The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Domestication to Crop Improvement: Genetic Resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneae)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Both sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) are members of the Andropogoneae tribe in the Poaceae and are each other's closest relatives amongst cultivated plants. Both are relatively recent domesticates and comparatively little of the genetic potential of these taxa and their wild relatives has been captured by breeding programmes to date. This review assesses the genetic gains made by plant breeders since domestication and the progress in the characterization of genetic resources and their utilization in crop improvement for these two related species. GENETIC RESOURCES: The genome of sorghum has recently been sequenced providing a great boost to our knowledge of the evolution of grass genomes and the wealth of diversity within S. bicolor taxa. Molecular analysis of the Sorghum genus has identified close relatives of S. bicolor with novel traits, endosperm structure and composition that may be used to expand the cultivated gene pool. Mutant populations (including TILLING populations) provide a useful addition to genetic resources for this species. Sugarcane is a complex polyploid with a large and variable number of copies of each gene. The wild relatives of sugarcane represent a reservoir of genetic diversity for use in sugarcane improvement. Techniques for quantitative molecular analysis of gene or allele copy number in this genetically complex crop have been developed. SNP discovery and mapping in sugarcane has been advanced by the development of high-throughput techniques for ecoTILLING in sugarcane. Genetic linkage maps of the sugarcane genome are being improved for use in breeding selection. The improvement of both sorghum and sugarcane will be accelerated by the incorporation of more diverse germplasm into the domesticated gene pools using molecular tools and the improved knowledge of these genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · Cited by 8,916
Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J. E., & Chapman, B. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307901101 · Cited by 1,097
Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics
Rafalski, A. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00240-6 · Cited by 1,066
T argeting I nduced L ocal L esions IN G enomes (TILLING) for Plant Functional Genomics
McCallum, C. M., Comai, L., Greene, E. A., & Henikoff, S. (2000) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.123.2.439 · Cited by 875
Bonierbale, M. W., Plaisted, R. L., & Tanksley, S. D. (1988) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/120.4.1095 · Cited by 802
Factors affecting sorghum protein digestibility
Duodu, K. G., Taylor, J. R. N., Belton, P. S., & Hamaker, B. R. (2003) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/s0733-5210(03)00016-x · Cited by 782
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.3.290 · Cited by 770
Lindeboom, N., Chang, P. R., & Tyler, R. T. (2004) · Starch - Stärke · doi:10.1002/star.200300218 · Cited by 763
Sorghum: origin, history, technology and production.
Smith, C. W., Frederiksen, R. A., & Smith, W. C. (2000) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 705
A Simple Sequence Repeat-Based Linkage Map of Barley
Ramsay, L., Macaulay, M., Ivanissevich, S. D., MacLean, K., Cardle, L., Fuller, J., Edwards, K. J., Tuvesson, S., Morgante, M., Massari, A., et al. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/156.4.1997 · Cited by 643
Cited by
Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement
Brozynska, M., Furtado, A., & Henry, R. J. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12454 · Cited by 426
Self-citationEnhanced enzyme saccharification of Sorghum bicolor straw using dilute alkali pretreatment
McIntosh, S., & Vancov, T. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.116 · Cited by 277
Inorganics in sugarcane bagasse and straw and their impacts for bioenergy and biorefining: A review
Negrão, D. R., Grandis, A., Buckeridge, M. S., Rocha, G. J. M., Leal, M. R. L. V., & Driemeier, C. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111268 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Dillon, S. L., Shapter, F. M., Henry, R. J., Cordeiro, G., Izquierdo, L., & Lee, L. S.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 975-989
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2106401060
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domestication to Crop Improvement: Genetic Resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcm192
- The paper
- Dillon, S. L., Shapter, F. M., Henry, R. J., Cordeiro, G., Izquierdo, L., & Lee, L. S. (2007). Domestication to Crop Improvement: Genetic Resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneae). Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.