Cited by 127Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsPlant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

The barley MATE gene, HvAACT1, increases citrate efflux and Al3+ tolerance when expressed in wheat and barley

Open access
Zhou, Gaofeng, Delhaize, Emmanuel, Zhou, Meixue, Ryan, Peter R.·2013·Annals of Botany

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Aluminium is toxic in acid soils because the soluble Al(3+) inhibits root growth. A mechanism of Al(3+) tolerance discovered in many plant species involves the release of organic anions from root apices. The Al(3+)-activated release of citrate from the root apices of Al(3+)-tolerant genotypes of barley is controlled by a MATE gene named HvAACT1 that encodes a citrate transport protein located on the plasma membrane. The aim of this study was to investigate whether expressing HvAACT1 with a constitutive promoter in barley and wheat can increase citrate efflux and Al(3+) tolerance of these important cereal species. METHODS: HvAACT1 was over-expressed in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) using the maize ubiquitin promoter. Root apices of transgenic and control lines were analysed for HvAACT1 expression and organic acid efflux. The Al(3+) tolerance of transgenic and control lines was assessed in both hydroponic solution and acid soil. KEY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Increased HvAACT1 expression in both cereal species was associated with increased citrate efflux from root apices and enhanced Al(3+) tolerance, thus demonstrating that biotechnology can complement traditional breeding practices to increase the Al(3+) tolerance of important crop plants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mct135

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple mechanisms confer Al3+ tolerance in barley.

    “Zhou et al. (2013) showed that although overexpression of HvAACT1 enhanced plant tolerance to aluminium (Al 3+ ), engineered lines were not as tolerant as the existing cultivar 'Dayton', leading the authors to propose multiple mechanisms conferring Al 3+ tolerance in barley (Table 1).”
  • Overexpression of HvAACT1 enhanced plant tolerance to aluminium (Al3+).

    “Zhou et al. (2013) showed that although overexpression of HvAACT1 enhanced plant tolerance to aluminium (Al 3+ ), engineered lines were not as tolerant as the existing cultivar 'Dayton', leading the authors to propose multiple mechanisms conferring Al 3+ tolerance in barley (Table 1).”
  • Engineered lines overexpressing HvAACT1 were not as tolerant as the existing cultivar 'Dayton'.

    “Zhou et al. (2013) showed that although overexpression of HvAACT1 enhanced plant tolerance to aluminium (Al 3+ ), engineered lines were not as tolerant as the existing cultivar 'Dayton', leading the authors to propose multiple mechanisms conferring Al 3+ tolerance in barley (Table 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Furlani PR, Bastos CR, Borgonovi RA, Schaffert RE. Differential responses of sorghum genotypes for tolerance to aluminum in nutrient solutions. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. 1987;22:323–330. [Google Scholar]
  2. Koyama H, Ikka T, Kobayashi Y, Hasegawa M. Comparison of aluminum-tolerance and other stress factors associated with acid soil between Arabidopsis accessions. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2003;44:S164–S164. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, G., Delhaize, E., Zhou, M., & Ryan, P. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Meixue
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2013-06-24
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
603-612
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2129425352
Cited by
127
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
MATE transporters, aluminum tolerance, citrate efflux, aluminum toxicity, acid soils, transgenic wheat, transgenic barley, root tip
MeSH terms
Aluminum, Hordeum, Carrier Proteins, Plant Proteins, Triticum, Citric Acid, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review