The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study
Open accessAbstract
Background: The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX. Patients and methods: Overall, 303 patients aged ≥18 years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8 weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression. Results: In total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib, n = 64; crizotinib, n = 58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib, n = 21; crizotinib, n = 22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib, n = 25; crizotinib, n = 21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P < 0.0001). CNS ORR was 85.7% with alectinib versus 71.4% with crizotinib in patients who received prior radiotherapy and 78.6% versus 40.0%, respectively, in those who had not. Conclusion: Alectinib demonstrated superior CNS activity and significantly delayed CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK+ NSCLC, irrespective of prior CNS disease or radiotherapy. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02075840.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in ALK -Positive Lung Cancer
Solomon, B. J., Mok, T., Kim, D.-W., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Mekhail, T., Felip, E., Cappuzzo, F., Paolini, J., Usari, T., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408440 · Cited by 3,190
Self-citationAlectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK -Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Peters, S., Camidge, D. R., Shaw, A. T., Gadgeel, S., Ahn, J. S., Kim, D.-W., Ou, S.-H. I., Pérol, M., Dziadziuszko, R., Rosell, R., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1704795 · Cited by 2,527
Self-citationSoria, J.-C., Tan, D. S. W., Chiari, R., Wu, Y.-L., Paz-Ares, L., Wolf, J., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Cortinovis, D., Yu, C.-J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30123-x · Cited by 1,151
Shaw, A. T., Gandhi, L., Gadgeel, S., Riely, G. J., Cetnar, J., West, H., Camidge, D. R., Socinski, M. A., Chiappori, A., Mekhail, T., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00488-x · Cited by 638
Self-citation
Cited by
Hendriks, L. E., Kerr, K. M., Menis, J., Mok, T. S., Nestle, U., Passaro, A., Peters, S., Planchard, D., Smit, E. F., Solomon, B. J., et al. (2023) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.009 · Cited by 853
Self-citationTreatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline
Vogelbaum, M. A., Brown, P. D., Messersmith, H., Brastianos, P. K., Burri, S., Cahill, D., Dunn, I. F., Gaspar, L. E., Gatson, N. T. N., Gondi, V., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.02314 · Cited by 832
Non‐small cell lung cancer in China
Chen, P., Liu, Y., Wen, Y., & Zhou, C. (2022) · Cancer Communications · doi:10.1002/cac2.12359 · Cited by 656
Drilon, A., Siena, S., Dziadziuszko, R., Barlesi, F., Krebs, M. G., Shaw, A. T., de Braud, F., Rolfo, C., Ahn, M.-J., Wolf, J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30690-4 · Cited by 528
Self-citationCamidge, D. R., Dziadziuszko, R., Peters, S., Mok, T., Noe, J., Nowicka, M., Gadgeel, S. M., Cheema, P., Pavlakis, N., de Marinis, F., et al. (2019) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.03.007 · Cited by 490
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gadgeel, S., Peters, S., Mok, T., Shaw, A. T., Kim, D. W., Ou, S. I., Pérol, M., Wrona, A., Novello, S., Rosell, R., Zeaiter, A., Liu, T., Nüesch, E., Balas, B., & Camidge, D. R.
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2214-2222
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890523839
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdy405
- The paper
- Gadgeel, S., Peters, S., Mok, T., Shaw, A. T., Kim, D. W., Ou, S. I., Pérol, M., Wrona, A., Novello, S., Rosell, R., Zeaiter, A., Liu, T., Nüesch, E., Balas, B., & Camidge, D. R. (2018). Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.