The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazonian floodplains
Open accessAbstract
Background Flood-tolerant tree species of the Amazonian floodplain forests are subjected to an annual dry period of variable severity imposed when low river-water levels coincide with minimal precipitation.Although the responses of these species to flooding have been examined extensively, their responses to drought, in terms of phenology, growth and physiology, have been neglected hitherto, although some information is found in publications that focus on flooding.† Scope The present review examines the dry phase of the annual flooding cycle.It consolidates existing knowledge regarding responses to drought among adult trees and seedlings of many Amazonian floodplain species.† Main Findings Flood-tolerant species display variable physiological responses to dry periods and drought that indicate desiccation avoidance, such as reduced photosynthetic activity and reduced root respiration.However, tolerance and avoidance strategies for drought vary markedly among species.Drought can substantially decrease growth, biomass and photosynthetic activity among seedlings in field and laboratory studies.When compared with the responses to flooding, drought can impose higher seedling mortality and slower growth rates, especially among evergreen species.Results indicate that tolerance and avoidance strategies for drought vary markedly between species.Both seedling recruitment and photosynthetic activity are affected by drought, † Conclusions For many species, the effects of drought can be as important as flooding for survival and growth, particularly at the seedling phase of establishment, ultimately influencing species composition.In the context of climate change and predicted decreases in precipitation in the Amazon Basin, the effects of drought on plant physiology and species distribution in tropical floodplain forest ecosystems should not be overlooked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
The drought of Amazonia in 2005.
Marengo, J. A., Nobre, C. A., Tomasella, J., Oyama, M. D., Sampaio de Oliveira, G., de Oliveira, R., Camargo, H., Alves, L. M., & Brown, I. F. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli1600.1 · Cited by 725
Cited by
Fukao, T., Yeung, E., & Bailey-Serres, J. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.110.080325 · Cited by 572
Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere
Peñuelas, J., Sardans, J., Estiarte, M., Ogaya, R., Carnicer, J., Coll, M., Barbeta, A., Rivas‐Ubach, A., Llusià, J., Garbulsky, M., et al. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12143 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Parolin, P., Lucas, C., Piedade, M. T. F., & Wittmann, F.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-10-31
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-139
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2118636214
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazonian floodplains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcp258
- The paper
- Parolin, P., Lucas, C., Piedade, M. T. F., & Wittmann, F. (2010). Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazonian floodplains. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.