Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazonian floodplains

Open access
Parolin, Pia, Lucas, Christine, Piedade, Maria Teresa F., Wittmann, Florian·2010·Annals of Botany

Abstract

Background Flood-tolerant tree species of the Amazonian floodplain forests are subjected to an annual dry period of variable severity imposed when low river-water levels coincide with minimal precipitation.Although the responses of these species to flooding have been examined extensively, their responses to drought, in terms of phenology, growth and physiology, have been neglected hitherto, although some information is found in publications that focus on flooding.† Scope The present review examines the dry phase of the annual flooding cycle.It consolidates existing knowledge regarding responses to drought among adult trees and seedlings of many Amazonian floodplain species.† Main Findings Flood-tolerant species display variable physiological responses to dry periods and drought that indicate desiccation avoidance, such as reduced photosynthetic activity and reduced root respiration.However, tolerance and avoidance strategies for drought vary markedly among species.Drought can substantially decrease growth, biomass and photosynthetic activity among seedlings in field and laboratory studies.When compared with the responses to flooding, drought can impose higher seedling mortality and slower growth rates, especially among evergreen species.Results indicate that tolerance and avoidance strategies for drought vary markedly between species.Both seedling recruitment and photosynthetic activity are affected by drought, † Conclusions For many species, the effects of drought can be as important as flooding for survival and growth, particularly at the seedling phase of establishment, ultimately influencing species composition.In the context of climate change and predicted decreases in precipitation in the Amazon Basin, the effects of drought on plant physiology and species distribution in tropical floodplain forest ecosystems should not be overlooked.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mcp258

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Parolin, P., Lucas, C., Piedade, M. T. F., & Wittmann, F.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2009-10-31
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
129-139
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2118636214
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazonian floodplains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcp258
The paper
Parolin, P., Lucas, C., Piedade, M. T. F., & Wittmann, F. (2010). Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazonian floodplains. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.