Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimation of the Nuclear DNA Content of Gossypium Species

Open access
HENDRIX, B.·2005·Annals of Botany

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gossypium is an economically important, globally distributed taxon comprising more than 50 species. DNA content estimates from about half of the species indicate over a 3-fold variation exists. However, the nine DNA content estimates for G. hirsutum reveal over a 2-fold difference for this species alone. Recent reports have shown that several plant compounds can bias DNA content estimates obtained by commonly used methods. The purpose of this research was to examine the standardization procedures used for DNA content determinations with flow cytometry as applied to Gossypium, and generate revised DNA content estimates for all available Gossypium species using best-standard practices. METHODS: Flow cytometry was used to measure fluorescence of isolated Gossypium nuclei stained with propidium iodide. Fluorescence values were converted to DNA content estimates based on the nuclear fluorescence of standard genotypes of barley, corn and rice. Various combinations of nuclei preparations relative to the standards were evaluated for their influence on the estimates. KEY RESULTS: Both external standardization and internal standardization with Oryza sativa 'IR36' yielded statistically similar DNA content estimates for Gossypium. Internal standardization with Hordeum vulgare 'Sultan' resulted in a high estimate of DNA content. Nuclear DNA content estimates were generated for 37 Gossypium species using external standardization. Estimates of ancestral genome sizes reveal that both increases and decreases in nuclear DNA content have occurred. Variation in intraspecific and intragenomic DNA content was low, and the allopolyploid AD-genome size was nearly the additive of its progenitor genomes. CONCLUSIONS: Due to unknown factors, internal standardization with H. vulgare 'Sultan' may not be appropriate for DNA content determinations of Gossypium. The current DNA content estimates support accepted cytogenetic divisions of the genus. Gossypium is a genus that exhibits genome constancy both through speciation within genomic groups and allopolyploidization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mci078

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
HENDRIX, B.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2005-02-08
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
789-797
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2142972505
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of the Nuclear DNA Content of Gossypium Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mci078
The paper
HENDRIX, B. (2005). Estimation of the Nuclear DNA Content of Gossypium Species. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.