Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1–2 trials

Open access
Drilon, Alexander, Siena, Salvatore, Dziadziuszko, Rafal, Barlesi, Fabrice, Krebs, Matthew G, Shaw, Alice T, de Braud, Filippo, Rolfo, Christian, Ahn, Myung-Ju, Wolf, Jürgen, Seto, Takashi, Cho, Byoung Chul, Patel, Manish R, Chiu, Chao-Hua, John, Thomas, Goto, Koichi, Karapetis, Christos S, Arkenau, Hendrick-Tobias, Kim, Sang-We, Ohe, Yuichiro, Li, Yu-Chung, Chae, Young K, Chung, Christine H, Otterson, Gregory A, Murakami, Haruyasu, Lin, Chia-Chi, Tan, Daniel S W, Prenen, Hans, Riehl, Todd, Chow-Maneval, Edna, Simmons, Brian, Cui, Na, Johnson, Ann, Eng, Susan, Wilson, Timothy R, Doebele, Robert C·2020·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Summary Background Recurrent gene fusions, such as ROS1 fusions, are oncogenic drivers of various cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Up to 36% of patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC have brain metastases at the diagnosis of advanced disease. Entrectinib is a ROS1 inhibitor that has been designed to effectively penetrate and remain in the CNS. We explored the use of entrectinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. Methods We did an integrated analysis of three ongoing phase 1 or 2 trials of entrectinib (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2). The efficacy-evaluable population included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who received entrectinib at a dose of at least 600 mg orally once per day, with at least 12 months’ follow-up. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and previous cancer treatment (except for ROS1 inhibitors) was allowed. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with an objective response (complete or partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and duration of response, and were evaluated by blinded independent central review. The safety-evaluable population for the safety analysis included all patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC in the three trials who received at least one dose of entrectinib (irrespective of dose or duration of follow-up). These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88 (ALKA-372-001). Findings Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018), 41 (77%; 95% CI 64—88) of 53 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population had an objective response. Median follow-up was 15·5 months (IQR 13·4–20·2). Median duration of response was 24·6 months (95% CI 11·4–34·8). In the safety-evaluable population, 79 (59%) of 134 patients had grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events. 46 (34%) of 134 patients had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being weight increase (ten [8%]) and neutropenia (five [4%]). 15 (11%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events, the most common of which were nervous system disorders (four [3%]) and cardiac disorders (three [2%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation Entrectinib is active with durable disease control in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, and is well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, making it amenable to long-term dosing in these patients. These data highlight the need to routinely test for ROS1 fusions to broaden therapeutic options for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. Funding Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30690-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
Drilon, A., Siena, S., Dziadziuszko, R., Barlesi, F., Krebs, M. G., Shaw, A. T., de Braud, F., Rolfo, C., Ahn, M.-J., Wolf, J., Seto, T., Cho, B. C., Patel, M. R., Chiu, C.-H., John, T., Goto, K., Karapetis, C. S., Arkenau, H.-T., Kim, S.-W., Ohe, Y., Li, Y.-C., Chae, Y. K., Chung, C. H., Otterson, G. A., Murakami, H., Lin, C.-C., Tan, D. S. W., Prenen, H., Riehl, T., Chow-Maneval, E., Simmons, B., Cui, N., Johnson, A., Eng, S., Wilson, T. R., & Doebele, R. C.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
261-270
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995220921
Cited by
528
References
29
FWCI
41.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1–2 trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30690-4
The paper
Drilon, A., Siena, S., Dziadziuszko, R., Barlesi, F., Krebs, M. G., Shaw, A. T., de Braud, F., Rolfo, C., Ahn, M.-J., Wolf, J., Seto, T., Cho, B. C., Patel, M. R., Chiu, C.-H., John, T., Goto, K., Karapetis, C. S., Arkenau, H.-T., Kim, S.-W., . . . Doebele, R. C. (2020). Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1–2 trials. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30690-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.