The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of the Nuclear DNA Content of Gossypium Species
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gossypium is an economically important, globally distributed taxon comprising more than 50 species. DNA content estimates from about half of the species indicate over a 3-fold variation exists. However, the nine DNA content estimates for G. hirsutum reveal over a 2-fold difference for this species alone. Recent reports have shown that several plant compounds can bias DNA content estimates obtained by commonly used methods. The purpose of this research was to examine the standardization procedures used for DNA content determinations with flow cytometry as applied to Gossypium, and generate revised DNA content estimates for all available Gossypium species using best-standard practices. METHODS: Flow cytometry was used to measure fluorescence of isolated Gossypium nuclei stained with propidium iodide. Fluorescence values were converted to DNA content estimates based on the nuclear fluorescence of standard genotypes of barley, corn and rice. Various combinations of nuclei preparations relative to the standards were evaluated for their influence on the estimates. KEY RESULTS: Both external standardization and internal standardization with Oryza sativa 'IR36' yielded statistically similar DNA content estimates for Gossypium. Internal standardization with Hordeum vulgare 'Sultan' resulted in a high estimate of DNA content. Nuclear DNA content estimates were generated for 37 Gossypium species using external standardization. Estimates of ancestral genome sizes reveal that both increases and decreases in nuclear DNA content have occurred. Variation in intraspecific and intragenomic DNA content was low, and the allopolyploid AD-genome size was nearly the additive of its progenitor genomes. CONCLUSIONS: Due to unknown factors, internal standardization with H. vulgare 'Sultan' may not be appropriate for DNA content determinations of Gossypium. The current DNA content estimates support accepted cytogenetic divisions of the genus. Gossypium is a genus that exhibits genome constancy both through speciation within genomic groups and allopolyploidization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, F., Fan, G., Lu, C., Xiao, G., Zou, C., Kohel, R. J., Ma, Z., Shang, H., Ma, X., Wu, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3208 · Cited by 1,111
The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii
Wang, K., Wang, Z., Li, F., Ye, W., Wang, J., Song, G., Yue, Z., Cong, L., Shang, H., Zhu, S., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2371 · Cited by 1,009
Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum
Li, F., Fan, G., Wang, K., Sun, F., Yuan, Y., Song, G., Li, Q., Ma, Z., Lu, C., Zou, C., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2987 · Cited by 870
The polyploidy revolution then…and now: Stebbins revisited
Soltis, D. E., Visger, C. J., & Soltis, P. S. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400178 · Cited by 517
Polyploidy: Pitfalls and paths to a paradigm
Soltis, D. E., Visger, C. J., Marchant, D. B., & Soltis, P. S. (2016) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1500501 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- HENDRIX, B.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-08
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 789-797
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2142972505
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of the Nuclear DNA Content of Gossypium Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mci078
- The paper
- HENDRIX, B. (2005). Estimation of the Nuclear DNA Content of Gossypium Species. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.