Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatiotemporal variation in the pollination systems of a supergeneralist plant: is Angelica sylvestris(Apiaceae) locally adapted to its most effective pollinators?

Zych, Marcin, Junker, Robert R, Nepi, Massimo, Stpiczyńska, Małgorzata, Stolarska, Barbara, Roguz, Katarzyna·2019·Annals of Botany
DOI 10.1093/aob/mcy140
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mcy140

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. Aigner, 2005, Variation in pollination performance gradients in a Dudleya species complex: can generalization promote floral divergence, Functional Ecology, 19, 681, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01009.x · DOI
  2. Ambruster, 2000, Pollination “principles” revisited: specialization, pollination syndromes, and the evolution of flowers
  3. Anderson, 2009, Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an African Gladiolus (Iridaceae), Evolution, 64, 960, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00880.x · DOI
  4. Archer, 2001, Changes in abundance of Vespula germanica and V. vulgaris in England, Ecological Entomology, 26, 1, 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00296.x · DOI
  5. Armbruster, 1985, Patterns of character divergence and the evolution of reproductive ecotypes of Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae), Evolution, 39, 733, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00416.x · DOI
  6. Armbruster, 2009, Associations between floral specialization and species diversity: cause, effect, or correlation, Evolutionary Ecology Research, 23, 159, 10.1007/s10682-008-9259-z · DOI
  7. Artz, 2010, Spatiotemporal variation in the reproductive ecology of two parapatric subspecies of Oenothera cespitosa (Onagraceae), American Journal of Botany, 97, 1498, 10.3732/ajb.1000086 · DOI
  8. Baker, 1977, Non-sugar chemical constituents of nectar, Apidologie, 8, 349, 10.1051/apido:19770405 · DOI
  9. Baker, 1986, The occurrence and significance of amino acids in floral nectar, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 151, 175, 10.1007/BF02430273 · DOI
  10. Bartoš, 2015, Specialization of pollination systems of two co-flowering phenotypically generalized Hypericum species (Hypericaceae) in Cameroon, Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 9, 241, 10.1007/s11829-015-9378-8 · DOI
  11. Bell, 1971, Breeding systems and floral biology of the Umbelliferae or evidence for specialization in unspecialized flowers, 93
  12. Bell, 1978, The umbel as a reproductive unit in the Apiaceae, 739
  13. Bisht, 2008, Assessment of reproductive potential of different populations of Angelica glauca Edgew., a critically endangered Himalayan medicinal herb, Journal of Mountain Science, 5, 84, 10.1007/s11629-008-0084-1 · DOI
  14. Bolker, 2009, Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Borg-Karlson, 1994, Volatile compounds from flowers of six species in the family Apiaceae – bouquets for different pollinators, Phytochemistry, 35, 111, 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)90518-1 · DOI
  16. Bouman, 2017, The role of the pollination niche in community assembly of Erica species in a biodiversity hotspot, Journal of Plant Ecology, 10, 634
  17. Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Machine Learning, 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Brody, 1997, Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology, Ecology, 78, 1624, 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1624:EOPHAS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  19. Brosi, 2016, Pollinator specialization: from the individual to the community, New Phytologist, 210, 1190, 10.1111/nph.13951 · DOI
  20. Cannon, 1968, Angelica L, 357
  21. Carvalheiro, 2008, Pollinator networks, alien species and the conservation of rare plants: Trinia glauca as a case study, Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 1419, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01518.x · DOI
  22. Castro, 2013, So many visitors and so few pollinators: variation in insect frequency and effectiveness governs the reproductive success of an endemic milkwort, Plant Ecology, 214, 1233, 10.1007/s11258-013-0247-1 · DOI
  23. Cohen, 1993, Synthesis of a fluorescent derivatizing reagent, 6 aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate, and its application for the analysis of hydrolysate amino acids via high performance liquid chromatography, Analytical Biochemistry, 211, 279, 10.1006/abio.1993.1270 · DOI
  24. Corbet, 2006, A typology of pollination systems: implications for crop management and the conservation of wild plants, 315
  25. Cosacov, 2008, Variation of pollinator assemblages and pollen limitation in a locally specialized system: the pil-producing Nierembergia linariifolia (Solanaceae), Annals of Botany, 102, 723, 10.1093/aob/mcn154 · DOI
  26. Cosacov, 2014, Geographical differentiation in floral traits across the distribution range of the Patagonian oil-secreting Calceolaria polyrhiza: do pollinators matter, Annals of Botany, 113, 251, 10.1093/aob/mct239 · DOI
  27. Cruden, 1977, Temporal dioecism: an alternative to dioecism, Evolution, 31, 863
  28. Cursach, 2012, Implications of the reproductive biology of the narrow endemic Naufraga balearica (Apiaceae) for its conservation status, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298, 581, 10.1007/s00606-011-0568-2 · DOI
  29. Cursach, 2012, Reproductive biology and reproductive output assessment in natural and introduced subpopulations of Apium bermejoi, a ‘Critically Endangered’ endemic plant from Menorca (western Mediterranean), Nordic Journal of Botany, 30, 754, 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2012.01437.x · DOI
  30. Dafni, 2005, Practical pollination ecology
  31. Danderson, 2010, Effects of herbivory and inflorescence size on insect visitation to Eryngium yuccifolium (Apiaceae), a prairie plant, American Midland Naturalist, 163, 234, 10.1674/0003-0031-163.1.234 · DOI
  32. Davila, 2007, Bee boys and fly girls: do pollinators prefer male or female umbels in protandrous parsnip, Trachymene incisa (Apiaceae), Austral Ecology, 32, 798, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01757.x · DOI
  33. Davila, 2008, Variation in native pollinators in the absence of honeybees: implications for reproductive success of an Australian generalist-pollinated herb Trachymene incisa (Apiaceae), Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 156, 479, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00774.x · DOI
  34. Dixon, 2003, VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology, Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 927, 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x · DOI
  35. Dobson, 2006, Relationship between floral fragrance composition and type of pollinator, 147
  36. Ellis, 1993, To make a meadow it takes a clover and a bee: the entomophilous flora of NW Europe and its insects, Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 63, 193, 10.1163/26660644-06304001 · DOI
  37. Faegri, 1966, The principles of pollination ecology
  38. Fenster, 2004, Pollination syndromes and floral specialization, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, 375, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347 · DOI
  39. Gijbels, 2014, Landscape scale variation in nectar amino acid and sugar composition in a Lepidoptera pollinated orchid species and its relation with fruit set, Journal of Ecology, 102, 136, 10.1111/1365-2745.12183 · DOI
  40. Gómez, 1999, Generalization vs. specialization in the pollination system of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae), Ecology, 80, 796, 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0796:GVSITP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  41. Gómez, 2006, Ecological factors that promote the evolution of generalization in pollination systems, 145
  42. Gómez, 2009, Local adaptation and maladaptation to pollinators in a generalist geographic mosaic, Ecology Letters, 12, 672, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01324.x · DOI
  43. Gómez, 2009, A geographic selection mosaic in a generalized plant–pollinator–herbivore system, Ecological Monographs, 79, 245, 10.1890/08-0511.1 · DOI
  44. Gómez, 2014, Evolution of pollination niches and floral divergence in the generalist plant Erysimum mediohispanicum, Annals of Botany, 113, 237, 10.1093/aob/mct186 · DOI
  45. Gómez, 2015, Evolution of pollination niches in a generalist plant clade, New Phytologist, 205, 440, 10.1111/nph.13016 · DOI
  46. González-Teuber, 2009, Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters, Plant Signaling and Behavior, 4, 809, 10.4161/psb.4.9.9393 · DOI
  47. Grant, 1949, Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms, Evolution, 3, 82, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1949.tb00007.x · DOI
  48. Herrera, 1988, Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of pollinator assemblage, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 35, 95, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00461.x · DOI
  49. Herrera, 1989, Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the “quantity” component in a plant–pollinator system, Oecologia, 80, 241, 10.1007/BF00380158 · DOI
  50. Herrera, 1996, Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil’s advocate approach, 65
  51. Herrera, 2005, Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon, American Journal of Botany, 92, 13, 10.3732/ajb.92.1.13 · DOI
  52. Herrera, 2006, Geographical context of floral evolution: towards an improved research programme in floral diversification, 278, 10.1093/oso/9780198570851.003.0015 · DOI
  53. Johnson, 2006, Pollinator-driven speciation in plants, 295, 10.1093/oso/9780198570851.003.0016 · DOI
  54. Johnson, 2010, The pollination niche and its role in the diversification and maintenance of the southern African flora, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 365, 499, 10.1098/rstb.2009.0243 · DOI
  55. Johnson, 2000, Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 140, 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01811-X · DOI
  56. Johnson, 1995, The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect-visitor behavior in Campanula americana, Oecologia, 102, 174, 10.1007/BF00333249 · DOI
  57. Jordano, 1987, Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution, American Naturalist, 129, 657, 10.1086/284665 · DOI
  58. Junker, 2016, Multifunctional and diverse floral scents mediate biotic interactions embedded in communities, 257, 10.1007/978-3-319-33498-1_11 · DOI
  59. Junker, 2015, Microhabitat heterogeneity across leaves and flower organs promotes bacterial diversity, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 91, fiv097, 10.1093/femsec/fiv097 · DOI
  60. Kaye, 1994, Population biology of Lomatium bradshawii. II. Insect interactions, phenology and breeding system
  61. Knudsen, 2006, Diversity and distribution of floral scent, Botanical Review, 72, 1, 10.1663/0006-8101(2006)72[1:DADOFS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  62. Knuth, 1898, Handbuch der Blütenbiologie, II Band, 1. Teil: Ranunculaceae bis Compositae
  63. Kuppler, 2016, Time-invariant differences between plant individuals in interactions with arthropods correlate with intraspecific variation in plant phenology, morphology and floral scent, New Phytologist, 210, 1357, 10.1111/nph.13858 · DOI
  64. Lamborn, 2000, Experimental assessment of the functional morphology of inflorescences of Daucus carota (Apiaceae): testing the ‘fly catcher effect’, Functional Ecology, 14, 445, 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00440.x · DOI
  65. Lande, 1976, Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution, Evolution, 30, 314, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x · DOI · Paper page
  66. Lanza, 1995, Variation in nectar volume and composition of Impatiens capensis at the individual, plant, and population levels, Oecologia, 102, 113, 10.1007/BF00333318 · DOI
  67. Lindsey, 1984, Reproductive biology of Apiaceae. 1. Floral visitors to Thaspium and Zizia and their importance in pollination, American Journal of Botany, 71, 375, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1984.tb12524.x · DOI
  68. Lindsey, 1985, Reproductive biology of Apiaceae. 2. Cryptic specialization and floral evolution in Thaspium and Zizia, American Journal of Botany, 72, 231, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1985.tb08288.x · DOI
  69. Mabberley, 2008, Mabberley’s plant-book. A portable dictionary of plants, their classification and uses
  70. Niemirski, 2011, Fly pollination of dichogamous Angelica sylvestris (Apiaceae): how (functionally) specialized can a (morphologically) generalized plant be, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 294, 147, 10.1007/s00606-011-0454-y · DOI
  71. Van der Niet, 2012, Phylogenetic evidence for pollinator-driven diversification of angiosperms, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 353, 10.1016/j.tree.2012.02.002 · DOI
  72. Van der Niet, 2014, Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives, Annals of Botany, 113, 199, 10.1093/aob/mct290 · DOI
  73. Van der Niet, 2014, Do pollinator distributions underlie the evolution of pollination ecotypes in the Cape shrub Erica plukenetii, Annals of Botany, 113, 301, 10.1093/aob/mct193 · DOI
  74. Ojala, 1986, Variation of Angelica archangelica subsp. archangelica (Apiaceae) in northern Fennoscandia: 3. Interpopulational variation in reproductive and life-history characters, Annales Botanici Fennici, 23, 11
  75. Olesen, 2007, The openness of a flower and its number of flower-visitor species, Taxon, 56, 729, 10.2307/25065856 · DOI
  76. Ollerton, 1996, Reconciling ecological processes with phylogenetic patterns: the apparent paradox of plant-pollinator systems, Journal of Ecology, 84, 767, 10.2307/2261338 · DOI
  77. Ollerton, 2007, Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to be a generalist flower, Taxon, 56, 717, 10.2307/25065855 · DOI
  78. Padyšáková, 2013, Generalization versus specialization in pollination systems: visitors, thieves, and pollinators of Hypoestes aristata (Acanthaceae), Plos One, 8, e59299, 10.1371/journal.pone.0059299 · DOI
  79. Pérez-Bañón, 2007, Pollination in small islands by occasional visitors: the case of Daucus carota subsp. commutatus (Apiaceae) in the Columbretes archipelago, Spain, Plant Ecology, 192, 133, 10.1007/s11258-006-9233-1 · DOI
  80. Perez-Barrales, 2007, Differences in pollinator faunas may generate geographic differences in floral morphology and integration in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae), Oikos, 116, 1904, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15994.x · DOI
  81. Pickering, 2002, Reproductive ecology and the effect of altitude on sex ratios in the dioecious herb Aciphylla simplicifolia (Apiaceae), Australian Journal of Botany, 50, 289, 10.1071/BT01043 · DOI
  82. Price, 2005, Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study, Ecology, 86, 2106, 10.1890/04-1274 · DOI
  83. Proctor, 1996, The natural history of pollination
  84. R Development Core Team, 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  85. Reverté, 2016, Pollinators show flower colour preferences but flowers with similar colours do not attract similar pollinators, Annals of Botany, 118, 249, 10.1093/aob/mcw103 · DOI
  86. Roy, 2017, Nectar biology: from molecules to ecosystems, Plant Science, 262, 148, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.04.012 · DOI
  87. Schemske, 1984, Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization, Science, 225, 519, 10.1126/science.225.4661.519 · DOI
  88. Schlessman, 2004, Protogyny in Apiaceae, subfamily Apioideae: systematic and geographic distributions, associated traits, and evolutionary hypotheses, South African Journal of Botany, 70, 475, 10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30232-5 · DOI
  89. Schlessman, 2004, Functions of staminate flowers in andromonoecious Pseudocymopterus montanus (Apiaceae, Apioideae), Plant Species Biology, 19, 1, 10.1111/j.1442-1984.2004.00096.x · DOI
  90. Stpiczyńska, 2015, Nectaries and male-biased nectar production in protandrous flowers of a perennial umbellifer Angelica sylvestris L. (Apiaceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution, 301, 1099, 10.1007/s00606-014-1152-3 · DOI
  91. Terrab, 2007, Analysis of amino acids in nectar from Silene colorata Poiret (Caryophyllaceae), Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 155, 49, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00673.x · DOI
  92. Teulier, 2016, Proline as a fuel for insect flight: enhancing carbohydrate oxidation in hymenopterans, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 283, 8, 10.1098/rspb.2016.0333 · DOI
  93. Thompson, 2005, The geographic mosaic of coevolution, 10.7208/chicago/9780226118697.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Tollsten, 1994, Differentiation in floral scent chemistry among populations of Conopodium majus (Apiaceae), Nordic Journal of Botany, 14, 361, 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1994.tb00619.x · DOI
  95. Tollsten, 1994, Floral scent in generalistic Angelica (Apiaceae) – an adaptive character, Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 22, 161, 10.1016/0305-1978(94)90006-X · DOI
  96. Waser, 1996, Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters, Ecology, 77, 1043, 10.2307/2265575 · DOI
  97. Webb, 1981, Andromonoecism, protandry, and sexual selection in Umbelliferae, New Zealand Journal of Botany, 19, 335, 10.1080/0028825X.1981.10426389 · DOI
  98. Willmer, 2011, Pollination and floral ecology
  99. Wilson, 1996, How do flowers diverge, 88, 10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_4 · DOI
  100. Yamada, 2014, Floral morphology and pollinator fauna characteristics of island and mainland populations of Ligustrum ovalifolium (Oleaceae), Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 174, 489, 10.1111/boj.12092 · DOI
  101. Zamora, 2000, Functional equivalence in plant-animal interactions: ecological and evolutionary consequences, Oikos, 88, 442, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880222.x · DOI
  102. Zych, 2002, Pollination biology of Heracleum sphondylium L. (Apiaceae). The advantages of being white and compact, Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 71, 163, 10.5586/asbp.2002.019 · DOI
  103. Zych, 2007, On flower visitors and true pollinators: the case of protandrous Heracleum sphondylium L. (Apiaceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution, 263, 159, 10.1007/s00606-006-0493-y · DOI
  104. Zych, 2007, Umbellifers as potential keystone species in restoration projects, Acta Agrobotanica, 60, 45, 10.5586/aa.2007.029 · DOI
  105. Zych, 2014, Myophily in the critically endangered umbelliferous plant Ostericum palustre Besser (Apiaceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution, 300, 187, 10.1007/s00606-013-0870-2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Zych, M., Junker, R. R., Nepi, M., Stpiczyńska, M., Stolarska, B., & Roguz, K.
Affiliations
  • Botanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Aleje Ujazdowskie, Warszawa, Poland
  • Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
  • Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, via Mattioli, Siena, Italy
Venue
Annals of Botany
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2018-07-28
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
415-428
ISSN
  • 0305-7364
  • 1095-8290
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcy140
Cited by
44
References
0
Language
en
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Funders
  • Polish National Science Centre (2011/01/B/NZ8/03146)
  • Ministry of Science and Higher Education (112629/2016)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatiotemporal variation in the pollination systems of a supergeneralist plant: is Angelica sylvestris(Apiaceae) locally adapted to its most effective pollinators? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcy140
The paper
Zych, M., Junker, R. R., Nepi, M., Stpiczyńska, M., Stolarska, B., & Roguz, K. (2019). Spatiotemporal variation in the pollination systems of a supergeneralist plant: is Angelica sylvestris(Apiaceae) locally adapted to its most effective pollinators? Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.