Cited by 91Multiple and Secondary Primary CancersSmoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Tobacco smoking and the risk of subsequent primary cancer among cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study

Open access
Tabuchi, T., Ito, Y., Ioka, A., Nakayama, T., Miyashiro, I., Tsukuma, H.·2013·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background Smoking is a well-known risk factor for cancer; however, there is little evidence as to whether the smoking status of cancer survivors has any risk for subsequent primary cancer (SPC) incidence, regardless of the first cancer sites.Patients and methods In total, 29,795 eligible patients with a first cancer between 1985 and 2004 were examined for SPC until the end of 2006, using a record linkage between hospital-based and population-based cancer registries. The association between smoking at the time of the first cancer diagnosis and three SPC groups (i.e. specific SPC, smoking-related SPCs, and all SPCs) was calculated by Poisson regression.Results Ever smokers had 59% and 102% higher risk for all SPCs and smoking-related SPCs, respectively, than never smokers. Cancer survivors who had recently stopped smoking had 18% and 26% less risk, respectively, for these SPCs than those who smoked at the diagnosis. We also found that, compared with those who had never smoked, cancer survivors who had ever smoked had a significantly elevated risk of oral/pharyngeal, esophageal, stomach, lung, and hematological SPCs, regardless of the first cancer sites.Conclusions These findings indicate that smoking increases not only the first cancer but also a second or SPC. Moreover, the results from recent quitters versus current smokers suggest that smoking cessation may decrease the risk for SPC, especially for smoking-related SPCs in cancer survivors. Preventive measures are necessary to reduce not only SPC incidence but also tobacco use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdt279

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-diagnosis smoking is associated with an increased risk of second primary cancers.

    “increased risk of second primary cancers,11”

    From Efficacy of smartphone applications to help cancer patients quit smoking: Protocol of the Quit2Heal randomized controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Abstract reports that smoking status at the first cancer diagnosis was associated with subsequent primary cancer risk. But the Limitations section says smoking was not assessed during follow-up, so the study cannot establish the association specifically for post-diagnosis smoking. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]6. Engeland A, Bjorge T, Haldorsen T et al. Use of multiple primary cancers to indicate associations between smoking and cancer incidence: an analysis of 500,000 cancer cases diagnosed in Norway during 1953-93. Int J Cancer 1997; 70: 401-407.
  2. [15]15. Fujimoto I, Hanai A, Hiyama T et al. Cancer registration in Osaka. In Osaka Cancer Registry (ed.), Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Osaka 1963-1989. Tokyo: Shinohara Publishers, Inc. 1993.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tabuchi, T., Ito, Y., Ioka, A., Nakayama, T., Miyashiro, I., & Tsukuma, H.
Affiliations
Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
Corresponding author
Tabuchi, T.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
2699-2704
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167596813
Cited by
91
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health
  • Labour and Welfare (H22-011)
  • Osaka Cancer Society (H23)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
smoking, cancer survivors, secondary malignancies, smoking cessation, oral and pharyngeal cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, hematologic cancer, cancer risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Risk Factors, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Survivors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review