Cited by 47Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsMental Health Treatment and Access

Psychosocial interventions for reducing alcohol consumption in sub-Saharan African settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Sileo, Katelyn M., Miller, Amanda P., Wagman, Jennifer A., Kiene, Susan M.·2021·Addiction

Abstract

Background: Harmful alcohol use is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sub‐Saharan Africa (sSA); however, the effects of non‐pharmacological alcohol interventions in this region are unknown. Design: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the available literature through 14 March 2019 was undertaken. Two authors extracted and reconciled relevant data and assessed risk of bias. Meta‐analyses were conducted. The review protocol is registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42019094509). Setting: Studies conducted in sSA were eligible for inclusion. Participants: Individuals participating in interventions aimed at reducing alcohol use. Interventions: Randomized and non‐randomized controlled trials testing non‐pharmacological interventions (psychosocial and structural) on alcohol consumption in sSA. Measurements: Eligible outcomes included the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores; alcohol abstinence; measures of drinking quantity and frequency; and biomarkers of alcohol consumption. Findings: Nineteen intervention trials (18 reports) testing psychosocial interventions (no structural interventions included), judged of moderate quality, were included in meta‐analyses. A beneficial effect was identified for psychosocial interventions on alcohol abstinence at 3–6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20–3.48, k = 5, n = 2312, I 2 = 79%] and 12–60 months (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.40–2.61, k = 6, n = 2737, I 2 = 63%) follow‐up. There were no statistically significant effects found for AUDIT score [2–3 months: mean differences (MD) = −1.13, 95% CI = −2.60 to 0.34, k = 6, n = 992, I 2 = 85%; 6 months: MD = −0.83, 95% CI = −1.92 to 0.26, k = 6, n = 1081, I 2 = 69%; 12 months: MD = −0.15, 95% CI = −1.66 to 1.36, k = 4; n = 677; I 2 = 75%], drinks per drinking day (3 months: MD = –0.22, 95% CI = −2.51 to 2.07, k = 2, n = 359, I 2 = 82%; 6–36 months: MD = −0.09, 95% CI = −0.49 to 0.30, k = 3, n = 1450, I 2 = 60%) or percentage of drinking days (3 months: MD = −4.60, 95% = −21.14 to 11.94; k = 2; n = 361; I 2 = 90%; 6–9 months: MD = 1.96, 95% CI = −6.54 to 10.46; k = 2; n = 818; I 2 = 88%). Conclusion: Psychosocial interventions show promise at increasing self‐reported alcohol abstinence in sSA, but clinical, methodological and statistical heterogeneity across meta‐analytical outcomes suggests that results should be interpreted with caution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.15227

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two additional reviews examined the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions more generally on hazardous and harmful alcohol use in Sub-Saharan Africa and LMICs, respectively.

    “Two additional reviews examined the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions more generally on hazardous and harmful alcohol use in Sub‐Saharan Africa and LMICs, respectively (Preusse 2020; Sileo 2021).”

    From Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as Sileo 2021

    The Discussion (page unavailable) confirms that Sileo 2021 reviewed the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on alcohol consumption. But the sentence’s “respectively” assigns the LMIC-wide review to Sileo, whereas its Discussion and Results limit the review to sub-Saharan African settings; the Results list studies from seven countries in that region. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa identified 19 intervention trials of moderate quality that showed some evidence of the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for promoting the odds of abstinence, but did not identify effects on hazardous or harmful alcohol use or consumption.

    “The systematic review and meta‐analysis conducted in Sub‐Saharan Africa identified 19 intervention trials (including randomized and non‐randomized designs) of moderate quality that showed some evidence of the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for promoting the odds of abstinence, but did not identify effects on hazardous or harmful alcohol use or consumption.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]Malekinejad M, Barker R, Wu J, Loi J, Mirzazadeh A. Systematic review [internet]. Global Health Decisions: University of California San Franscisco [ accessed 2019 Oct]. Available from: http://globalhealthdecisions.org/methods/systematic-review/
  2. [28]Papas RK, Gakinya BN, Mwaniki MM, Lee H, Keter AK, Klein MP, Successful treatment outcomes from a stage 2 randomized clinical trial of CBT to reduce alcohol use among HIV-infected outpatients in Western Kenya. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2017; 41: 253A.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sileo, K. M., Miller, A. P., Wagman, J. A., & Kiene, S. M.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sileo, Katelyn M.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-15
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
457-473
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W3049077469
Cited by
47
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5T32MH020031‐18)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (7K01AA024068‐05)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA23356)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychosocial interventions, alcohol consumption, alcohol consumption reduction, alcohol abstinence, AUDIT score, hazardous drinking, sub-Saharan Africa, non-pharmacological treatment, alcohol screening, brief intervention, alcohol marketing regulation, alcohol pricing, alcohol taxation, alcohol advertising ban, alcohol availability
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Intervention, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Humans, Africa South of the Sahara, Alcohol Abstinence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review