The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root Structure and Functioning for Efficient Acquisition of Phosphorus: Matching Morphological and Physiological Traits
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Global phosphorus (P) reserves are being depleted, with half-depletion predicted to occur between 2040 and 2060. Most of the P applied in fertilizers may be sorbed by soil, and not be available for plants lacking specific adaptations. On the severely P-impoverished soils of south-western Australia and the Cape region in South Africa, non-mycorrhizal species exhibit highly effective adaptations to acquire P. A wide range of these non-mycorrhizal species, belonging to two monocotyledonous and eight dicotyledonous families, produce root clusters. Non-mycorrhizal species with root clusters appear to be particularly effective at accessing P when its availability is extremely low. SCOPE: There is a need to develop crops that are highly effective at acquiring inorganic P (Pi) from P-sorbing soils. Traits such as those found in non-mycorrhizal root-cluster-bearing species in Australia, South Africa and other P-impoverished environments are highly desirable for future crops. Root clusters combine a specialized structure with a specialized metabolism. Native species with such traits could be domesticated or crossed with existing crop species. An alternative approach would be to develop future crops with root clusters based on knowledge of the genes involved in development and functioning of root clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Root clusters offer enormous potential for future research of both a fundamental and a strategic nature. New discoveries of the development and functioning of root clusters in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous families are essential to produce new crops with superior P-acquisition traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Cited by
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Self-citationResponses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review
Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs285 · Cited by 617
Kohlen, W., Charnikhova, T., Liu, Q., Bours, R., Domagalska, M. A., Beguerie, S., Verstappen, F., Leyser, O., Bouwmeester, H., & Ruyter-Spira, C. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.164640 · Cited by 509
The roots of a new green revolution
Herder, G. D., Van Isterdael, G., Beeckman, T., & De Smet, I. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.009 · Cited by 508
Root system architecture: insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops
Smith, S., & De Smet, I. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0234 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- LAMBERS, H., SHANE, M. W., CRAMER, M. D., PEARSE, S. J., & VENEKLAAS, E. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-12
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 693-713
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W1998307303
- Cited by
- 1,318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Structure and Functioning for Efficient Acquisition of Phosphorus: Matching Morphological and Physiological Traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcl114
- The paper
- LAMBERS, H., SHANE, M. W., CRAMER, M. D., PEARSE, S. J., & VENEKLAAS, E. J. (2006). Root Structure and Functioning for Efficient Acquisition of Phosphorus: Matching Morphological and Physiological Traits. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.