Cited by 72Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsBehavioral Health and Interventions

The Cochrane 2018 Review on Brief Interventions in Primary Care for Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Consumption: A Distillation for Clinicians and Policy Makers

Open access
Beyer, F R, Campbell, F, Bertholet, N, Daeppen, J B, Saunders, J B, Pienaar, E D, Muirhead, C R, Kaner, E F S·2019·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: An updated Cochrane systematic review assessed effectiveness of screening and brief intervention to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in general practice or emergency care settings. This paper summarises the implications of the review for clinicians. METHODS: Cochrane methods were followed. Reporting accords with PRISMA guidance. We searched multiple resources to September 2017, seeking randomised controlled trials of brief interventions to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in people attending general practice, emergency care or other primary care settings for reasons other than alcohol treatment. Brief intervention was defined as a conversation comprising five or fewer sessions of brief advice or brief lifestyle counselling and a total duration of less than 60 min. Our primary outcome was alcohol consumption, measured as or convertible to grams per week. We conducted meta-analyses to assess change in consumption, and subgroup analyses to explore the impact of participant and intervention characteristics. RESULTS: We included 69 studies, of which 42 were added for this update. Most studies (88%) compared brief intervention to control. The primary meta-analysis included 34 studies and provided moderate-quality evidence that brief intervention reduced consumption compared to control after one year (mean difference -20 g/wk, 95% confidence interval -28 to -12). Subgroup analysis showed a similar effect for men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Brief interventions can reduce harmful and hazardous alcohol consumption in men and women. Short, advice-based interventions may be as effective as extended, counselling-based interventions for patients with harmful levels of alcohol use who are presenting for the first time in a primary care setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agz035

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analytic evidence indicates that BIs are effective for treating harmful substance use.

    “Most importantly, meta-analytic evidence indicates that BIs are effective for treating harmful substance use [14,20].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Summary of main results and clinical importance reports that brief interventions reduced alcohol consumption compared with controls in a primary-care meta-analysis. The Background limits the review to hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption and says these interventions are not intended for people with alcohol dependence. The source therefore supports effectiveness for reducing harmful drinking, but not the broader claim about treating harmful substance use generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BIs are time-limited and can be delivered in various settings including primary healthcare, criminal justice systems, and schools.

    “Firstly, BIs are time-limited, and can be delivered in various settings including primary healthcare [14], criminal justice systems [15], and schools [16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (2011) Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Higgins JPT and Green Ss (eds), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 510 (updated March 2011) : The Cochrane Collaboration.
  2. Miller WR and Sanchez VC (1994) Motivating young adults for treatment and lifestyle change. In G Hs (ed), Issues in alcohol use and misuse by young adults . Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  3. Review Manager (2014) Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beyer, F. R., Campbell, F., Bertholet, N., Daeppen, J. B., Saunders, J. B., Pienaar, E. D., Muirhead, C. R., & Kaner, E. F. S.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Beyer, F R
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
417-427
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2944787094
Cited by
72
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
brief intervention, screening and brief intervention, hazardous drinking, alcohol consumption reduction, primary care, general practice, emergency care, brief advice, sex differences, alcohol policy
MeSH terms
Administrative Personnel, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Dangerous Behavior, Humans, Physicians, Primary Health Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review