The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Open accessAbstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
(1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82982-6 · Cited by 16,049
Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra072149 · Cited by 8,748
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1970) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85851-2 · Cited by 8,501
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936
Moch, H., Cubilla, A. L., Humphrey, P. A., Reuter, V. E., & Ulbright, T. M. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029 · Cited by 3,086
(1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.2.594 · Cited by 1,929
TNM: CLASSIFICATION OF MALIGNANT TUMOURS
(1969) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1969.tb116971.x · Cited by 1,382
Williams, S. D., Birch, R., Einhorn, L. H., Irwin, L., Greco, F. A., & Loehrer, P. J. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198706043162302 · Cited by 1,170
Mead, G. M., Stenning, S. P., Cook, P. A., Fosså, S. D., Horwich, A., Kaye, S. B., Oliver, R. T. D., deMulder, P., deWit, R., Stoter, G., et al. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 1,033
Self-citation
Cited by
Human germ cell tumours from a developmental perspective
Oosterhuis, J. W., & Looijenga, L. H. J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0178-9 · Cited by 328
Lobo, J., Constâncio, V., Leite-Silva, P., Guimarães, R., Cantante, M., Braga, I., Maurício, J., Looijenga, L. H. J., Henrique, R., & Jerónimo, C. (2021) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-021-01048-y · Cited by 28
Pęksa, R., Kunc, M., Popęda, M., Piątek, M., Bieńkowski, M., Żok, J., Starzyńska, A., Perdyan, A., Sowa, M., Duchnowska, R., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13081750 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Honecker, F., Aparicio, J., Berney, D., Beyer, J., Bokemeyer, C., Cathomas, R., Clarke, N., Cohn-Cedermark, G., Daugaard, G., Dieckmann, K.-P., Fizazi, K., Fosså, S., Germa-Lluch, J. R., Giannatempo, P., Gietema, J. A., Gillessen, S., Haugnes, H. S., Heidenreich, A., Hemminki, K., Huddart, R., Jewett, M. A. S., Joly, F., Lauritsen, J., Lorch, A., Necchi, A., Nicolai, N., Oing, C., Oldenburg, J., Ondruš, D., Papachristofilou, A., Powles, T., Sohaib, A., Ståhl, O., Tandstad, T., Toner, G., & Horwich, A.
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1658-1686
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2886615577
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 37.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdy217
- The paper
- Honecker, F., Aparicio, J., Berney, D., Beyer, J., Bokemeyer, C., Cathomas, R., Clarke, N., Cohn-Cedermark, G., Daugaard, G., Dieckmann, K.-P., Fizazi, K., Fosså, S., Germa-Lluch, J. R., Giannatempo, P., Gietema, J. A., Gillessen, S., Haugnes, H. S., Heidenreich, A., Hemminki, K., . . . Horwich, A. (2018). ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
