Cited by 16Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Evaluation of Alcohol Screening and Community-Based Brief Interventions in Rural Western Kenya: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Takahashi, Risa, Wilunda, Calistus, Magutah, Karani, Mwaura-Tenambergen, Wanja, Atwoli, Lukoye, Perngparn, Usaneya·2018·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of community-based alcohol brief interventions (ABI) implemented by community-health workers with and without motivational talks (MT) by former drinkers, in reducing harmful and hazardous alcohol consumption. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm quasi-experimental study (one control and two intervention groups) between May and December 2015 in Kakamega County, Kenya. Participants were hazardous or harmful alcohol drinkers with an Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of 8-19 at baseline. One intervention group received only ABI while the other received ABI + MT. The interventions' effects on AUDIT scores were analysed using linear mixed models. Logistic regression was used to analyse the interventions' effects on low-risk drinking (AUDIT score <8) after 6 months. RESULTS: The study included 161 participants: 52 in the control group, 52 in the only ABI group and 57 in the ABI + MT group. The mean AUDIT scores were lower in the intervention groups at 1, 3 and 6 months post-intervention; the ABI + MT group showed a greater reduction. The mean AUDIT scores over a 6-month period were lower in both intervention groups compared with the control group. The odds of low-risk drinking were almost two times higher in both intervention groups than in the control group, although the effect of only ABI on low-risk drinking was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: ABI + MT and only ABI were associated with a reduced mean AUDIT score among hazardous and high-risk drinkers in this resource-limited setting. ABI + MT was also associated with low-risk drinking in this population. SHORT SUMMARY: Community-based alcohol brief interventions implemented by community-health workers accompanied by motivational talks by former drinkers were associated with reduced hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in a rural setting in western Kenya.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agx083

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adults in Kenya with an AUDIT score of 8-19, unadjusted mean AUDIT scores were reduced in all three study groups between baseline and 6-month assessment, with greater reduction in adjusted mean AUDIT scores in the intervention groups than in the control group, and the greatest reduction in the ABI + MT group.

    “Unadjusted mean AUDIT scores were reduced in all three study groups between the baseline and 6-month assessment post-intervention, with reductions from 13.4 to 9.4, 14.4 to 7.7 and 14.1 to 6.6 in the control, only ABI and ABI + MT groups, respectively. Over time, there was a greater reduction in the adjusted mean AUDIT scores in the intervention groups than in the control group, with the greatest”
  • Of the studies in which the duration of each session was provided, the amount of time spent across all sessions ranged from 15 minutes to 4 hours.

    “Of the studies in which the duration of each session was provided, the amount of time spent across all sessions ranged from 15 minutes ([96] to 4 hours ([76] (Table 2).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, R., Wilunda, C., Magutah, K., Mwaura-Tenambergen, W., Atwoli, L., & Perngparn, U.
Affiliations
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Moi University (KE)
  • Kenya Methodist University (KE)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Risa
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2017-10-26
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
121-128
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2765269072
Cited by
16
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
brief alcohol intervention, community health workers, motivational talks, former drinkers, alcohol screening, auditing, hazardous drinking, low-risk drinking, rural health care, resource-limited settings, Western Kenya
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Community Health Workers, Community Health Services, Female, Humans, Kenya, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review