Cited by 307Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Molecular Biology ResearchEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The effect of stress on genome regulation and structure

Open access
MADLUNG, A.·2004·Annals of Botany

Abstract

Background Stresses exert evolutionary pressures on all organisms, which have developed sophisticated responses to cope and survive. These responses involve cellular physiology, gene regulation and genome remodelling. Scope In this review, the effects of stress on genomes and the connected responses are considered. Recent developments in our understanding of epigenetic genome regulation, including the role of RNA interference (RNAi), suggest a function for this in stress initiation and response. We review our knowledge of how different stresses, tissue culture, pathogen attack, abiotic stress, and hybridization, affect genomes. Using allopolyploid hybridization as an example, we examine mechanisms that may mediate genomic responses, focusing on RNAi-mediated perturbations. Conclusions A common response to stresses may be the relaxation of epigenetic regulation, leading to activation of suppressed sequences and secondary effects as regulatory systems attempt to re-establish genomic order.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mch172

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global DNA methylation is the most evaluated epigenetic somaclonal variation; in plants it is at higher levels than in other eukaryotes and is correlated with expression of different genes and changes in mobility of transposable elements.

    “The most evaluated epigenetic somaclonal variation is global DNA methylation, which, in plants, is at higher levels compared with other eukaryotes, and is correlated with the expression of different genes, and changes in the mobility of the numerous transposable elements presented in plant genomes [99,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MADLUNG, A.
Affiliations
University of Puget Sound (US)
Corresponding author
MADLUNG, A.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2004-08-19
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
481-495
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2111659126
Cited by
307
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
stress response, genome regulation, epigenetic regulation, RNA interference, pathogen attack, abiotic stress, tissue culture, genome rearrangement
MeSH terms
Climate, Plant Diseases, Plants, Polyploidy, Transcription, Genetic, DNA, Plant, Genome, Plant, RNA, Plant, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Silencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review