Of the total of 24 participants, 18 participants (75%) had a blood pressure above their goal at baseline. At month 3 of the program, 7 of these 18 participants (39%) had achieved their blood pressure goal, with average systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreases of 8.9 mm Hg and 7.8 mm Hg, respectively. Pharmacist recommendations to primary care providers regarding medication changes had an acceptance rate of 70%. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led employee wellness hypertension monitoring program that utilized remote monitoring devices improved employee blood pressure control through education on lifestyle modifications and medication recommendations to the participants' primary care providers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajhp/zxaf084

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gushrowski, M. N., Rush, M. J., Kier, K. L., & Hinson, J.
Affiliations
Ohio Northern University (US)
Corresponding author
Gushrowski, Megan N
Venue
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Published
2025-04-10
Volume
82
Issue
22
Pages
1265-1270
ISSN
  • 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-2900
OpenAlex
W4409347031
Cited by
3
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
pharmacist intervention, employee wellness, hypertension, remote blood pressure monitoring, telemedicine, blood pressure control, health insurance beneficiaries, university employees
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Health Services, Pharmacists, Telemedicine, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review