The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contrasting Patterns in Crop Domestication and Domestication Rates: Recent Archaeobotanical Insights from the Old World
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Archaeobotany, the study of plant remains from sites of ancient human activity, provides data for studying the initial evolution of domesticated plants. An important background to this is defining the domestication syndrome, those traits by which domesticated plants differ from wild relatives. These traits include features that have been selected under the conditions of cultivation. From archaeological remains the easiest traits to study are seed size and in cereal crops the loss of natural seed dispersal. SCOPE: The rate at which these features evolved and the ordering in which they evolved can now be documented for a few crops of Asia and Africa. This paper explores this in einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) from the Near East, rice (Oryza sativa) from China, mung (Vigna radiata) and urd (Vigna mungo) beans from India, and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) from west Africa. Brief reference is made to similar data on lentils (Lens culinaris), peas (Pisum sativum), soybean (Glycine max) and adzuki bean (Vigna angularis). Available quantitative data from archaeological finds are compiled to explore changes with domestication. The disjunction in cereals between seed size increase and dispersal is explored, and rates at which these features evolved are estimated from archaeobotanical data. Contrasts between crops, especially between cereals and pulses, are examined. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in domesticated grasses, changes in grain size and shape evolved prior to non-shattering ears or panicles. Initial grain size increases may have evolved during the first centuries of cultivation, within perhaps 500-1000 years. Non-shattering infructescences were much slower, becoming fixed about 1000-2000 years later. This suggests a need to reconsider the role of sickle harvesting in domestication. Pulses, by contrast, do not show evidence for seed size increase in relation to the earliest cultivation, and seed size increase may be delayed by 2000-4000 years. This implies that conditions that were sufficient to select for larger seed size in Poaceae were not sufficient in Fabaceae. It is proposed that animal-drawn ploughs (or ards) provided the selection pressure for larger seeds in legumes. This implies different thresholds of selective pressure, for example in relation to differing seed ontogenetics and underlying genetic architecture in these families. Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) may show some similarities to the pulses in terms of a lag-time before truly larger-grained forms evolved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300004310 · Cited by 5,136
Intcal04 Terrestrial Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 0–26 Cal Kyr BP
(2004) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200032999 · Cited by 3,673
Cattle Before Crops: The Beginnings of Food Production in Africa
Marshall, F., & Hildebrand, E. (2002) · Journal of World Prehistory · doi:10.1023/a:1019954903395 · Cited by 445
Cited by
Exploiting genetic diversity from landraces in wheat breeding for adaptation to climate change
Lopes, M. S., El-Basyoni, I., Baenziger, P. S., Singh, S., Royo, C., Ozbek, K., Aktas, H., Ozer, E., Ozdemir, F., Manickavelu, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv122 · Cited by 535
Piperno, D. R. (2011) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/659998 · Cited by 427
Plant domestication versus crop evolution: a conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes
Abbo, S., Pinhasi van-Oss, R., Gopher, A., Saranga, Y., Ofner, I., & Peleg, Z. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.12.002 · Cited by 313
Consilience of genetics and archaeobotany in the entangled history of rice
Fuller, D. Q., Sato, Y.-I., Castillo, C., Qin, L., Weisskopf, A. R., Kingwell-Banham, E. J., Song, J., Ahn, S.-M., & van Etten, J. (2010) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-010-0035-y · Cited by 292
Self-citationFuller, D. Q., Willcox, G., & Allaby, R. G. (2011) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2011.624747 · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuller, D. Q.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 903-924
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2119050721
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrasting Patterns in Crop Domestication and Domestication Rates: Recent Archaeobotanical Insights from the Old World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcm048
- The paper
- Fuller, D. Q. (2007). Contrasting Patterns in Crop Domestication and Domestication Rates: Recent Archaeobotanical Insights from the Old World. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.